4-Exhibit III Pricing Evaulation Page.doc
DOC document 53 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HL-LHC-AUP-302085-TC
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HL-LHC AUP-302085-TC
EXHIBIT II PRICING/EVALUATION PAGE 1
PRICING/EVALUATION PAGE
QUADRUPOLE MAGNET CONDUCTOR
The Subcontractor shall furnish all labor, material, equipment, transportation and supervision necessary to fabricate and deliver the requested quantities of Nb3Sn strand conductor for the US High Luminosity LHC Accelerator Upgrade Project (HL-LHC AUP), all in accordance with the attached solicitation documents.
PRICING:
All offering entities are directed to enter pricing for the fixed price proposal for the Base Proposal and Alternate Proposal.
BASE PROPOSAL
Supplier shall deliver whole units of 500 m unit length (UL). Total need is 540 km total length equal to 1080 units of 500 m unit length (UL) with the yearly material and production specified.
| Year |
| Strand km |
| $/km |
| TOTAL Strand |
| Milestone A (20%) |
| Milestone B (20%) |
| Delivery (60%) |
| TOTAL |
| Base Proposal |
| 2020 |
| 540 |
ALTERNATE PROPOSAL
Supplier shall deliver whole units of 500 m or 840 m unit length (UL) with the limitation that no more than one length per spool shipped may be designated as an 840 m unit, and not more than 20% of the total length may consist of 840 m units. Total needed is 540 km total length with the yearly material and production specified.
| Year |
| Strand km |
| $/km |
| TOTAL Strand |
| Milestone A (20%) |
| Milestone B (20%) |
| Delivery (60%) |
| TOTAL |
| Alternate Proposal |
| 2020 |
| 540 |
The response shall include, and detail, any cost differences between the Total Base Proposal, and Total Alternate Proposal.
EVALUATION and AWARD:
In order to provide the Laboratory with the greatest degree of flexibility to match the available funding levels with the received offerings and to expedite the process, it is necessary to develop the Base Proposal and Alternate Proposal. As such, FRA reserves the right to place one (1) award for the Base Proposal, for Alternate Proposal, or to place no order at all.
Source selection will be conducted on a “Best Value” basis. Best Value employs a trade-off process that permits award to other than the lowest priced Offeror, or other than the highest technically rated Offeror. FRA may select the source whose proposal offers the best value to FRA in terms of technical merit, capabilities and experience, and other factors including price. Evaluation criteria are divided into two categories, Technical and Price.
By:
(Signature in Ink)
(Print or Type Name)
Title:
Firm:
Date:
(Print or Type Date)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .