24R2007_SOL_Attachment_2_PPQ.pdf

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Percent of project work performed: Click or tap here to enter text.

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #): Click or tap here to enter text.

Other (Explain) Joint Venture Work Performed as: ☐Prime Contractor ☐Subcontractor

N/CAGE Code: Click or tap here to enter text.

Unique Entity ID: Click or tap here to enter text.

Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text.

Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text.

Contractor Information:

Firm Name: Click or tap here to enter text.

Address: Click or tap here to enter text.

Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text.

Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text.

Period of Performance: Click or tap here to enter text.

Other (Explain) Firm Fixed Price ☐Cost Reimbursement Contract Type:

Final Contract Value: Click or tap here to enter text. Contract Number: Click or tap here to enter text.

Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text.

Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text.

Address: Click or tap here to enter text.

Reference Information:

Business Name of Reference:

Click or tap here to enter text.

Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text.

Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text.

HE125424R2007 Attachment 2

PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

This Questionnaire Pertains to: Yokota Military Community, Japan

The Offeror must complete the “To be completed by Offeror” section prior to sending the PPQ to the Offeror’s Reference/Customer. The Offeror’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the completed PPQ via e-mail to the attention of:

Department of Defense Education Activity

Attn: Contract Specialist: Ms. Carolyn Vincent Contracting Officer: Mr. John O. Myers III 4800 Mark Center Drive, 5th Floor, Suite #05H02-10 Alexandria, VA 22350

E-Mail:carolyn.vincent@dodea.edu E-Mail: john.myers2@dodea.edu

This information section is to be completed by the Offeror.

Source Selection Information1 - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 mailto:carolyn.vincent@dodea.edu mailto:john.myers2@dodea.edu

This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.

Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:

P/U S G VG E N

Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Neutral/N/A

Does not meet minimum Meets or slightly Effective Very effective Of exceptional No record of acceptable standards in exceeds minimum performance; fully performance; fully merit; exemplary relevant past one or more areas; acceptable responsive to responsive to contract performance in a performance or remedial action required standards; adequate contract requirements; contract timely, efficient, past performance in one or more areas; results; reportable requirements; requirements and economical information is not deficiencies in one or deficiencies with reportable accomplished in a timely, manner; very available.

more areas which identifiable, but not deficiencies, but with efficient, and economical minor (if any) adversely affect overall substantial, effects on little identifiable manner for the most part; deficiencies with performance. overall performance. effect on overall only minor deficiencies no adverse effect performance. with minimal effect on on overall overall performance. performance.

1. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience with transporting pre-kindergarten through high school grade children from their designated bus stops to and from school in the school districts? Comments:

P ☐ S☐ G☐ VG☐ E☐ N

2. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience with transporting a special needs student with a Safety Aide and providing an appropriate vehicle from their designated stop to their school, and vice versa? Comments:

P ☐ S☐ G☐ VG☐ E☐ N

3. Reserved.

4. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience in appropriately managing their personnel (i.e. Has the Contractor been responsive to deficiencies and performance issues and making timely corrections? Has the Contractor taken a proactive approach when known performance issues may hinder mission requirements?) Comments:

P ☐ S☐ G☐ VG☐ E☐ N

5. How would you rate the Contractor in responding to incidents and accidents in regards to transporting students on the bus? Comments:

P ☐ S☐ G☐ VG☐ E☐ N☐

6. Reserved.

7. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in providing, tracking and reporting required training? Comments:

P ☐ S☐ G☐ VG☐ E☐ N☐

8. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in providing timely and accurate reports and other contract deliverables? Comments:

P ☐ S☐ G☐ VG☐ E☐ N☐

9. How would you rate the Contractor’s communication? Have they communicated issues as necessary to ensure all stakeholders were informed?

Comments:

P ☐ S☐ G☐ VG☐ E☐ N☐

10. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? Comments: P ☐ S☐ G☐ VG☐ E☐ N☐

Brief Description of Effort to include relevancy to the solicitation requirements of the RFP.

Explain any problems and resolutions