| QUESTION: Paragraph requires surge support across CB, CWMDT, CIT and CTN technical areas but also states the work falls within PWS 5.2 which is CBDP RDT&E Tasks. Are the tasks listed part of the CBDP portfolio? Is this surge CLIN only for CBDP work or is it available to support the other departments? | Sentence was corrected to "…across RD-CB's CWMD, CIT and CTN…." | | | | |
| 36 | Table L.1.2 Proposal Organization, L.3.2 Volume Organization and L.3.3.2.1 Management Approach | Contract | The Proposal Organization and the Volume organization lists the Management Approach first, followed by the Integrated Management Plan (L.1.2, L.3.2), but then the detailed paragraphs in L.3.3.2.1 lists the Integrated Management Plan details BEFORE the Management Approach. Would the government clarify the order of the Mission Capability, Subfactor A Management Approach? | Comment 37 Response: Agree with OGC comment: revise the order of the Management Approach subfactor in L.1.2 and L.3.2 to require the 10-page integrated management plan (IMP) before the 35-page management approach. |
| 37 | Table L.1.2 Proposal Organization | Contract | Will the government consider adding additional 5 pages to Volume II - Mission Capability Subfactor A Management Approach to address the heavy to technical nature of this requirement? | The required page limit of 35 will remain. |
| 38 | Attachment 2, DD254 form, section 1b | Contract | Section 1.b. of the DD254 form indicates Secret safeguarding is required at the contractor location, but elsewhere in the form (section 11 and 11d) it appears SCI material could be handled at the contractor location. Will the Government please clarify what level of safeguarding is anticipated at the contractor location? | The organization facility requirement is TS/SCI. There is a government requirement to store up to SECRET documents at the contractor facility. |
| 39 | Attachment 6, ST+PMO+QASP | Technical | Attachment 6 provided by the Government is from the PMO contract. Please post the QASP for the S&T SME contractor. | The incorrect file was posted and will be replaced. |
| 40 | RFP, list of attachments pg 50 of 125 | Contract | Per Section J, List of Documents, Exhibits, and other attachments, there should be an Attachment 3, OCI Mitigation Plan. Please provide Attachment 3. | The OCI Mitigation Plan is proposed by the Offeror. The plan will be evaluated per the RFP and incorporated as an attachment to the award. |
| 41 | RFP, pg 79 of 125 | Technical | Table L.1.2 shows the requirement for an Executive Summary; however, L.3.2, Volume Organization does not include an Executive Summary. Can the Government please confirm that the Executive Summary required and where in L.3.2 does it belong? | Section L.3.2 revised including the Executive Summary |
| 42 | RFP, Attachment L-3, pg 83 of 125 | Technical | Attachment L-3, Physical Scientist (Weapons Effects/Solid Mechanics Scientist/Engineer) states in the first paragraph that the position is located at Kirkland AFB, New Mexico. In the last bullet of the position description it lists the location as DTRA-Ft Belvoir. Please confirm the correct location. | The location is at DTRA--Fort Belvoir, The attachment will be updated to deleted the Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico location |
| 43 | RFP, pg 75 of 125, Section L.2.7 | Contract | The table on page 75 of the RFP states that the historical RD FTE S&T SMEs with Security Clearance by Department average is 156. This appears to be the historical average of all of A&AS (including both PMO and SME contracts). Can the Government please confirm the total number of personnel with Security Clearance by Department? | This is the historical number of S&T SME A&AS across the RD, including the added JD/TT requirements. |
| 44 | RFP, pages 96-98 of 125 (Attachment L-1) | Technical | To organize information in Attachment L-1 for the ease and readability of the government's assessment, may tables (using the formatting requirements found in L.1.3.5.1) be used to respond to questions 5-8 in Attachment L-1? | Refer to question 7. |
| 45 | RFP, pg 100 of 125, Attachment L-2 | Contract | The current PDF format of Attachment L-2, present and past performance questionnaire (PPPQ), cannot be edited by Government POCs, the document must be converted to Word for editing. Would the government be amenable to offerors adjusting the format to support ease of PPPQ writing for Government POCs? If not, will the Goverment please provide a seperate file with just L-2 information that can be updated and sent to Government customers? | Contractors can convert to a Word document to input necessary information. |
| 46 | RFP; Section L.1.3.4 (pg 70 of 125) and Section L.1.3.7 (page 71 of 125) | Contract | In section L.1.3.4, it states that "Proposals shall be submitted in electronic format in CD-ROMs", however, section L.1.3.7 states that proposals shall be submitted electronically via Wide Area Workflow Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment. Please confirm that the proposal shall be submitted electronically via Wide Area Workflow Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment | Refer to Question 4. |
| 47 | Attachment 2, DD254 form, section 10i | Contract | Will the Government please confirm that ACCM access is at Government facilities? | ACCM access is at Government facilities only. |
| 48 | Attachment 2, DD254 form, Block 15 | Contract | Will the Government please confirm if this should be checked "Yes" if SCI is outside of CSO purview? | The NO block is correctly checked for Block 15. The "X" typed after the word "CSO" is a stray entry and should be ignored. |
| 49 | RFP, pg 74, L.2.7; PWS, pg 34, 7.1 | Contract | The PWS states "The contractor shall have a Top Secret facility clearance granted by the Defense Security Service (DSS) at the proximal facility IAW the approved S&T SME (Incoming) Management Plan timelines." However, section L.2.7 of the RFP states "The Offeror’s proximal facility should be able to store classified documents up to the SECRET level at the end of the transition period". Will the Government please confirm that the proximal facility should be able to store up to secret level documents? | The organizational security requirement is for TS. The proximal facility must be capable of storing up to SECRET both for documents and to support the SECRET VTC requirements. |
| 50 | RFP, pg 96-98 of 125 (Attachment L-1) | Technical | Please confirm that the Offeror may change the formatting of questions 3 and 4 in Attachment L-1 to reduce white space. For example, may the Offeror change the Primary Customer Points of Contacts in Question 4 from a vertical list into a horizontal table (using the formatting requirements found in L.1.3.5.1)? | Refer to question 7. |
| 51 | RFP, pg 69 of 125 (Table L.1.2) and pg 86 of 125 (L.4.3) | Technical | Section L.4.3 states "For each reference, the Offeror shall provide a narrative describing the effort and the results of the Offeror’s performance. For each reference, the Offeror shall complete a Present and Past Performance Information Form (attachment L-1)." Should the narrative describing the effort and the results of the Offeror's performance be seperate from attachment L-1 or included within Attachment L-1? | Refer to Question 9 |
| 52 | RFP Document page 69 of 125 (Table L.1.2) and page 86 of 125 (L.4.2) | Technical | Table L.1.2 allots 5 pages for the Present and Past Performance Information Form (Attachment L-1). If the narrative describing the effort and the results of the Offeror's performance are to be seperate from Attachment L-1, is this additional information still included in the 5 page limit? If the results of the Offeror's performance should be included in Attachment L-1, where should they be included? | Refer to Question 9 |
| 53 | RFP, pg 86 of 125 (L.4.4), pg 71 of 125 (L.1.3.5.3), and pg 69 of 125 (Table L.1.2) | Technical | Section L.4.4 Organizational Structure Change History states that "These “roadmaps” will not count toward the page limitations of Volume III." Section L.1.3.5.3 also states that Past Performance Roadmaps are excluded from the overall page count. However, Table L.1.2 provides a 5 page limit for the Organizational Change History section. Will the government consider removing the 5 page limit in Table L.1.2? | Yes, the Government agrees for this to be "Unlimited" vice the 5 page limit (and will update the L.1.2 table). |
| 54 | RFP, pg 122 of 125, Section M.2.4 | Contract | M.2.4 outlines the evaluation criteria for Subfactor A, SB Participation and Subfactor B, SB Subcontracting Past Performance but it does not include criteria for SB Subcontracting Plan (L.5.1). Is the SB Subcontracting Plan evaluated as part of the proposal submission? If so, can the Government please provide evaluation critera? | I defer to Sharon (Tracy), Sharon please answer. Response: the subcontracting plan is not "evaluated" for source selection purposes. An acceptable subcontracting plan is required for eligibility of award. It must contain all the elements requried in FAR 19.704(a). It must correspond to the Socioeconomic Committment (i.e. the number of dollars promised to small busiinesses), but the subcontracting plan is reviewed for compliance with FAR 19.704(a), not evaluated for source selection. |
| 55 | Exhibit A, pg 5 of 17; PWS pg 36, Section 10.0 | Contract | Will the Government please update pg 5 of Exhibit A to match the PWS performance metrics in sections 10.1-10.6? | Yes, Exhibit A will be updated. |
| 56 | RFP, pg 90 of 125 L.6.4 Cost or Pricing Information and Supporting Documentation and Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet | Contract | Section L.6.4 states that Offerors are required to segregate and identify transition-specific costs; the Government will exclude these costs from the most probably costs calculation. Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet does not include a tab or section for transition-specific costs. Can offeror's modify the Total Amount Tab in Attachment 5 to segregate transition-specific costs? | Refer to Question 17 |
| 57 | RFP, pg 91 of 125 L.6.5 Profit or Fee and Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet | Contract | Section L.6.5 states that there will be no profit or fee on travel and ODCs but the formula in Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet that applies fixed fee to total costs only removes direct travel costs. Should offeror's modify the formula in Attachment 5 to exclude ODCs incurring profit or fee? | This statement was in error; per this DTRA clause, fee is excluded from travel (it should not refer to ODCs). This will be revised. |
| 58 | RFP, pg 91 of 125 L.6.5 Profit or Fee and Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet | Contract | Will the Government please confirm that Materials/Supplies and Equipment can incur profit or fee? | Yes, only travel should omit fee. L.6.5 will be revised. |
| 59 | RFP, pg 93 & 94 of 125 L.6.6.1 and L.6.6.2, and Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet | Contract | Travel and Material plug values have been provided and offerors are directed to propose the plug numbers with no deviations. Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet has tabs for Materials-Supplies and Travel. If offerors are expected to propose the plug numbers provided, what information is required on the Materials-Supplies, and Travel tabs? Please confirm that offerors can propose costs for equipment and ODCs since plug numbers were not provided for those costs. | Contractor shall complete the respective tabs with the plug numbers. Yes equipment and ODCs can be proposed. |
| 60 | RFP, pgs 2 thru 13 Section B and Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet | Contract | Section B requires estimate costs, fixed fee and estimated costs + fixed fee for Section 5.1 RDT&E tasks and Section 5.2 CBDP RDT&E tasks. Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet does require offerors to provide pricing by CLIN/task. Can Offerors modify the Cost Spreadsheet to propose costs in accordance with the CLIN Structure? | Refer to question 16 |
| 61 | RFP, pg 92 of 125 L.6.6.1 Estimated CLIN Costs and Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet | Contract | Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet does not account for any Surge costs. Are offerors expected to include the Surge plug numbers in our cost proposals? If yes, where in Attachment 5 Cost Spreadsheet should offerors account for the Surge plug values that have been provided in Section L.6.6.1? | Yes plug surge numbers are to be used in the cost proposal. The surge plug numbers are associated with the surge CLINs. Refer to question 16 for revising spreadsheet to account for CLINs. |
| 62 | RFP, pgs 2 thru 13 Section B | Contract | Section B Surge CLINS require Estimated costs, fixed fee and estimated costs + fixed fee. Should offerors propose the Surge plug values as estimated costs and apply their proposed fixed fee to the Surge plug values to complete the Section B table? | The plug numbers shall be used in your cost proposals. Burdens include fixed fee already applied to the plug Surge CLINs. |
| 63 | PWS, pg 35, 9.1 | Contract | Section 9.1 of the PWS identifies one conference room requiring secure VTC: "At least one space shall allow reconfigurable seating (to include but not limited to: classroom, theater, conference table, U-shape, hollow square, banquet style, half-moon rounds, chevron or “V” shape, herringbone, and/or combinations) for a minimum of 50 persons. This meeting room shall have both secure and academic institution–compatible video conferencing capability. The VTC security capability must include the range of unclassified to Secret." Will the Government confirm that data processing and discussions above the Secret level will not be required at this facility? Also, will the government confirm if any other conference rooms or storage space need to be classified at the Secret level? | The proximal facility has the need to store up to the SECRET level. There will be no requirement for data processing and discussions above the SECRET level at this facility. The other conference rooms should allow for discussion up to SECRET level. |
| 64 | RFP, pg 92; L.6.6.1 | Contract | The CLIN values in the table appear to be incorrect, for example CLIN 1002 is listed twice. Will the Government please update the CLIN table. | Refer to Question #24 |
| 65 | Solicitation, DFARS, Page 30, Clause 252.209-9002 | Contract | Does the Non-Government Support Personnel clause flowdown to subcontractors under The Contractor? | Yes DFARS clause 252.209-9002 applies to all contractors. |
| 66 | PWS, 5.1.1, DTRA RDT&E Page 5 | Technical | "concentrated on the radiological, nuclear and high explosives (RNE) portion of the CBRNE spectrum and the CWMD, CIT or CTN mission domains, " will improvised high explosives remain as part of the mission for DTRA? | Some portion of the improvised high explosives mission will remain with DTRA for the next several years. RD will continue to support its portion of the remaining improvised high explosives mission as the program management responsibility transfer discussions continue between DTRA and the external services/agencies. |
| 67 | Attachment 2 - DD 254 | Contract | Are proposed subcontractors to complete Block 7 of the DD 254? | The Prime contractor is responsible for completing the DD 254. |
| 68 | Attachment 3 - OCI Mitigation Plan | Contract | Attachment 3 is missing - please provide. | Refer to Question 40 |
| 69 | Attachment 5: Government Cost Spreadsheet | Contract | Can we adjust the print ranges in the Excel cost attachment? | Yes print range can be adjusted. |
| 70 | Attachment 6 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) | Contract | The provided QASP provides information designed for the S&T PMO A&AS contractor. Will the government provide a QASP that supports the SME A&S contractor? | The S&T QASP will be be included in the RFP amendment. |
| 71 | Attachment L-1 p. 96 | Contract | Will the Government allow offerors to provide the requested information prescribed in L-1 in a table format? Will the Government allow offerors to delete rows/lines that are not used? Will the Government allow a ten (10) point readable font as in tables, charts, graphs, and figures? | Refer to Question 7. |
| 72 | Attachment L-3: Job Descriptions - Physical Scientist (Weapons Effects/Solid Mechanics Scientist/Engineer) p. 108 | Contract | The location for the Physical Scientist (Weapons Effects/Solid Mechanics Scientist/Engineer) is listed as both Kirtland AFB (at top of job description) and DTRA at Ft. Belvoir (at bottom of job description). Please clarify location of this notional employee. | Correct location is Fort Belvoir. Section L updated to delete KAFB sentence |
| 73 | L.1.2 ORGANIZATION/DISTRIBUTION/NUMBER OF COPIES/PAGE LIMITS p. 68 | Contract | The page limit for the executive summary is listed as 2 pages. L.3.3 references inclusion of an Executive Summary with requirements for information on teaming structure, team member roles and responsibilities, etc. Given the amount of information required, to include introduction of the team, request the government increase the page count for the executive summary to 4 pages or allow a Team Table to be provided as part of the executive summary that is outside page count. | Refer to Question 3 |
| 74 | L.1.2 (Table p. 69), L.3.2 (Volume Organization p. 79) | Contract | The Proposal Org table (L.1.2) states Sub-Factor A-Management Plan as 35 pages. Then below that it states the Integrated Management Plan as 10 pages. Then L.3.3.2.1 Management Approach (p. 80) describes in great detail the IMP first followed by equal level of detail for overarching Sub-Factor A. Is the IMP and its 10 pages part of the 35 pages or in addition for a total of 45 pages? | The Management Approach is 35 pages and the IMP is 10 pages in addition to the 35 pages for a total of 45 pages for the Management Plan and the IMP per Table L.1.2 |
| 75 | L.1.3.3 Validity Statement p. 70 | Contract | Should the Validity statement be included with Vol. I – Proposal Documentation or Vol. V – Cost/Price? | The Validity Statement shall be in Volume I. |
| 76 | L.1.3.4 Physical Appearance p. 70 | Contract | The solicitation is asking for proposals to be submitted in electronic format in CD-ROMS. Section L.1.2.a. and L.1.3.7 states offerors shall submit via WAWF. Please confirm CD-ROMs are not required. | Refer to Question 4 |
| 77 | L.1.3.5.1 Page Size p. 70 | Contract | Section L.1.3.5.1 states "Lettering within tables, charts, graphs, and figures shall be no smaller than ten (10) point Times New Roman." Will the Government consider rewording this to read "no smaller than ten (10) point in a readable font." Rationale: Other fonts are more suitable and easier to read than Times New Roman in a table or graphic. | All font shall be Times New Roman as stated in L.1.3.5.1 |
| 78 | L.1.3.5.1 Page Size p. 70 | Contract | Please confirm that an 11x17 page counts as one page against the page limit. | Refer to Question 5 |
| 79 | L.1.3.7 Electronic Delivery Attachment 5: Government Cost Spreadsheet, p. 72, bottom | Contract | Cost spreadsheet in the general and total amount tab does not provide for cost/price by CLIN, only a rollup of total cost/price. Can offerors modify the spreadsheet accordingly to show cost/price by CLIN either through additional worksheets in the cost spreadsheet or modifying the existing cost template? | Refer to Question 16. |
| 80 | L.2.10 p. 75 | Contract | Section L.2.10 states "The Offeror is responsible to ensure that all representations, certifications, acknowledgements, and statements provided in accordance with Sections K and L are (i) provided in the System for Award Management (SAM), https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM; and (ii) if not included in the SAM database, are completed and submitted with the Proposal Documentation volume." Does this apply to the prime only or all team partners as well? | This requirement pertains to the Prime contractor. |
| 81 | L.2.4 Government Offices p. 73 | Contract | The Government states "Provide the mailing address, telephone and fax numbers, and facility codes for the cognizant Contract Administration Office, Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and Government Paying Office. Also provide the name, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail address for the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO). The aforementioned information applies to the prime contractor and major subcontractors/teaming partners." Please confirm that the offeror needs to provide the "government paying office" for the Major subcontractors/teaming partners. | The Government paying office is only required for the prime Offeror. The RFP will be updated to reflect this. |
| 82 | L.3.3.2.1 Management Approach p. 80 | Technical | The draft DTRA RD SME RFP called for a 10-page Incoming Management Plan, which allows us to address in detail our overall transition in plan. However, on the final RFP the Incoming Management Plan requirement is gone, replaced by your 10-page Integrated Management Plan (IMP). This IMP requires us to address under the Team and Structure requirement basically our transition in plan. We consider the transition in plan to be vitally important to evaluation of our Team’s overall management plan to ensure continuity and mission accomplishment. However, we do not feel within the 10 allotted pages we can provide the level of detail needed to describe this all-important phase of contract support. We request the government raise the IMP page limit to 20 pages, which would allow us to adequately address our transition in plan, as well as the other requirements. The instructions for the Management Approach and the Integrated Management Plan do not include a requirement for a transition plan. Should a transition plan be included in one of these subsections? | The transition plan elements are included within the Incoming Management Plan elements with the Integrated Management Plan covering transition planning. There is no intent to have a separate Integrated Management Plan and a separate Transition Plan. The page count will be increased to 15 pages. |
| 83 | L.3.3.2.1 Management Approach p. 80 | Technical | Since there appears to be an overlap between the Management Approach and the Integrated Management Plan, can the Government clarify the difference between what should be addressed in the Management Approach vice what should be addressed in the Integrated Management Plan? | The Management Approach is expected to expand on the Integrated Management Plan. |
| 84 | L.5.0 VOLUME IV SOCIO-ECONOMIC COMMITMENT, PAGE 88, 2ND PARAGRAPH, 2ND SENTENCE | Contract | " Offerors are limited to submitting one report for each contract and an aggregate maximum of three (any combination of reports/audits). " Will the government confirm that a maximum of 3 subcontract reports (1 for each contract) is required? | Offerors are limited to one report for each contract and a maximum of three total (subcontract reports and / or subcontract plan audits). |
| 85 | L.6.3.4.3 Accounting System, p. 90 | Contract | The government states " the Offeror shall provide the following information: Completed Pre-Award Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Checklist (if review of cost accounting system is in process). DCAA point of contact with a current e-mail address or phone number. DCAA Provisional Billing Rate Approval Letter. DCAA Final Billing Rate Approval Letter. DCAA/DCMA approved Forward Pricing Rate Agreement/Recommendation. DCAA/DCMA determination that the contractor’s accounting system is adequate for determining costs applicable to cost-reimbursable awards." Does the offeror have to provide both the DCAA provisional billing rate approval letter and the DCAA final billing rate approval letter? If the offeror has to provide the final billing rate approval letter, can the government clarify for which fiscal year? | Refer to Question 18. |
| 86 | L.6.4 Cost or Pricing Information and Supporting Documentation, p. 90 last sentence | Contract | "Offerors are required to segregate and identify transition-specific costs; the Government will exclude these costs from the most probable cost calculation." Will the government consider adding a transition CLIN? In In RFP Questions HDTRA1-20-R-0002 Final the Government answered the question, "Would the government consider adding a column on the Labor and Ind Rates tab of the Cost Spreadsheet to account for transition costs that are billable by the FAR." by stating, "Yes, Offerors may add a column if needed to account for further costs." | No transition CLINs will be added. Refer to Question 17 in regards to accounting for transition costs. |
| 87 | L.6.6 Government Estimates p. 91 | Contract | This section states, "For purposes of pricing, the contract award will be followed by a planned transition period (estimated at 120 days, starting approximately 16 NOV 2020) prior to requiring the fully operational capability start date of 7 April 2021." However, the POP reflected for CLIN 0001 in Section F is 11/16/2020. 120 days from 11/16/2020 is March 16, 2021 which presents a ~3 week delta in the contract start date. Can the Government please clarify which dates should be used for purposes of accurately factoring transition into pricing? | Refer to Question 21. |
| 88 | L.6.6 Government Estimates p. 91-92 | Contract | The Government indicates that historically two seats have been provided to contractors at Government Location. Would the Government please confirm the facilities requirement for the estimated ten contractors in the Albuquerque location who are not seated through contractually assigned desks? | The Government is contractually obligated to provide seats for 2 A&AS assisting RD departments assigned to KAFB, NM. Historically, this number has been higher (up to 12, which is identified as an indicator only). For any A&AS not provided a Government space, the contractor is required to provide either office space or an acceptable telework arrangement such that the employee may fulfill the PWS requirements. |
| 89 | L.6.6 Government Estimates p. 91-92, L.2.7 Security Requirements p. 74 | Contract | The Government provides two tables summarizing the FTEs at various locations. The total FTE for Ft. Belvoir (and for Albuquerque) do not match on the two tables. Would the Government please resolve the differences between the two tables? | The Security Clearancy by Location table in L.2.7 was updated to reflect the FTE Breakdown by Location table in L.6.6. |
| 90 | L.6.6, Government Estimates, p. 91, middle | Contract | Government states that one FTE is equivalent to 1,920 hours with no deviation. The Base Period includes a transition period during which contractor staff will be on boarded in phases (i.e., at different times during the transition period). Because not all contractor staff will be onboard at the start of the contract, please confirm that Offerors should pro-rate the 1,920 hours corresponding to an FTE consistent with the proposed start date of the employee during the transition phase of the Base Period. | Yes, see answer to Question 22. |
| 91 | L.6.6.1 Estimated CLIN Costs p. 92-93 | Contract | Can the Government provide an estimated breakdown of the 156 FTEs in the A&AS workforce provided across the three anticipated categories of experience and education, Entry, Mid-Level, and Senior? | The breakdown (skill leve mix) of the proposed FTEs across the anticipated categories of experience and education will be dependent upon the Offeror's approach. Note that the 156 FTE number is a historical average and may differ from the Offeror's approach. |
| 92 | L.6.6.2 Travel Pricing Assumptions, Cost Spreadsheet/ Travel CLINs p. 93 | Contract | Travel plugs are provided on page 93. However, in the cost spreadsheet attachment there is a Travel tab to provide the travel breakdown. Does the offeror have to provide a travel breakdown to equal the travel plug value, supporting documents/ supporting rationale or can the offeror insert the travel plug in the total in the travel tab for each period? | Refer to Question 59. |
| 93 | L.6.6.3 Material Pricing Assumptions, Cost Spreadsheet/ Material p. 93 | Contract | Material plugs are provided on page 93-94. However, in the cost spreadsheet attachment there is a Material-Supplies tab to provide the material breakdown. Does the offeror have to provide a material breakdown to equal the plug value, supporting documents/ supporting rationale or can the offeror insert the material plug value in the total in the Material tab for each period? Is the plug value inclusive of applicable burdens? | Refer to Question 59. |