HDQMWR-21-R-2001_Amendment 0002.pdf

PDF 112 KB Posted

Attached to
HDQMWR-21-R-2001_A-E services for Naval Base Admiral Baker South Golf Course, San Diego CA
Solicitation number
Not on record
Issued by

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PUBLIC NOTICE-HDQMWR-21-R-2001

A-E SERVICES REQUIREMENT

CNIC NAF CONSTRUCTION

NAVAL BASE DIEGO, CA

Amendment 0002 Page 1 of 2

Q1. The solicitation number is listed differently fro the mailing instructions. Should the mailing solicitation number match submittal solicitation that was used on page 2 of the RFP?

Answer: the correct solicitation number is HDQMWR-21-R-2001.

Q2. For the two Data Discs required to accompany printed submittals, may we submit USB drive or do we need to send a CD disk?

Answer: USB drives are not allowable. CD Disk must be submitted.

Q3. Can we submit our own SF330 formatted file as long as the content is identical to the SF330 forms included in the RFP?

Answer: the SF330 provided with the announcement was for reference and can be used;

however, contractors are allowed to submit their own.

Q4. Can the type size on SF330 E resumes, in the brief project description portion of the form, be smaller than 12 point Times New Roman?

Answer: No. Fonts must be no smaller than Times New Roman, 12 font type.

Q5. Past Performance-page 4 of the RFQ asks for no less than five or no more than 10 Past Perforamnce References. Should these past performances references be for the 10 projects included in the SF330 Section F or can they be for other related projects? This evaluation criteria also references Section J-2 but it is not included. Please clarify.

Answer: The A-E firm must demonstrate specialize experience and technical competences for the requirement. Section J-2 is Attachment A.

Q6. Are there any provisions for expanding the acreage of the South course to achieve the desired re-design or will the modification have to be accomplished within the existing footprint of the golf course?

Answer: The re-design shall be done within the exisiting footprint. The designer will be able to modify the size of the holes and greens.

Q7. Are there any stormwater, drainage, and/or flooding issues that need to be addressed on the golf course?

Answer: Yes, there are stormwater, drainage and footing issues that need to be addressed on the golf course. Additional information will be provided after the board selects a firm.

Q8. What is the current land use of the triangular shaped parcel between holes 5 and 6? Can this land be considered/incorprated for the course re-design?

Answer: The course is a practicing putting green and can be re-designed to be more efficient.

Q9. Are there any existing or planned on site wells to supplement the irrigation supply?

Anwer: The San Diego River is used during extreme drought. There are no other existing or planned wells.

Amendment 0002 Page 2 of 2

Q10. In regards to Phase One: will new irrigation be part of the project and more importantly, will a new irrigation pump station and subsequent pump house be required?

Answer: Yes, the new irrigation system, pump station, and house will be part of this Scope of Work.

Q11. Pursuant to RFQ Section VIII,it is unusual to prepare a separate SF330 Part I for the prime and each subconsultant where a SF330 Part II only is required for the prime and each team member. Please confirm whether one SF330 Part 1 shall be prepared inclusive of information for all team members (with Part II for all team members) or if a separate SF330 Part 1 shall be prepared. If separate, do they need to be in separate binders?

Answer: Part 1 relates to the specific experience of the firm. It should present the qualifications listed in the announcement as they relate to the prime and any sub-contractor used for the project. The evaluation factors set forth in the announcement are as follows: Specialized Experience and Technical Competences, Professional Qualifications, Past Performance, and Capacity. Part II submittal is the general resume of the firm’s capabilites and describe the overall capabilities and different types of projects that a firm is capable of performing. This information is for both the Prime and the subs used for the project.

Q12. What is the estimated construction cost funding limitation?

Answer: The estimated construction cost funing range is $3-4 Million.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .