Exhibit 4 - Commissary Performance Evaluation.pdf
PDF 94 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SKU-Based Inventory Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HDEC05-20-R-0002
- Issued by
- Defense Commissary Agency
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HDEC05-20-R-0002 Combined Synopsis Solicitation Amend #001 Conformed.pdf | ||
| Amendment #001 to Combined Synopsis Solicitation HDEC05-20-R-0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment A - Technical Evaluation Worksheet.pdf | ||
| HDEC05-20-R-0002 Combined Synopsis Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Exhibit 1 - DeCA Form 40-106A - SKU BASED PERPETUAL INVENTORY CERTIFICATION Part A.pdf | ||
| Exhibit 3 - Contractor Performance Evaluation.pdf | ||
| Attachment B - SKU-based Inventory Services Quote Sheet - April 2020.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Exhibit 2 - DeCA Form 40-106B - SKU BASED PERPETUAL INVENTORY CERTIFICATION Part B.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INVENTORY SERVICES PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMISSARY)
STORE NAME: EVALUATOR NAME:
CONTRACT #: TITLE:
TASK ORDER #: TELEPHONE NUMBER:
COMPANY NAME:
Instructions: Fill out the form by checking the box next to the number. Once complete, send form through e-mail as an attachment to InventoryDocs@deca.mil. Please send with the following E-mail Subject Line: Store Name_Current FY_Contractor Evaluation.
KEY: 5=EXCEPTIONAL; 4=VERY GOOD; 3=SATISFACTORY; 2=MARGINAL; 1=UNSATISFACTORY
Quality of Service
1. To what degree did the Contractor’s team understand the work and PWS requirements? 5 4 3 2 1
2. How effective were the Contractor’s procedures in completing the work? 5 4 3 2 1
3. How would you describe the degree of accuracy the contractor’s team achieved? 5 4 3 2 1
4. Were the section designations thorough and well-defined? 5 4 3 2 1
5. How effective was the inventory tracking and validation processes by the contractor? 5 4 3 2 1
Schedule
1. Did the contractor contact your facility 2 weeks prior to the inventory performance date, to review and coordinate the planned service?
(5 = contacted on time; 3 = contacted late; 1 = not contacted ahead of time)
5 4 3 2 1
2. Did the contractor’s team begin work on time (also affects cost control)?
(5 = started on time; 1 = started late) 5 1
3. Did the contractor complete the inventory in the time allowed (also affects cost control)?
(5 = finished on time; 3 = over allotted time 60 min or less; 1 = over allotted time 60 min or more)
5 3 1
Management
1. How effective was the contractor in establishing and maintaining a positive working relationship before and during the inventory (customer service)? 5 4 3 2 1
2. To what extent did the contractor respond to any concerns or issues that appeared before and during the performance of the inventory (problem resolution efforts)?
5 4 3 2 1
Regulatory Compliance
1. To what extent did all contractor personnel have the proper credentials to gain entry to the installation, post, or station in a timely manner? (Unavoidable delays due to installation activities or entry procedures are not within the contractor’s control)
5 4 3 2 1
2. To what degree did the contractor provide required inventory section totals as required? 5 4 3 2 1
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: **NOTE: Ratings of 2 or below require details in the comments sections**
REVISION 13 December 2019 mailto:InventoryDocs@deca.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .