Attachment_2.pdf

Attachment 2

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

18 December 2017

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

C. Contract number: ______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________ B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________

Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

E EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level.

Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.

V VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

S SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

M MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance.

There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level;

performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

Technical Performance E V S M U N/A

T1 How effective was the contractor in developing your organization’s workforce management initiatives and efforts in support of the SAF/FME mission and how successful were the initiatives? (Please elaborate)

T2 How effective was the web-based training supports for your organization? (Please elaborate)

T3 What courseware was developed? Also, what was the instruction and administration provided for your organization and how effective was it?

(Please elaborate)

T4 Was the contractor able to utilize your organization’s internal processes to promptly respond to training issues raised working through your organizations Training Manager and how effective were they in their support? (Please elaborate)

T5 How efficient and effective was the contractor’s strategic communication processes, procedures, and products to support communication requirements in planning and developing formal documentation and how effective were they in their support? (Please elaborate)

T6 What US Government agencies/organizations did the contractor coordinate with in their Financial Management Workforce Development support and how effective were they in doing so? (Please elaborate)

T7 How effective was the contractor in Financial Analysis by developing execution plan requirements, audit readiness plans, identifying standard documentation and building metrics to provide timely information valuable in decision support. Translation of audit readiness issues into financial management operations. Perform resource management duties.

Preparation of funding documents. Provide guidance for funding questions relating to policy, regulation, and legislation regarding proper utilization of funds. Provide policy guidance and technical support to facilitate coordination, collection, analysis and reporting of resources information in support of data calls.

(Please elaborate)

T8 How effective was the contractor in providing services to include:

project leadership and communications with stakeholders; project planning and scheduling; project management, including performance monitoring and measurement; reporting and documentation associated with project/program objectives; stakeholder briefings, participation in required meetings, and related project support services and target specific course development against gap analysis identifying certification shortfalls at specific proficiency levels necessary to ensure congressionally directed Financial Management Certification was sustained? (Please elaborate)

T9 How effective was the contractor’s support in providing Appropriation Fiscal Coding Data Analysis and Management support to ensure Air Force Reserve/Guard Military Personnel fiscal coding developed and documented through architecture improvements for current and future use in business operations and for the reporting of associated military personnel information systems? (Please elaborate)

T10 How effective was the contractor in providing technical and analytical support for the development of Total Force High Velocity Analysis (HVA), which is similar to economic and business case analysis in terms of scope, analytical tools, and outputs. (Please elaborate)

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P1. How effectively was the contractor able to execute overall contract management activities (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P2. To what degree was the contractor reasonable and cooperative when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

P3. To what degree was the contractor able to timely and effectively resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

P4. How effectively did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

P5. To what degree was the contractor able to successfully respond to

Program Management E V S M U N/A emergency and/or surge situations?

P6. How effectively did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts? (Please elaborate)

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation E V S M U N/A

S1. To what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan?

S2. How effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?

Employee Retention/Attraction E V S M U N/A

E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to the following email addresses:

Frank Whorton: frank.a.whorton.civ@mail.mil

Melissa Tamayo: melissa.s.tamayo.civ@mail.mil mailto:frank.a.whorton.civ@mail.mil mailto:melissa.s.tamayo.civ@mail.mil