Questions and Answers PR.SERE RFI H9225725U0001 1.23.26.pdf
PDF 63 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PR/SERE RFI
- Solicitation number
- H9225726U0001
- Issued by
-
United States Special Operations Command
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for Request for Information (RFI) H9225725U0001 regarding PR/SERE training support services. The document does not address specific products or services, pricing terms, response dates, or award information, as it consists solely of clarifications to industry questions posed during the presolicitation phase.
Key clarifications provided include: the Government intends to award a stand-alone contract through SAM.gov rather than utilizing existing contract vehicles; military experience will not substitute for the 18-month Program or Contract Manager experience requirement; T3i did not assist in drafting the Statement of Work; specialized PR/SERE qualifications refer to sustainment training through attendance at available SERE courses; Section Leads may complete SERE348 and PR397 courses while serving in the position rather than as prerequisites; and funds have been appropriated. The Government will evaluate past performance based on recency and relevancy, with consideration for subcontractor performance; will evaluate offerors' transition plans and capability to achieve full operational capability; will assess both existing instructor qualifications at proposal submission and demonstrated capability to recruit and qualify instructors within Government timelines; and will evaluate staffing and management approaches including instructor retention strategies, surge management, and backfill timelines.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFI H9225726U0001.pdf | ||
| PR_SERE Draft SOW.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PR/SERE RFI: H9225725U0001
Questions and Answers
Question 1: Has the Government determined a Procurement strategy i.e. SCS, or other contract vehicles?
ANSWER 1: The Government intends to award a stand-alone contract solicited through SAM.gov.
Question 2: For the Task Lead, will the Government consider similar military experience for the 18 months of experience as a Program or Contract Manage?
ANSWER 2: No.
Question 3: “T3i personnel are considered essential personnel”. Did T3i assist in writing this SOW?
ANSWER 3: No.
Question 4: "The contractor shall ensure all personnel are able to meet and maintain all HRTI requirements and continue to earn further specialized PR/SERE qualifications throughout the duration of the contract." Can the Government clarify these further specialized PR/SERE qualifications?
ANSWER 4: This is sustainment training achieved by attending available SERE courses to enhance capabilities further.
Question 5: Section Lead (SL)SERE Instructor: 3.2.5 "Successfully complete the following courses or equivalent experience (if applicable): SERE370, SERE360, SERE350, SERE348, PR303 and PR397." Can the government clarify if SERE 348 and PR 397 are prerequisites to employment or would the Section Lead be able to complete the courses while serving in the position?
ANSWER 5: The Section Lead may complete these courses while serving in the position.
Question 6: Have funds been appropriated or is it contingent?
ANSWER 6: Funds have been appropriated.
Question 7: How does the Government anticipate evaluating past performance for this requirement, including the criteria used to determine relevance (e.g., SOF training support, instructor-led training, high-risk training environments, personnel transition experience)? Additionally, will subcontractor’s past performance be considered as part of the overall past performance evaluation?
ANSWER 7: Past Performance will be based on recency and relevancy.
Subcontractor’s past performance may be considered.
Question 8: Does the Government anticipate including a separately evaluated transition or phase-in approach in the future solicitation, and if so, will demonstrated experience achieving full operational capability on similar instructor-intensive contracts be considered during evaluation?
ANSWER 8: The Government intends to evaluate the offerors’ transition plan.
Question 9: Does the Government anticipate prioritizing existing instructor qualifications at the time of proposal submission, or demonstrated capability to recruit, onboard, and qualify instructors within Government-directed timelines, as part of the evaluation process?
ANSWER 9: Both capabilities will be evaluated.
Question 10: Does the Government anticipate evaluating the proposed staffing and management approach as a distinct evaluation factor, to include instructor retention strategies, surge management, and backfill timelines?
ANSWER 10: The Government intends to evaluate the staffing and management approach.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .