H9225724R0024 .pdf

PDF 548 KB Posted

Attached to
MARFORSOC PR/SERE AV Equipment/Maintenance
Solicitation number
H9225724R0024
Issued by

About this file

This document is a solicitation (H9225724R0024) for the procurement of replacement equipment and maintenance services for the Marine Raider Training Center in Sneads Ferry, North Carolina.

The key details are:

  • The government is seeking a contractor to provide parts and installation of replacement equipment, as well as warranty and maintenance services, for a 1-year base period with 4 one-year option periods.
  • A site visit is scheduled for July 26, 2024, and proposals are due by August 5, 2024.
  • The procurement is set aside for small businesses, with the NAICS code 811210 and a size standard of $34,000,000.
  • The government will evaluate proposals based on technical, past performance, and price factors using a best value tradeoff approach.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
24R0024 Amend 0002 CONFORM.pdf PDF
24R0024 Amend 0002.pdf PDF
24R0024 Amend 0001.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

H9225724R0024 23-Jul-2024

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

910-440-0731

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

12:00 PM 05 Aug 2024

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

H922579. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

ALLISON C ODONNELL

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

M209104584686-0001

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR X

SMALL BUSINESSX

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

MARSOC CONTRACTING

PO BOX 20117

CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28542

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE M20910 16. ADMINISTERED BY

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

MARINE RAIDER TRAINING CENTER

BENJAMIN BLICK

BLDG RR465

SNEADS FERRY NC 28460

TEL: 910-440-0026 FAX:

FAX:

TEL: 910-440-0731

SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

$34,000,000

NAICS:

811210

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF47

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

H9225724R0024

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Lot Parts and Installation

FFP

Installation of replacement equipment SHALL be conducted from Septemeber 23, 2024 - September 30, 2024.

Exact location will be provided at time of award.

See attached statement of work and bill of materials for additional detail.

FOB: Destination

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: M209104584686-0001

PSC CD: 7E20

NET AMT

0002 12 Months Warranty and Maintenance

FFP

See attached statement of work for additional details.

FOB: Destination

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: M209104584686-0001

0003 12 Months OPTION Warranty and Maintenance

FFP

See attached statement of work for additional details.

FOB: Destination

0004 12 Months OPTION Warranty and Maintenance

FFP

See attached statement of work for additional details.

0005 12 Months OPTION Warranty and Maintenance

FFP

See attached statement of work for additional details.

0006 12 Months OPTION Warranty and Maintenance

FFP

See attached statement of work for additional details.

0007 6 Months OPTION Warranty and Maintenance

FFP

See attached statement of work for additional details.

Reference 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services for additional information.

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

0002 Destination Government Destination Government

0003 Destination Government Destination Government

0004 Destination Government Destination Government

0005 Destination Government Destination Government

0006 Destination Government Destination Government

0007 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 POP 23-SEP-2024 TO

30-SEP-2024

N/A MARINE RAIDER TRAINING CENTER

BENJAMIN BLICK

BLDG RR465

SNEADS FERRY NC 28460

910-440-0026

M20910

0002 POP 23-SEP-2024 TO

22-SEP-2025

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0003 POP 23-SEP-2024 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0004 POP 23-SEP-2024 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0005 POP 23-SEP-2024 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0006 POP 23-SEP-2024 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0007 POP 23-SEP-2024 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.201-1 Acquisition 360: Voluntary Survey SEP 2023

52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984

52.203-6 Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government JUN 2020

52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal

Transactions

JUN 2020

52.204-2 Security Requirements MAR 2021

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018

52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011

52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier

Subcontract Awards

JUN 2020

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018

52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting AUG 2020

52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance AUG 2020

52.204-25 Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment

NOV 2021

52.204-27 Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application JUN 2023

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting

With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for

Debarment

NOV 2021

52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding

Responsibility Matters

OCT 2018

52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic

Corporations

NOV 2015

52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Products and

Commercial Services

NOV 2023

52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990

52.219-6 Notice Of Total Small Business Set-Aside NOV 2020

52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003

52.222-42 Statement Of Equivalent Rates For Federal Hires MAY 2014

52.222-43 Fair Labor Standards Act And Service Contract Labor

Standards - Price Adjustment (Multiple Year And Option

Contracts)

AUG 2018

52.232-18 Availability Of Funds APR 1984

52.232-19 Availability Of Funds For The Next Fiscal Year APR 1984

52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award

Management

OCT 2018

52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013

52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

MAR 2023

52.233-2 Service Of Protest SEP 2006

52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996

52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004

52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995

252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991

252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights DEC 2022

252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2022

252.204-7004 Antiterrorism Awareness Training for Contractors JAN 2023

252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

Controls

OCT 2016

252.204-7009 Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Third-Party

Contractor Reported Cyber Incident Information

JAN 2023

252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber

Incident Reporting

JAN 2023

252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation

Support

JAN 2023

252.204-7016 Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services

-- Representation

DEC 2019

252.204-7017 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense

Telecommunications Equipment or Services -- Representation

MAY 2021

252.204-7018 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense

Telecommunications Equipment or Services

JAN 2023

252.204-7024 Notice on the Use of the Supplier Performance Risk System MAR 2023

252.223-7008 Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium JAN 2023

252.225-7001 Buy American and Balance of Payments Program FEB 2024

252.225-7002 Qualifying Country Sources As Subcontractors MAR 2022

252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities APR 2022

252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013

252.225-7052 Restriction on the Acquisition of Certain Magnets, Tantalum, and Tungsten.

JAN 2023

252.225-7055 Representation Regarding Business Operations with the

Maduro Regime

MAY 2022

252.225-7056 Prohibition Regarding Business Operations with the Maduro

Regime

JAN 2023

252.225-7059 Prohibition on Certain Procurements from the Xinjiang

Uyghur Autonomous Region - Representation

JUN 2023

252.225-7060 Prohibition on Certain Procurements from the Xinjiang

Uyghur Autonomous Region

JUN 2023

252.226-7001 Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian-Owned Economic

Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns

JAN 2023

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006

252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor

Personnel

JAN 2023

252.239-7009 Representation of Use of Cloud Computing SEP 2015

252.239-7010 Cloud Computing Services JAN 2023

252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2022

252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Products or Commercial

Services

NOV 2023

252.246-7008 Sources of Electronic Parts JAN 2023

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO

SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (NOV 2021)

The Offeror shall not complete the representation at paragraph (d)(1) of this provision if the Offeror has represented that it "does not provide covered telecommunications equipment or services as a part of its offered products or services to the Government in the performance of any contract, subcontract, or other contractual instrument" in paragraph (c)(1) in the provision at 52.204-26, Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services--

Representation, or in paragraph (v)(2)(i) of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-

Commercial Products and Commercial Services. The Offeror shall not complete the representation in paragraph

(d)(2) of this provision if the Offeror has represented that it "does not use covered telecommunications equipment or services, or any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services" in paragraph (c)(2) of the provision at 52.204-26, or in paragraph (v)(2)(ii) of the provision at 52.212-3.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision-

Backhaul, covered telecommunications equipment or services, critical technology, interconnection arrangements, reasonable inquiry, roaming, and substantial or essential component have the meanings provided in the clause

52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or

Equipment.

(b) Prohibition.

(1) Section 889(a)(1)(A) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L.

115-232) prohibits the head of an executive agency on or after August 13, 2019, from procuring or obtaining, or extending or renewing a contract to procure or obtain, any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. Nothing in the prohibition shall be construed to--

(i) Prohibit the head of an executive agency from procuring with an entity to provide a service that connects to the facilities of a third-party, such as backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements; or

(ii) Cover telecommunications equipment that cannot route or redirect user data traffic or cannot permit visibility into any user data or packets that such equipment transmits or otherwise handles.

(2) Section 889(a)(1)(B) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L.

115-232) prohibits the head of an executive agency on or after August 13, 2020, from entering into a contract or extending or renewing a contract with an entity that uses any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. This prohibition applies to the use of covered telecommunications equipment or services, regardless of whether that use is in performance of work under a Federal contract. Nothing in the prohibition shall be construed to--

(i) Prohibit the head of an executive agency from procuring with an entity to provide a service that connects to the facilities of a third-party, such as backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements; or

(ii) Cover telecommunications equipment that cannot route or redirect user data traffic or cannot permit visibility into any user data or packets that such equipment transmits or otherwise handles.

(c) Procedures. The Offeror shall review the list of excluded parties in the System for Award Management (SAM)

(https://www.sam.gov) for entities excluded from receiving federal awards for "covered telecommunications equipment or services."

(d) Representations. The Offeror represents that--

(1) It [ ___ ] will, [ ___ ] will not provide covered telecommunications equipment or services to the Government in the performance of any contract, subcontract or other contractual instrument resulting from this solicitation. The

Offeror shall provide the additional disclosure information required at paragraph (e)(1) of this section if the Offeror responds "will" in paragraph (d)(1) of this section; and

(2) After conducting a reasonable inquiry, for purposes of this representation, the Offeror represents that--

It [ ___ ] does, [ ___ ] does not use covered telecommunications equipment or services, or use any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services. The Offeror shall provide the additional disclosure information required at paragraph (e)(2) of this section if the Offeror responds "does" in paragraph (d)(2) of this section.

(e) Disclosures.

(1) Disclosure for the representation in paragraph (d)(1) of this provision. If the Offeror has responded "will" in the representation in paragraph (d)(1) of this provision, the Offeror shall provide the following information as part of the offer:

(i) For covered equipment--

(A) The entity that produced the covered telecommunications equipment (include entity name, unique entity identifier, CAGE code, and whether the entity was the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) or a distributor, if known);

(B) A description of all covered telecommunications equipment offered (include brand; model number, such as

OEM number, manufacturer part number, or wholesaler number; and item description, as applicable); and

(C) Explanation of the proposed use of covered telecommunications equipment and any factors relevant to determining if such use would be permissible under the prohibition in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.

(ii) For covered services--

(A) If the service is related to item maintenance: A description of all covered telecommunications services offered

(include on the item being maintained: Brand; model number, such as OEM number, manufacturer part number, or wholesaler number; and item description, as applicable); or

(B) If not associated with maintenance, the Product Service Code (PSC) of the service being provided; and explanation of the proposed use of covered telecommunications services and any factors relevant to determining if such use would be permissible under the prohibition in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.

(2) Disclosure for the representation in paragraph (d)(2) of this provision. If the Offeror has responded "does" in the representation in paragraph (d)(2) of this provision, the Offeror shall provide the following information as part of the offer:

(i) For covered equipment--

(A) The entity that produced the covered telecommunications equipment (include entity name, unique entity identifier, CAGE code, and whether the entity was the OEM or a distributor, if known);

(B) A description of all covered telecommunications equipment offered (include brand; model number, such as

OEM number, manufacturer part number, or wholesaler number; and item description, as applicable); and

(C) Explanation of the proposed use of covered telecommunications equipment and any factors relevant to determining if such use would be permissible under the prohibition in paragraph (b)(2) of this provision.

(ii) For covered services--

(A) If the service is related to item maintenance: A description of all covered telecommunications services offered

(include on the item being maintained: Brand; model number, such as OEM number, manufacturer part number, or wholesaler number; and item description, as applicable); or

(B) If not associated with maintenance, the PSC of the service being provided; and explanation of the proposed use of covered telecommunications services and any factors relevant to determining if such use would be permissible under the prohibition in paragraph (b)(2) of this provision.

(End of provision)

52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT 2018)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Administrative proceeding means a non-judicial process that is adjudicatory in nature in order to make a determination of fault or liability (e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Proceedings, Civilian

Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings, and Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings). This includes administrative proceedings at the Federal and State level but only in connection with performance of a

Federal contract or grant. It does not include agency actions such as contract audits, site visits, corrective plans, or inspection of deliverables.

Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000 means--

(1) The total value of all current, active contracts and grants, including all priced options; and

(2) The total value of all current, active orders including all priced options under indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, 8(a), or requirements contracts (including task and delivery and multiple-award Schedules).

Principal means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The offeror ( ) has ( ) does not have current active Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than

$10,000,000.

(c) If the offeror checked “has” in paragraph (b) of this provision, the offeror represents, by submission of this offer, that the information it has entered in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is current, accurate, and complete as of the date of submission of this offer with regard to the following information:

(1) Whether the offeror, and/or any of its principals, has or has not, within the last five years, in connection with the award to or performance by the offeror of a Federal contract or grant, been the subject of a proceeding, at the

Federal or State level that resulted in any of the following dispositions:

(i) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.

(ii) In a civil proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in the payment of a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, or damages of $5,000 or more.

(iii) In an administrative proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in--

(A) The payment of a monetary fine or penalty of $5,000 or more; or

(B) The payment of a reimbursement, restitution, or damages in excess of $100,000.

(iv) In a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, a disposition of the matter by consent or compromise with an acknowledgment of fault by the Contractor if the proceeding could have led to any of the outcomes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), or (c)(1)(iii) of this provision.

(2) If the offeror has been involved in the last five years in any of the occurrences listed in (c)(1) of this provision, whether the offeror has provided the requested information with regard to each occurrence.

(d) The offeror shall post the information in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iv) of this provision in FAPIIS as required through maintaining an active registration in the System for Award Management, which can be accessed via https://www.sam.gov (see 52.204-7).

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

(SEP 2023)

https://www.sam.gov/

ADDENDUM 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions.

(1) All questions concerning this procurement, either technical or contractual must be submitted in writing, via email, to the Contracting Office. The deadline for submittal of questions regarding this solicitation is 12:00 pm

Eastern Standard Time (EST) on 30 July 2024. The Government’s responses will be provided via solicitation/RFP amendment. No direct exchanges between the technical representative and a prospective Offeror shall be conducted unless it is deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer. Questions shall be submitted via email to: allison.c.odonnell.mil@socom.mil and Samuel.williams1@socom.mil.

SITE VISIT - A site visit will be conducted on July 26, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. For instructions on obtaining temporary base access please contact SSgt Allison O’Donnell at allison.c.odonnell.mil@socom.mil no later than 12:00 pm on

July 25, 2024 to ensure adequate time for submission of required documentation. The site visit is recommended for all companies interested in submitting a proposal for this requirement to mitigate questions and to offer a better understanding of the locations included in this requirement. Additional information such as meeting location will be sent via email after all interested parties have contacted SSgt O’Donnell requesting for base access instructions.

Vendors MUST contact SSgt O’Donnell if they plan on attending to ensure all parties are present before moving from the meeting location to follow on locations.

(2) Proposals must be received no later than 12:00 PM Eastern Standard Time (EST) on 5 August 2024.

Proposals received after this time frame shall not be considered for award. The Government will award the contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer is conforming to the solicitation and will be the most advantageous to the Government. The prospective offeror must be registered with the System for Award

Management (SAM) website at http://www.sam.gov under the appropriate NAICS code that is associated to this requirement to be considered for award. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its proposal firm for 180 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of proposals. All proposals must be submitted via email, no other form of submission will be accepted. Proposals shall be emailed to: allison.c.odonnell.mil@socom.mil and

Samuel.williams1@socom.mil.

Offerors must provide the following information in their proposal: UEI #, CAGE CODE #, and TIN #

Proposals must be submitted in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f). For email proposals, the Government office designated for receipt of the proposal are the email inbox of the addressee’s indicated above. Receipt of an electronic acknowledgment from the addressee establishes that a record was received but does not establish that the content sent corresponds to the content received. Email attachments are limited to no more than 10 MB. Vendors are specifically warned that email may be subjected to spam filters or attachment stripping. It is therefore highly recommended that vendors request and receive delivery confirmation prior to the closing date.

All transmissions must clearly state the solicitation number and the name of the contracting specialist on the first page to ensure proper receipt.

(3) Comprehensive responses to the requirements of this RFP are required to enable the Government to evaluate the

Offeror’s understanding of capability and approaches to accomplish the stated requirements. Proposals shall be submitted per the instructions herein, and non-conformance with the specified required content may be cause for rejection of the proposal. The proposal shall provide comprehensive responses to the areas provided for in this section. The proposal shall be a complete response to Attachment 1 –Statement of Work and the requirements of this

RFP, taking into consideration required quantities and delivery schedules specified in this solicitation. The successful Offeror will be selected based on an evaluation of proposals as outlined in FAR 52.212-2, incorporated below.

(4) Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale in their proposal.

Proposal Format and Content.

Electronic proposals shall contain separate files for each of the (4) volumes. Individual emails shall not exceed

10 MB.

The proposal page format will be 8 1/2” x 11”. A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information. Type shall not be less than 10 pitch. Margins shall be 1” all-around for all pages. Elaborate formats or color presentations are not desired or required. Cover sheets, glossaries, and Table of Contents (TOCs) are not required. If included, they will not count towards page count limits. Failure to provide all required documents may render the proposal unacceptable.

Proposal submission requirements are the following:

The evaluation will consist of evaluating the Qualifying Criteria (Volume I) and the three Factors (Volumes II, III and IV), as outlined below. The Government intends to award a single award as a result of this solicitation.

Proposals shall not contain classified information.

Qualifying Criteria (Volume I): All listed qualifying criteria submissions will be evaluated on a pass or fail basis.

The qualifying criteria shall be submitted in accordance with the instructions contained in this solicitation.

Complete business address of the Offeror, the corporate name to be used on any resultant contract, and the remittance address if different from that above. If this name does not identify a "parent company" or sponsoring

"corporation" name, also provide such identity, as appropriate.

− The Offeror’s Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number and

Tax Identification Number (TIN).

− Name, telephone numbers and e-mail address of person(s) to be contacted for clarification or questions to the proposal.

− Fill-In Clauses: provide all fill-ins or certifications required by the solicitation, for inclusion in any resulting contract.

− Terms and Conditions: The Offeror must include a statement that it either (a) agrees to the terms and conditions of this solicitation (which consists of the entire RFP, including all documents, exhibits, and other attachments that are incorporated therein by reference and made a part thereof) and any solicitation amendments; or (b) takes exceptions to any terms or conditions of the solicitation, and clearly identifies those exceptions. Exceptions to any of the terms and conditions of this RFP may be considered by the Government to be unacceptable.

− Specific Proposal validity period required minimum is 180-days.

− Vendors must demonstrate the ability to comply with the Facility Clearance Draft DD254 (Attachment #3)

− The Offeror shall limit the Qualifying Volume to 3 pages.

Factor I: Technical (Volume II): This volume shall be prepared IAW the evaluation criteria below, Evaluation

Factors for Award. Proposals shall address the Offeror’s technical capabilities to accomplish the work by providing specific narrative details and/ or description of actual methods, processes and procedures for providing the services described in the solicitation Attachment 1 – Statement of Work (SOW). General statements that the Offeror understands the requirement and shall comply with the requirements of the RFP will be considered inadequate.

Offerors are cautioned not to rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements in the proposal but furnish convincing narratives describing “how” they intend to meet these requirements. The Offeror shall limit the

Technical Volume to 10 pages. Two (2) copies of Volume II are required, a complete - Company specific copy

(Limited to 10 Pages), and a ‘redacted’ copy (Limited to 10 Pages). THE REDACTED COPY OF VOLUME II

MUST REMOVE ALL COMPANY SPECIFIC LOGOS, OR NAMES (TO INCLUDE PERSONNEL) THAT

SPECIFICALLY TIE THE VOLUME TO THE COMPANY SUBMITTING THE PROPOSAL.

a. The Offerors Technical Capability Plan to fully execute the requirements of the SOW shall include a detailed a description of how the Offeror will maintain call/text/email system trouble shooting support and guaranteed response times as detailed in the SOW.

b. The plan shall identify the Offeror’s ability to meet all security requirements (facility and personnel), procedures and policies, risk mitigation techniques, flexibility, and experience that when viewed collectively demonstrates the

Offeror’s ability to successfully execute contract performance while minimizing impacts to the mission.

c. The Offeror shall detail the extent to which their plan includes equipment repair and replacement, as well as the ordering processes for replacement equipment as detailed in the SOW.

Factor II: Past Performance. (Volume III): Offerors should provide at least one (1) prior or current contracts/agreements for similar scoped projects performed in whole or part during the past three (3) years. The submitting offeror should submit relevant and recent past performance similar in scope and magnitude in this combined synopsis/solicitation. Include contract/agreement number, period of performance, reference name, reference telephone number, reference e-mail, and contract/agreement information.

The Government will evaluate each offeror’s past performance based on the references provided during the past three years previous (recent) and the relevance to the work that will be required under the resultant contract. Vendor format is acceptable. The Past Performance (Volume III) shall be limited to 15 pages (no more than 3 past/present performance submissions and each submission shall be 5 pages or less).

Recent and Relevant Contracts. Recent is defined as an action within the past three (3) years. Relevancy will be determined based on contract references reflecting past and present performance over the past three (3) years which is relevant to scope and magnitude of the requirement contain in this synopsis/solicitation, and attached SOW.

Factor III: Price (Volume IV): The Offeror must fill in pricing information in Section B of the Standard Form

1449. The Offeror shall provide a price volume narrative that explains how rates were calculated, which includes the submission of a price list that delineates hourly costs per laborer. Additionally, vendor shall include documentation that supports the proposed pricing that may include but is not limited to a published pricing list, etc. The Price

(Volume IV) narrative is limited to 10 pages.

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014) TEMPLATE (TRADEOFF)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers: Qualifying Criteria, Technical, Past Performance, and Price.

Qualifying Criteria will be evaluated first on a Pass/Fail basis. If the proposal does not pass, no further evaluation will be conducted, and the proposal will not be considered for award. Factor 1 – Technical will be evaluated next. If the proposal is rated Unacceptable/Red, Past Performance and Price will not be evaluated, and the proposal will not be considered for award.

(b) The Government intends to award a single Firm Fixed Price type contract to the responsible vendor whose overall proposal represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the solicitation. To arrive at a selection decision, the Contracting Officer will perform an integrated assessment using the evaluation factors described in this solicitation. This may result in awards being made to the higher rated, potentially higher priced proposal(s) where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors. This is a competitive, best value trade-off selection that will be conducted in accordance with (IAW) with FAR parts 15, 12 & 13, as supplemented by the

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) and Special Operations Federal Acquisition

Regulation Supplement (SOFARS). The following factors will be used to evaluate proposals and are in descending order of importance; Technical, Past Performance and Price. The order of importance for the evaluation factors is 1)

Technical, 2) Past Performance, and 3) Price. When combined, Technical and Past Performance are more important than price.

(i) Factor I: Technical: The offerors approach to performing contract requirements and its capability to successfully perform the contract in accordance with Performance Work Statement. Evaluation of this factor will focus on the significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses and deficiencies of the proposal.

A. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Technical Capability plan demonstrates an understanding of how to successfully maintain call/text/email system trouble shooting support and guaranteed response times as detailed in the SOW. A feasible, realistic plan that mitigates disruption of schedule, degradation of performance, and/or the need for increased

Government oversight represents a low risk to contract performance, and a higher rating will result.

B. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror’s plan, processes, and procedures demonstrate the ability to successfully meet all security requirements (facility and personnel), procedures and policies, risk mitigation techniques, flexibility, and experience that when viewed collectively demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to successfully execute contract performance while minimizing impacts to the mission. The Government will determine whether the proposal meets the requirements in the PWS and to what degree the proposed approach indicates an understanding of the requirements per the definitions contained within Technical:

Combined Color/ Risk Ratings chart below.

C. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror’s plan, processes, and procedures demonstrate the ability to successfully execute equipment repair and replacement, as well as the ordering processes for replacement equipment as detailed in the SOW.

D. If an Offeror’s Capability Plan demonstrates a material failure to meet a Government requirement, it is a deficiency in the Offeror’s proposal. The Government will determine if the plan meets or exceeds SOW requirements, to what degree the proposed approach indicates an understanding of the requirements, and the level of risk to unsuccessful performance per the color rating definitions contained within the Technical: Combined Color/ Risk Ratings chart below.

Identified strengths may be incorporated into any resultant contract award (i.e., added to the SOW, added as a Section H clause, etc.) as appropriate.

Technical Ratings – The following ratings will be applied to Factor 1 during evaluations. These ratings will also be assigned as an overall evaluated rating of the proposal.

Technical: Combined Color/ Risk Ratings

Color Adjectival

Rating

Description

Blue Outstanding

Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements, contains multiple strengths and / or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good

Proposal demonstrates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable

Proposal demonstrates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal

Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and / or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is un-awardable, and / or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

(i) When conducting evaluations of Factor 1, the below definitions will be utilized:

Finding Definition

Significant

Strength

An aspect of an Offeror’s proposal with appreciable merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the considerable advantage of the government during contract performance.

Strength An aspect of an offeror's proposal with merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the advantage of the government during contract performance.

Weakness A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

Significant

Weakness

A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR

15.001.

Deficiency

A material failure of a proposal to meet a government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

Risk, as it pertains to source selection, is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance.

The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or subfactor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. (For firm-fixed-price contracts, the reference to increased cost may be removed from the risk definition.)

(ii) Factor 2: Past Performance. The Government will evaluate Past Performance based on the submission required in the provision 52.212-1 identified above. In addition to the offeror’s past performance submission the government may use the data available in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) during this evaluation. In evaluating Past Performance, the Government will consider the recency and relevancy of the past performance to the requirements contained in the SOW, the risk to successful performance, and the Government’s confidence in the offeror’s ability to successfully perform the solicited requirements. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

a. When making relevancy determinations, the below definitions will be utilized:

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

b. To be considered Recent, past performance must have been performed whole or in part during the past 3 years of the closing date of this RFP.

c. Past Performance Ratings – The following ratings will be applied to Factor 2 during evaluations.

Adjectival Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(iii) Factor 3: Price. The evaluated price will be determined using the total price for base and all option years. The offeror’s proposed price will be evaluated per FAR 13.106-

3(a). Offerors responding to this solicitation are advised that, prior to award, the

Government may request offerors to submit information/data to support price reasonableness such as copies of paid invoices for the same or similar items, sales history for the same or similar items, price list with effective date and/or copies of catalog pages along with any applicable discounts. Failure to submit the requested information may result in disqualification of the submitted proposal.

a. Included in the solicitation and resulting contract is FAR Clause 52.217-8, the price of exercising this clause will be evaluated using the prices of the last option year period submitted in the vendor’s proposal.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) The Government intends to award solely on the information contained in the proposal and intends to award without discussions. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed necessary.

(d) Although price is not the most important evaluation factor, it has the potential to become more significant during the evaluation process. The degree of importance of price will increase with the degree of equality of the proposals in relation to the other factors on which selection is to be based. The importance of price will also increase when a vendor’s price is so significantly high as to diminish the value to the Government that might be gained under the other aspects of the offer. If, at any stage of the evaluation, all vendors are determined to have submitted equal, or virtually equal, proposals, price could become the factor in determining which vendors shall receive the award.

(e) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the

Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

52.212-3 OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND

COMMERCIAL SERVICES (MAY 2024)

The Offeror shall complete only paragraph (b) of this provision if the Offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically in the System for Award Management (SAM) accessed through https://www.sam.gov. If the Offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically, the Offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (v) of this provision.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision --

"Covered telecommunications equipment or services" has the meaning provided in the clause 52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

"Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) concern" means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States and who are economically disadvantaged in accordance with 13 CFR part 127, and the concern is certified by SBA or an approved third-party certifier in accordance with 13 CFR 127.300. It automatically qualifies as a women-owned small business eligible under the WOSB Program.

"Forced or indentured child labor" means all work or service-

(1) Exacted from any person under the age of 18 under the menace of any penalty for its nonperformance and for which the worker does not offer himself voluntarily; or

(2) Performed by any person under the age of 18 pursuant to a contract the enforcement of which can be accomplished by process or penalties.

"Highest-level owner" means the entity that owns or controls an immediate owner of the offeror, or that owns or controls one or more entities that control an immediate owner of the offeror. No entity owns or exercises control of the highest level owner.

"Immediate owner" means an entity, other than the offeror, that has direct control of the offeror. Indicators of control include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: Ownership or interlocking management, identity of interests among family members, shared facilities and equipment, and the common use of employees.

"Inverted domestic corporation" means a foreign incorporated entity that meets the definition of an inverted domestic corporation under 6 U.S.C. 395(b), applied in accordance with the rules and definitions of 6 U.S.C. 395(c).

"Manufactured end product" means any end product in product and service codes (PSCs) 1000-9999, except--

(1) PSC 5510, Lumber and Related Basic Wood Materials;

(2) Product or Service Group (PSG) 87, Agricultural Supplies;

(3) PSG 88, Live Animals;

https://www.sam.gov/

(4) PSG 89, Subsistence;

(5) PSC 9410, Crude Grades of Plant Materials;

(6) PSC 9430, Miscellaneous Crude Animal Products, Inedible;

(7) PSC 9440, Miscellaneous Crude Agricultural and Forestry Products;

(8) PSC 9610, Ores;

(9) PSC 9620, Minerals, Natural and Synthetic; and

(10) PSC 9630, Additive Metal Materials.

"Place of manufacture" means the place where an end product is assembled out of components, or otherwise made or processed from raw materials into the finished product that is to be provided to the Government. If a product is disassembled and reassembled, the place of reassembly is not the place of manufacture.

"Predecessor" means an entity that is replaced by a successor and includes any predecessors of the predecessor.

"Reasonable inquiry" has the meaning provided in the clause 52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain

Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

"Restricted business operations" means business operations in Sudan that include power production activities, mineral extraction activities, oil-related activities, or the production of military equipment, as those terms are defined in the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-174). Restricted business operations do not include business operations that the person (as that term is defined in Section 2 of the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act of 2007) conducting the business can demonstrate--

(1) Are conducted under contract directly and exclusively with the regional government of southern Sudan;

(2) Are conducted pursuant to specific authorization from the Office of Foreign Assets Control in the Department of the Treasury, or are expressly exempted under Federal law from the requirement to be conducted under such authorization;

(3) Consist of providing goods or services to marginalized populations of Sudan;

(4) Consist of providing goods or services to an internationally recognized peacekeeping force or humanitarian organization;

(5) Consist of providing goods or services that are used only to promote health or education; or

(6) Have been voluntarily suspended.

"Sensitive technology"--

(1) Means hardware, software, telecommunications equipment, or any other technology that is to be used specifically--

(i) To restrict the free flow of unbiased information in Iran; or

(ii) To disrupt, monitor, or otherwise restrict speech of the people of Iran; and

(2) Does not include information or informational…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .