RFI_20250908.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Storage Cage Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- H9224025Q2043
- Issued by
- United States Special Operations Command
About this file
This Request for Information (RFI) document contains four clarifying questions and responses regarding a storage cage solicitation for the United States Special Operations Command. The procurement is for one high-bay storage cage to be installed at JEB Little Creek-Fort Story, with a 100% Small Business Set-Aside designation. Key technical details include specific installation requirements such as hard-anchoring the cage framework to the east concrete wall, using U-bolts at the mezzanine flooring, and matching the existing cages' gray finish.
The RFI addresses technical specifications including finish options (powder coat or liquid paint), color matching for the cage, and installation timeline. Responses indicate flexibility in finish application, with the awardee responsible for matching existing cage colors, and confirm a 60-day delivery/installation period after award, which may extend beyond the initially proposed 30 September 2025 deadline. The solicitation number is H9224025Q2043, and a site visit was scheduled for 4 September 2025 from 0900-1030 Eastern time.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 - Product Description_20250827.pdf | ||
| RFQ_H9224025Q2043.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Requests for Information | |||||
| # | Question | Response | Date Provided | ||
| 1 | Regarding: Attachment 1 – Product Description - Page 1 - Para 3.3.2 (27 Aug 2025), requirement to “anchor to the east concrete wall” and use U-bolts at the mezzanine flooring. | ||||
| Q: When attaching the cage to the east concrete wall, do you require a woven mesh/chain link panel along that interface, or should we hard-anchor the cage framework directly to the wall without additional mesh/chain link up against the concrete wall? | Hard-anchor the cage framework directly to the wall without additional mesh/chain link up against the concrete wall. | 8-Sep-25 | |||
| 2 | Regarding Attachment 1 – Product Description - Page 1 - Para 3.3.1 (27 Aug 2025), finish requirement stating cage structural members to match the existing cages’ gray finish. | ||||
| Q: Do you prefer a powder-coat finish or a shop-applied liquid paint system to meet the specified gray finish? If there is no preference, we will propose a powder coat for durability, unless liquid paint is required for color matching. | No preference | 8-Sep-25 | |||
| 3 | Regarding: Attachment 1 – Product Description - Page 1 - Para 3.3.1 (27 Aug 2025), finish/color-matching requirement to “match existing cages” in the space. | ||||
| Q: If liquid paint is acceptable/required, please confirm the brand and exact color name or code that matches the surrounding cages. If a powder specification exists for the same gray, please provide the powder manufacturer code as well. | Exact color specs are unknown. Will be incumbent on the awardee to match the finish. | 8-Sep-25 | |||
| 4 | Q: Is 30 September 2025 a hard deadline for on-site installation completion, or should we plan for the RFQ’s 60-day after award requirement? If the award is close to 30 Sept, would delivery/install NTE 60 days ARO be acceptable? | 60 days aftwer award is the expected delivery date. Product Description will be updated. | 8-Sep-25 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .