Attachment_III_-_QASP_ _Matrix_-_final.doc
DOC document 55 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- H92240-15-T-0125
- Issued by
-
United States Special Operations Command
About this file
Attachment III - QASP / QASP Matrix
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| H92240-15-T-0125.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_IV_-_Wage_Determination.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_II_-_ELIN_Structure.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Technical_Exhibit_Attachments.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_I_-_PWS_final.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
NSW 11M RIB Engine IDIQ GULF COAST 1.0
PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a Government developed and applied document used to make sure that systematic quality assurance methods are used in the administration of the Performance Based Service Contract (PBSC) standards included in this contract. The intent is to ensure that the Contractor performs in accordance with performance metrics set forth in the contract documents, that the Government receives the quality of services called for in the contract and that the Government only pays for the acceptable level of services received.
2.0
AUTHORITY
Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under FAR 52.212-4(a), Inspection/Acceptance, which provides for inspections and acceptance of the articles, services, and documentation called for in the contract to be accomplished by the Contracting Officer or his duly authorized representative.
3.0
SCOPE
The Contractor, and not the Government, is responsible for management and quality control actions necessary to meet the quality standards set forth by the contract. The Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is put in place to provide Government surveillance oversight of the Contractor’s quality control efforts to assure that they are timely, effective and are delivering the results specified in the contract. The QASP is not a part of the contract nor is it intended to duplicate the Contractor’s Management Plan. The Government may provide the Contractor an information copy of the QASP as an Attachment to the solicitation to support the Contractor’s efforts in developing its plan for maintaining the levels of quality anticipated to be delivered under the terms of the contract.
4.0
GOVERNMENT RESOURCES
Contracting Officer – The Contracting Officer ensures performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensures compliance with the terms of the contract and safeguards the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. It is the Contracting Officer that assures the Contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under the contract. The Contracting Officer is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance.
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - An individual designated in writing by the Contracting Officer to act as his authorized representative to assist in administering a contract. The source and authority for a COR is the Contracting Officer. COR limitations are contained in the written letter of appointment.
5.0
METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
The below listed methods of surveillance shall be used in the administration of this QASP. The Performance-Based Matrix describes the methods of surveillance that may be used to monitor the services and deliverables to be provided under the contract.
Random Monitoring – Random telephone monitoring shall be conducted if and when deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the terms of the contract. The COR will conduct the random monitoring.
Random Checks/Inspections on Completion of Workload Taskings – Random checks will be conducted to ensure compliance with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP).
6.0
IDENTIFIED QA SURVEILLANCE ITEMS
The PBSC items that have been identified for surveillance are identified in the Performance-Based Matrix.
7.0
DOCUMENTATION
The COR shall maintain a complete Quality Assurance file. The file will contain copies of all reports, evaluations, recommendations, and any actions related to the Government’s performance of the quality assurance function. All such records will be retained for the life of this contract. The COR shall forward these records to the Contracting Officer by request, or at termination or completion of the contract.
8.0
ANALYSIS OF CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE
The analysis of contractor performance shall be conducted at the end of each month and serves to provide a summary of the Contractor’s performance to the Contracting Officer and the Contractor. Overall performance is important in determining whether to increase, decrease or maintain the current level of surveillance and/or whether to initiate corrective action to bring the Contractor’s work up to the standards of the specification.
9.0 Performance Standards
a.
Schedule - The due dates for deliverables and the actual accomplishment of the schedule will be assessed against original due dates established for each task order.
b.
Deliverables – The deliverables required to be submitted will be assessed against the specifications for the deliverables detailed in each task order for the required content, quality, timeliness, and accuracy.
10.0 Performance Measurement
Performance will be measured in accordance with the following table:
| Performance Element |
| Performance Requirement |
| Surveillance Method |
| Frequency |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| Task order Deliverables |
| Task order deliverables furnished as prescribed in the PWS (including Technical Exhibit 2)and Work Packages as applicable |
| Government Representative to Monitor |
| 100% inspection of all task order deliverables. |
| >98% of deliverables submitted timely and without rework required. |
| Overall Task Order Performance |
| Overall task order performance of sufficient quality to earn a Satisfactory (or higher) rating in the COR’s annual report on Contractor Performance |
| Government Representative to Monitor/Review |
| Annual |
| All performance elements rated Satisfactory (or higher) |
Invoicing
| Invoices delivered in a timely fashion. Accuracy of invoices evaluated and no defects allowed. Errors in invoices will be grounds for the Government to return to vendor for re-processing |
| Review & Acceptance of the Invoice |
| Monthly |
| >95% - of invoices submitted timely and |
accurately
| Performance Requirements Summary |
| Adherence to technical exhibit objectives associated with PWS paragraphs 4 and 5. |
| Government Representative Monitor/Review |
| Random inspection of task orders. |
| >95% of inspection without issue. |
12 Incentives/Disincentives
The COR makes an annual report on Contractor Performance (CPARS or other annual report). The contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the task order, reflected in the COR’s annual report, may result in termination of the contract and may also result in the loss of future Government contracts.
For each item that does not meet acceptable levels, the Government may issue a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR). CDRs will be forwarded to the Contracting Officer with a copy sent to the contractor. The contractor must reply in writing within 5 days of receipt identifying how future occurrences of the problem will be prevented. Based upon the contractor’s past performance and plan to solve the problem, the Contracting Officer will determine if any further action will be taken.
In accordance with inspection of services provisions of the task order, the contractor will be incentivized to provide quality products in a timely manner since the Government can require the Contractor, at no additional fee, to replace or correct work that fails to meet task order requirements. To maximize the profit earned on costs incurred, the contractor is incentivized to ensure that quality products are provided in a timely manner.
PAGE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .