2.POTFF PPQ.docx

DOCX document 65 KB Posted

Attached to
USASOC Preservation of the Force Requirement
Solicitation number
H9223923R0004
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
1.Amend 01 23R004 POTFF.pdf PDF
3.POTFF RFP QnA.docx DOCX document
Event Sample Templates.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
H9223923R0004 POTFF Solicitation.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Department of the Army HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY Special Operations COMMAND 2929 desert storm drive FORT Liberty, NC 28310-9110

DATE: June 29, 2023

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) H92239-23-R-0004 Preservation of the Force and Family (POTFF) Family Resiliency

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The United State Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors in the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification Code NAICS 561920 Trade Show Organizers. Relevant past performance may include any experience related to event coordination services by the Contractor.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to Lanora Means at lanora.means@socom.mil and Noel Perez-Quinones at noel.perezquinones@socom.mil, no later than 12 July 2023 @ 1:00PM

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.

Exhibit 1

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

POTFF Family Resiliency H92239-23-R-0004

NOTICE: Once completed, this questionnaire will be considered sensitive and shall NOT be released to the offeror.

Section 1: Contract Identification

1. Contractor’s Name: _________________________________________________________

2. Contract Number (for Past Performance Reference): _______________________________

3. Contractor’s Role in the Contract: Prime ______ Subcontractor______ (check which applies)

4. Cage Code: _____________

5. Contract Type: ____________________

6. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _________ No _________

7. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________

8. Initial Contract Cost: $_________________________

9. Current/Final Contract Cost: $________________________

10. Reason for Cost Difference (if any): $_______________________

11. Description of Services Provided: _____________________________________________

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

1. Customer or Agency Name: __________________________________________________

2. Customer or Agency Description (if applicable): __________________________________

3. Place of Contract Performance: ________________________________________________

Section 3: Evaluator Identification

1. Name: ____________________________________________________________________

2. Title/Role: _________________________________________________________________

3. Contact Information: Email: ____________________________Phone: _________________

4. Amount of time evaluator worked on Subject contract: _______________(years/month/days) Section 4: Evaluation

Please indicate your satisfaction level with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided below.

Code Reference Guide:

E:Exceptional- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V:Very Good- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective
S:Satisfactory- Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M:Marginal- Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U:Unsatisfactory- Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
NA:Not Applicable- Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.
Program Management
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Effectiveness of overall contract management (ability to lead, manage, and control the program)

Implementation of cost saving measures

Timely and effective contract performance/conformance problem resolution

Quality Control standards and methods

Technical Performance
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Compliance with applicable local and federal policies, laws, and regulations

Conformance to Performance Work Statement (PWS) methodologies and techniques

Ability to host multiple training events simultaneously and multiple geographic locations

Employee Retention/ Attraction
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Ability to hire/retain a highly qualified workforce

Maintained qualifications, and certifications, of Contractor personnel

Additional Information:

1. If you indicated a rating of M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) for any of the above sections, please give a brief explanation of why: _____________________________________________

2. Government Contracts Only:

Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default? Yes ___ No ___ Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for convenience? Yes ___ No ___ Are there any pending terminations? Yes ___ No ___ If you answered yes to any of the above, please explain: ________________________________

Section 5: Narrative Summary

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor, or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs, in the future? Yes _____ No ______

Please provide any additional comments that you have concerning the Contractor’s performance in the space provided: ___________________________________________________________

Evaluator Signature Date image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .