2.POTFF PPQ.docx
DOCX document 65 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USASOC Preservation of the Force Requirement
- Solicitation number
- H9223923R0004
- Issued by
-
United States Special Operations Command
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1.Amend 01 23R004 POTFF.pdf | ||
| 3.POTFF RFP QnA.docx | DOCX document | |
| Event Sample Templates.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| H9223923R0004 POTFF Solicitation.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department of the Army HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY Special Operations COMMAND 2929 desert storm drive FORT Liberty, NC 28310-9110
DATE: June 29, 2023
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) H92239-23-R-0004 Preservation of the Force and Family (POTFF) Family Resiliency
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The United State Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors in the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification Code NAICS 561920 Trade Show Organizers. Relevant past performance may include any experience related to event coordination services by the Contractor.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to Lanora Means at lanora.means@socom.mil and Noel Perez-Quinones at noel.perezquinones@socom.mil, no later than 12 July 2023 @ 1:00PM
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Exhibit 1
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
POTFF Family Resiliency H92239-23-R-0004
NOTICE: Once completed, this questionnaire will be considered sensitive and shall NOT be released to the offeror.
Section 1: Contract Identification
1. Contractor’s Name: _________________________________________________________
2. Contract Number (for Past Performance Reference): _______________________________
3. Contractor’s Role in the Contract: Prime ______ Subcontractor______ (check which applies)
4. Cage Code: _____________
5. Contract Type: ____________________
6. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _________ No _________
7. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________
8. Initial Contract Cost: $_________________________
9. Current/Final Contract Cost: $________________________
10. Reason for Cost Difference (if any): $_______________________
11. Description of Services Provided: _____________________________________________
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
1. Customer or Agency Name: __________________________________________________
2. Customer or Agency Description (if applicable): __________________________________
3. Place of Contract Performance: ________________________________________________
Section 3: Evaluator Identification
1. Name: ____________________________________________________________________
2. Title/Role: _________________________________________________________________
3. Contact Information: Email: ____________________________Phone: _________________
4. Amount of time evaluator worked on Subject contract: _______________(years/month/days) Section 4: Evaluation
Please indicate your satisfaction level with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided below.
Code Reference Guide:
| E: | Exceptional- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| V: | Very Good- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective |
| S: | Satisfactory- Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| M: | Marginal- Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| U: | Unsatisfactory- Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| NA: | Not Applicable- Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area. |
| Program Management |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Effectiveness of overall contract management (ability to lead, manage, and control the program)
Implementation of cost saving measures
Timely and effective contract performance/conformance problem resolution
Quality Control standards and methods
| Technical Performance |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Compliance with applicable local and federal policies, laws, and regulations
Conformance to Performance Work Statement (PWS) methodologies and techniques
Ability to host multiple training events simultaneously and multiple geographic locations
| Employee Retention/ Attraction |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Ability to hire/retain a highly qualified workforce
Maintained qualifications, and certifications, of Contractor personnel
Additional Information:
1. If you indicated a rating of M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) for any of the above sections, please give a brief explanation of why: _____________________________________________
2. Government Contracts Only:
Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default? Yes ___ No ___ Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for convenience? Yes ___ No ___ Are there any pending terminations? Yes ___ No ___ If you answered yes to any of the above, please explain: ________________________________
Section 5: Narrative Summary
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor, or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs, in the future? Yes _____ No ______
Please provide any additional comments that you have concerning the Contractor’s performance in the space provided: ___________________________________________________________
Evaluator Signature Date image1.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .