ATTACHMENT 2-KEY PERSONNEL Past Performance Form- GS11P14MKC0066.pdf

PDF 65 KB Posted

Attached to
Construction Renovation of Buildings 3 & 4 at Potomac Annex Compex (POTAX) for the Department of State
Solicitation number
GS-11P-14-MK-C-0066
Issued by

About this file

ATTACHMENT 2-KEY PERSONNEL Past Performance Form- GS11P14MKC0066.pdf

View the file

Other files

Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2: KEY PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.

Please complete this Questionnaire and mail or send by email [ching.hung@gsa.gov] to:

Ching Hung, Contracting Specialist, GSA, NCR 301 7th Street, SW; Room 2021 Washington, DC 20407

Response Date:

MARCH 13, 2015 by 2:00PM EST *Late submissions will not be accepted.

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY GC CONTRACTOR OFFEROR FOR POTOMAC ANNEX RENOVATION OF BUILDINGS 3&4

1. KEY PERSONNEL’S NAME, COMPANY & GC NAME: 4. CONTRACT NO.:

5. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

6. COMPLETION DATE:

2. OWNER’S NAME AND ADDRESS:

7. CONTRACT VALUE: $

8. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

4. PROJECT NAME:

9. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

10. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION (Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:

b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. TIME FOR WHICH PERFORMANCE WAS MONITORED

BY EVALUATOR (MM/YY-MM/YY):

Please circle the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this Individual.

EX = Exceptional VG = Very Good S = Satisfactory MG = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed

A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the Individual’s performance in assuring conformance to contract requirements.

EX VG S MG US N/O

B. Overall Performance – Assess the Individual’s overall performance on the project.

EX VG S MG US N/O

C. Initiative – Assess the Individual’s use of initiative to avoid problems and to respond to problems.

EX VG S MG US N/O

D. Technical Requirements – Assess the Individual’s knowledge and ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.

EX VG S MG US N/O

E. Cost Control – Assess the Individual’s ability and willingness to manage the contract budget and control costs.

EX VG S MG US N/O

F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the Individual’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.

EX VG S MG US N/O

G. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the Individual’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED difficulties.

EX VG S MG US N/O

H. Repeat Business – Assess the likelihood you would be willing to have this Individual work on another of your projects in the future.

EX VG S MG US N/O

ATTACHMENT 2- Solicitation No. GS-11P-14-MK-C-0066 PAGE 1 OF 3

ChingMHung Text Box March 16, 2015 by 2:00PM LOCAL EST.

1. How long was this individual involved with this project?

2. What were his/her duties on this project?

3. Describe how this person met the milestones and if they were proactive in the management of the project, their responsiveness.

4. Describe the technical knowledge of this person during performance of this contract. (ADP skills, architectural/engineering problem solving, presenting information, etc.)

5. Describe the person’s proficiency in business controls (contracting, operations, accounting, and quality).

6. Describe the degree of difficulty or complicated aspects of the project (i.e. secure working areas, publicity and media coverage, etc.) and the person’s performance with difficult and complicated aspects of the project.

ATTACHMENT 2- Solicitation No. GS-11P-14-MK-C-0066 PAGE 2 OF 3

7. Were there any notable problems with this person’s performance, such as construction related matters that they could not resolve, how did they do at problem solving etc?

8. Describe why you would or would not contract with this person again for the same services.

ATTACHMENT 2- Solicitation No. GS-11P-14-MK-C-0066 PAGE 3 OF 3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .