Amendment_002.pdf

1st Floor Courtroom and Chambers Renovation PBS-REG- 5 Joseph P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse, Columbus, Ohio GS-05P-13-FB-C-0002

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

Amendment #002 is issued to make the following changes:

1.) The attached Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey is included.

2.) The attached Questions and Answers are incorporated.

All other solicitation terms and conditions not specifically addressed remain unchanged.

Question & Answer (Amendment 002)

QUESTION 1:

Based on your response to two contractors at the Pre-Proposal Conference regarding the use of a non-specified Architectural Wood Casework Manufacturer in their proposal, I believe that there may be confusion and therefore clarification is requested.

1. Your response to the first contractor indicated that the name of an alternative Architectural Casework manufacturer had to be submitted to you by this Friday, 11/9/2012. If approved, that manufacturer's name would be published in the Pre- Proposal addendum for the information of all bidding General Contractors.

2. Your response to the second contractor, if I recall correctly, indicated that the General Contractor could use the history of the Architectural Casework manufacturer in performing the type of work required on the project, as opposed to the General Contractor relying on his history in similar complex projects.

It is possible that the intent of the second contractor was to find out if a non-preapproved manufacturer could be used with the General Contractor's proposal and have the proposal still considered.

ANSWER

There are two distinct requirements.

The relevant specification sections (eg., 06 4100, 06 4216, etc.) of the solicitation specify three manufacturers, one of whose products must be used. Substitutions are permitted, but must be approved by the Contracting Officer in his sole discretion. To have a substitute firm approved in advance of the due date for proposals, substitution requests must be received by 5 PM (Central Time) on Tuesday, November 13, 2012, and such requests must include at a minimum the name of the firm, the link to its web site, its qualifications, a list of projects completed in the past five years with at least three similar projects highlighted, photos of those similar projects, and the names and contact information of references for those similar projects. This information must be submitted via email to the Contracting Officer (neal.deodhar@gsa.gov). Approval is in the Contracting Officer’s sole discretion, and submission of the above listed information does not guarantee approval. The solicitation will be amended to include any additional approved firms. Only approved firms may be used on this project.

The technical proposal includes a requirement for past performance references for millwork installation. The installer is not specified in the RFP. The installer may be the GC, or a subcontractor( including the same firm that will be fabricating the millwork).

Regardless of the identity of the firm that will be performing the millwork installation, the appropriate past performance reference forms (Millwork Installation) for projects completed by that firm must be received by the Contracting Officer on or before the due date for receipt of proposals. With regard to past performance, a complete technical proposal should include at least three past performance references for similar work, and at least two past performance references for millwork installation.

QUESTION 2

When is the deadline to submit the "Qualification Submittal" for Architectural Woodworking?

ANSWER

See response to Question 1.

U.S. General Services Administration Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Survey

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

GSA Building No.: OH-0046 GSA Location 7

Prepared By:

Versar, Inc.

100 West 22nd Street, Suite 151 Lombard, IL 60148

January 31, 2006

Versar Project Number: 104700.4972.130 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY PROTOCOL

3.1 Asbestos Information

3.2 Asbestos Survey

3.3 Asbestos Analysis

3.4 Asbestos Survey Results

4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY PROTOCOL

4.1 Lead Paint Survey

4.2 Lead Paint Analysis

4.3 Lead Paint Survey Results

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.0 STUDY LIMITATIONS

Tables

Table 1 Asbestos Survey Analytical Summary

Table 2 Asbestos Inventory and Management Assessment

Table 3 Lead-Based Paint Survey Summary

Attachments

Attachment A Facility Maps: Location of ACM/Location of LBP

Attachment B Asbestos and Lead Analytical Reports

Attachment C Photographs

Attachment D Field Notes and Drawings

Attachment E Cost Estimates

Attachment F Terminology

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Versar has completed an asbestos-containing material (ACM) and lead-based paint (LBP) survey of the J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse (subject building), 85 Marconi Boulevard, Columbus, Ohio.

The facility was inspected by State of Ohio Department of Health Licensed Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist, and Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Licensed Asbestos and Lead Inspector and Asbestos Management Planner, Ms. Shaun Terranova (#ES34257, #100- 03064, #L-002600, respectively), and IDPH Licensed Asbestos and Lead Inspector Mr. Curtis Cannon (#100-03976, #L-001190), on October 6, 2005. The survey was conducted in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) General Industry Standard (29CFR1910.1001), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standard for Asbestos (40 CFR Part 61), applicable local and state requirements, and in conformance with the scope and limitations of U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) specifications.

The asbestos survey included identification of friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) on an area-by-area basis, assessment of friability, current condition and potential for future disturbance of the material, estimate of the amount of ACBM, and overall condition rating of the material. Versar has incorporated into this report data from a previous inspection report conducted by ENSR International (ENSR) dated April 2004 entitled, “Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint Survey, J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse” (document number 09090-053- 700). During the April 2004 inspection, ENSR identified 50 separate asbestos homogenous sampling areas (HSAs) and collected a total of 137 samples of suspect ACMs. ENSR’s samples were analyzed by AMA Analytical Services, Inc. (AMA) of Lanham, Maryland.

During Versar’s October 6, 2005 inspection, Versar identified an additional six HSA’s and collected 14 samples of these suspect ACMs. Versar’s samples were analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) in Chicago, Illinois. Some materials were not sampled during Versar’s or ENSR’s survey and are assumed to be ACMs until sampling proves otherwise. HSAs V-02, V- 04, E-48, E-49 and E-50 were not sampled during the surveys since sampling would have caused damage to these materials. The following materials were found to be asbestos-containing or assumed to be ACMs:

HSA ID Material Description Location Quantity Asbestos %

V-02 Main Roof - High Roof (Roof, Caulk) Throughout Main Roof 48,000 sf Assumed Positive

V-04 Lower Roof (Roof, Caulk) Throughout Lower Roof 25,000 sf Assumed Positive

E-1 12"x12" Floor Tile, Off White with Brown Specks Basement Room 030 700 sf 2% Chrysotile

E-5 Boiler Breaching Insulation Boiler Room 500 sf 30% Chrysotile

E-7 Domestic Pipe Insulation-Wool Felt Basement Break Room 15,000 sf 30% Chrysotile

E-10 Mastic Associated With 9"x9" Floor Tile, Black with White Streaks Basement Shop 5,260 sf 3% Chrysotile

(mastic)

E-11 Mastic Associated With 9"x9" Floor Tile, Maroon Basement Room 020 2,500 sf 3% Chrysotile

(mastic)

E-14 Steam Line Insulation-Mag Block Basement 10,000 lf 27% Chrysotile 3% Amosite

E-18 9"x9" Floor Tile, Beige Basement 1,000 sf 2% Chrysotile (tile)

E-19 Mastic Associated With 9"x9" Floor Tile, Black with white & green streaks Basement 180 sf 2% Chrysotile

(mastic)

E-20 Duct Insulation on Small Duct Basement Janitors Closet & Break Room

60 sf 20% Chrysotile

E-22 Duct Insulation on Abandoned Duct Work Basement Archives 300 sf 25% Chrysotile

E-23 Air Handler Insulation-Corners On Fiberglass

Basement South & Mezzanine 24,000 sf 30% Chrysotile

E-27 Transite Wall Board Basement – Garage Shop 250 sf 10% Chrysotile

E-28 Mastic Associated With 12"x12" Floor Tile, Tan with Brown Streaks

Basement Custodial Office 2,500 sf 2% Chrysotile

(mastic)

E-32 Mastic Associated With 12"x12" Floor Tile, Beige Marbled Pattern 1st & 2nd Floor 300 sf 2% Chrysotile

(mastic)

E-37 Duct Insulation , 4th Floor -Hard / Gray 4th Floor Storage 200 sf 28% Chrysotile 2% Crocidolite

E-44 Aircell Board on Radiator Boxes - 3rd Floor 3rd Floor Corridor 400 sf 30% Chrysotile

E-48 Acoustical Wall Panels - 3rd Floor Courtrooms 3rd Floor Courtrooms 30,000 Assumed Positive

E-49 Fire Doors - Basement Basement 200 doors Assumed Positive E-50 Rolled Roofing - Garage Garage 14,000 sf Assumed Positive

The lead-based paint (LBP) survey included collection of paint chip samples to provide consistent coverage based on building size, layout, and renovation/abatement history. The number and frequency of samples collected are a representation of the number of different paint colors in each building functional space (i.e., mechanical areas, office space, common areas), and total square footage of painted surfaces within that particular functional space. It should be noted that this LBP survey is not intended to be comprehensive in nature; rather is an attempt to evaluate the lead content of the predominant paint types within the building based on Versar’s observations.

Versar incorporated data from ENSR’s April 2004 report as part of the LBP survey. ENSR collected three samples of suspect LBP and Versar collected an additional four samples. Based upon lead-based paint analytical results, LBP was identified in five of the seven samples collected during the two inspections. Lead-based paint is defined by the EPA as a paint that contains lead in concentrations that are equal to or in excess of 0.5 % by weight, or 5,000 parts per million (ppm).

The following sections give detailed descriptions of the building, survey methodologies, analytical testing, and conclusions. The tables and attachments provide support information.

2.0 INTRODUCTION

On behalf of the General Services Administration (GSA), Versar, Inc. (Versar) conducted a survey for suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint (LBP) at J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse, 85 Marconi Boulevard, Columbus, Ohio. The subject building has five floors, basement, two roof levels (upper and lower), and comprises approximately 270,909 total square feet.

Work was conducted in accordance with Versar’s proposal to GSA dated May 17, 2005 (in response to GSA RFQ 80755) and GSA Contract (GS05P05GAA0169). The inspection was conducted on October 6, 2005. The objective of the asbestos survey was to conduct an AHERA-type building inspection for ACMs and prepare an Asbestos Management Plan to fulfill asbestos requirements as specified in 29 CFR Part 1910.1001 (OSHA Asbestos General Industry Standard).

The lead-based paint survey included collect of paint chip samples to provide consistent coverage based on building size, layout, and renovation/abatement history. It should be noted that this LBP survey is not intended to be comprehensive in nature; rather is an attempt to evaluate the lead content of the predominant paint types within the building based on Versar’s observations.

Versar’s State of Ohio Department of Health Licensed Asbestos Hazard Evaluation Specialist, and Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Licensed Asbestos and Lead Inspector and Asbestos Management Planner, Ms. Shaun Terranova (#ES34257, #100-03064, #L-002600, respectively), and IDPH Licensed Asbestos and Lead Inspector Mr. Curtis Cannon (#100-03976, #L-001190) performed the inspection and collected bulk samples of interior friable and non-friable suspect ACM and LBP. Versar was escorted by GSA Project Manager, Mr. Philip Ramos. The ACM survey included a limited inspection of the facility to determine the amount, condition, and general location of suspect ACM within the facility and collection of bulk samples for laboratory analysis.

Suspect asbestos bulk samples were analyzed using the Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) method of analysis and paint chip samples were analyzed utilizing Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) by EPA Method 6010. Versar’s samples were analyzed by trained microscopists at EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) in Chicago, Illinois.

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY PROTOCOL

3.1 Asbestos Information

Asbestos is the generic term used to describe a group of naturally occurring silicate minerals that have the ability to separate into small, fine fibers. The most widely used types of asbestos are chrysotile and amosite. Other types include crocidolite, tremolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite.

Exposure to these fibers has been linked to a number of health problems, including asbestosis, mesothelioma, and lung cancer.

Federal regulatory agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have targeted friable asbestos as the primary source for release of and subsequent exposure to asbestos fibers. The U.S. EPA regulations define AACMs@ as materials containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos. ACMs are regulated under the U.S. EPA National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Standard for Demolition and Renovation and OSHA regulations.

A list of asbestos terms and their definitions are located in Attachment F. These are intended to provide the reader with a better understanding of the terminology used in the report.

3.2 Asbestos Survey

The ACM survey included an inspection for friable and non-friable suspect ACMs identified throughout the subject property. Friable materials (such as thermal system insulation or TSI), are those which when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure, thereby releasing airborne fibers. Non-friable materials (such as vinyl floor tile) are those typically bound within a matrix, which do not readily release airborne fibers.

Versar inspectors met with building representatives and assigned Homogeneous Sampling Areas (HSAs) based on type of material, category, and appearance. The inventory of suspect materials identified during the ACM survey includes location of each suspect ACM HSA, description of the material, quantity, and material’s friability, condition, and accessibility (Table 1 - Asbestos Survey and Analytical Summary).

Suspect ACM identified by Versar as part of this survey included:

• Floor Tile and Mastic

• Plaster

• Drywall Systems

• Ceiling Tile

• Roofing Materials

• Fire Doors

• Acoustical Wall Panels

• HVAC Vibration Cloth

• Aircell Board on Radiator Boxes

• Caulk

• AHU Insulation

• Boiler Breeching

• Pipe and Fitting Insulation

• Duct Insulation

• Transite Wall Board

• Linoleum Flooring

• Ceiling Tile Mastic

• Cementitious Flooring

In accordance with the GSA scope-of-work, roofing materials were not sampled, but were assumed to contain asbestos and therefore, were quantified and included in the report inventory.

The ACM survey did not include identification or sampling of building materials that are unlikely to contain asbestos or materials that appeared to be non-asbestos in nature (e.g., fiberglass, concrete, ceramic, and wood products).

Versar inspectors walked through all accessible areas of the subject building, inventoried materials and quantities, wrote narrative descriptions, and drew sketches of the locations of each suspect ACM. Versar collected the required number of samples and photographed each HSA. Photographs are included in Table 1 and Attachment C.

Versar has incorporated into this report data from a previous inspection report conducted by ENSR International (ENSR) dated April 2004 entitled, “Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint Survey, J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse” (document number 09090-053-700). During the April 2004 inspection ENSR identified 50 separate asbestos homogenous sampling areas (HSA’s) and collected a total of 137 samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). ENSR’s samples were analyzed by AMA Analytical Services, Inc. (AMA) of Lanham, Maryland.

During Versar’s October 6, 2005 inspection, six additional HSA’s were identified and 14 samples of suspect ACMs were collected. Versar’s samples were analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc.

(EMSL) in Chicago, Illinois. Some materials were not sampled at the time of the surveys and are assumed to be ACMs until sampling proves otherwise (Table 1 - Asbestos Survey and Analytical Summary).

Versar exercised care in selecting the locations from which the samples were collected. Areas sampled were pre-wetted with an amended water solution to minimize the release of airborne fibers during sample collection. Each sample was immediately placed in a Ziploc® bag to reduce the possibility of fiber release and cross-contamination during sample handling and shipment.

Collected samples were documented in the chain-of-custody and relinquished to the asbestos laboratory by the inspector.

3.3 Asbestos Analysis

Vesar’s bulk samples were submitted for analysis to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) in Chicago, Illinois and ENSR’s samples were analyzed by AMA Analytical Services, Inc. (AMA) of Lanham, Maryland. EMSL and AMA are American Industrial Hygiene Association-accredited laboratories that successfully participates in the National Institute of Standards & Technology's (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for asbestos bulk sample analysis.

Versar collected a minimum of three bulk samples of each suspect homogenous material identified.

Bulk samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining and quantified in accordance with the Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (U.S. EPA Method 600/R-93/116).

3.4 Asbestos Survey Results

This section presents a summary of the analytical results of samples collected during the asbestos survey. Refer to Table 2 - Asbestos Inventory and Management Assessment for further descriptions of the materials sampled, general locations of sampled materials, approximate quantity of the materials in the facility, analytical results of the bulk samples, and management assessment.

The U.S. EPA considers a building material to be an ACM if the material is found to contain greater than one percent (1%) asbestos. If one sample in a homogenous sampling area is determined to be positive for asbestos, the entire homogenous sampling area is considered to be

ACM.

Asbestos was identified in quantities greater than 1% in the following materials:

• 12"x12" Floor Tile, Off White with Brown Specks

• Boiler Breaching Insulation

• Domestic Pipe Insulation-Wool Felt

• Mastic Associated With 9"x9" Floor Tile, Black with White Streaks

• Mastic Associated With 9"x9" Floor Tile, Maroon

• Steam Line Insulation-Mag Block

• 9"x9" Floor Tile, Beige

• Mastic Associated With 9"x9" Floor Tile, Black with white & green streaks

• Duct Insulation on Small Duct

• Duct Insulation on Abandoned Duct Work

• Air Handler Insulation-Corners On Fiberglass

• Transite Wall Board

• Mastic Associated With 12"x12" Floor Tile, Tan with Brown Streaks

• Mastic Associated With 12"x12" Floor Tile, Beige Marbled Pattern

• Duct Insulation , 4th Floor -Hard / Gray

• Aircell Board on Radiator Boxes - 3rd Floor

The following materials were not sampled during the surveys and are assumed to be ACM, until sampling proves otherwise. These materials (HSA’s V-02, V-04, E-48, E-49 and E-50) were not sampled during the surveys since sampling would have caused damage to these materials:

• Fire Doors

• Roofing Materials

• Acoustical Wall Panels

The condition of ACM observed at the time the survey is listed in Table 2. Any materials encountered during the survey that could not be accessed, that are assumed ACM, or that would have required destructive sampling, were not sampled. These materials include, but were not limited to the material listed above.

The analytical laboratory reports prepared by EMSL and AMA for the analysis of bulk asbestos samples can be found in Attachment B. Facility maps, which show the locations of samples collected and areas where ACMs were identified, are included as Attachment A. Photographs of each HSA are provided in Attachment C. Field notes and drawings are provided in Attachment D.

Cost estimates for asbestos abatement are provided in Attachment E.

4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY PROTOCOL

4.1 Lead Paint Survey

A lead-based paint (LBP) survey was performed by Versar at the J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse, 85 Marconi Boulevard, Columbus, Ohio. Versar representatives, Mr. Curt Cannon and Ms. Shaun Terranova, performed the inspection on October 6, 2005. Mr. Cannon and Ms. Terranova are IDPH licensed Lead Inspectors/Risk Assessors. Versar incorporated data from the ENSR April 2004 report as part of the LBP survey. ENSR collected three samples of suspect LBP and Versar collected an additional four samples utilizing the paint chip sampling methodology described below (See Table 3 – Lead Paint Survey Summary).

Locations of suspect LBP from the interior of the building included the following:

• Walls

• Floors

• Windows/Roof Components

• Grills-Window

Locations of paint chip samples collected were focused to provide consistent coverage based on building size, layout, and renovation/abatement history. The number and frequency of samples collected are a representation of the number of different paint colors in each building functional space (i.e., mechanical areas, office space, common areas) and total square footage of painted surfaces within that particular functional space. It should be noted that this LBP survey is not intended to be comprehensive in nature; rather is an attempt to evaluate the lead content of the predominant paint types within the building based on Versar’s observations.

4.2 Lead Paint Analysis

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines LBP as any paint, varnish, shellac or other coating that contains lead in concentrations that are equal to or in excess of 0.5 % by weight or 5,000 parts per million (ppm). OSHA recognizes LBP as paint that contains any detectable amount of lead. Under OSHA, paints containing lead in concentrations less than the trigger level are subject to regulation under the OSHA Lead Exposure in Construction; Interim Final Rule (29 CFR 1926.62). Lead-based paints are still commonly used in many commercial applications. Paint chip samples were analyzed by EMSL utilizing Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) by EPA Method 6010.

4.3 Lead Paint Survey Results

Based upon lead-based paint analytical results, LBP was identified in five samples collected during the two inspections. Lead-based paint is defined by the EPA as a paint that contains lead in concentrations that are equal to or in excess of 0.5 % by weight or 5,000 parts per million (ppm).

Table 3 – Lead Paint Survey Summary, includes LBP paint descriptions, sample identification numbers and locations, and paint conditions. The analytical laboratory report prepared by EMSL for the analysis of paint chip samples can be found in Attachment B. Facility maps, which show the locations of LBP, are included as Attachment A. Cost estimates for mitigation are provided in Attachment E.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Versar recommends the following:

● Prior to renovation or demolition of a building, all regulated friable ACM must be removed from the affected area. In addition, non-friable materials which are in a damaged condition or likely to become friable during renovation or demolition activities also require removal. Non-friable materials, which are in good condition at the time of inspection and most likely will not become friable during demolition/renovation may under certain circumstances, remain in place prior to demolition/renovation. Prior to future renovations and/or demolition activities at the subject property, additional building investigations should be conducted in order to ascertain quantities and verify that conditions have not changed since the most recent inspection.

• Employees, tenants, contractors, and vendors working in the building should be notified of the presence, quantity, and location of identified or assumed ACM.

• All friable ACM, damaged non-friable ACM, and all non-friable ACM which may become friable during renovation or demolition, should be removed from the affected areas of the building prior to these activities.

• Areas of the building not identified in this investigation report (inaccessible areas, pipe chases, etc.) should be inspected and sampled for asbestos prior to any renovation, demolition, or disturbance of potential ACM.

• The owner should develop and/or maintain an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for

ACM remaining in the facility.

EPA’s NESHAP (40 CFR Part 61) requires building owners to inspect for ACM in areas of a building where renovation or demolition will take place. These materials should be removed by specially trained and equipped workers before demolition/renovation work begins following applicable regulations. Although a licensed asbestos abatement contractor is not required for the removal of Category I non-friable materials (provided they remain intact, non-friable, and in good condition), contractors working with these materials must comply with the OSHA Asbestos Standard for the construction industry which has specific training requirements and work practices for construction or maintenance involving the removal of any ACM.

Prior to renovation or demolition of a building, all regulated friable ACM must be removed from the affected area. In addition, non-friable materials, which are in a damaged condition or are likely to become friable during the process of renovation or demolition also, require removal. Non-friable materials, which are in good condition at the time of inspection and most likely will not become friable during demolition may under certain circumstances, remain in place prior to demolition.

Under current federal regulations, lead-based paint that is intact does not need to be removed prior to demolition, however, the contractor performing the demolition is required to comply with the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard (29 CFR 1926.62). In the early 1990s, Title X redefined the concept of “lead-based paint hazards.” Title X states that a lead-based paint hazard is “any condition that causes exposure to lead from lead-contaminated dust; bare, lead-contaminated soil;

or lead-based paint that is deteriorated or intact lead-based paint present on accessible surfaces that would result in adverse human health effects.” Thus, under this definition, intact lead-based paint on most walls and ceilings is not considered a “hazard”, although the condition of the paint should be monitored and maintained to ensure that it does not become deteriorated.

Demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing lead are present is one section of OSHA Regulation (1926.62 (a)(1)). OSHA requires employers to conduct personal air monitoring during construction work where painted surfaces that contain detectable amounts of lead are impacted. OSHA defines construction work as work for the purposes of construction, alteration and/or repair (including repainting and decorating). The purpose of the exposure monitoring is to ensure that employees are not exposed to lead at concentrations that exceed the permissible exposure level (PEL) of fifty micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (50 mg/m3) or the action level (AL) of thirty micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air (30 mg/m3) over an 8-hour period. Should the exposure exceed the AL or PEL over an 8-hour time period, the employer will be required to provide the employee with some or all of the following: appropriate respiratory protection, personal protective clothing, change areas, hand washing facilities, biological monitoring (blood sampling and analysis), and the proper training.

6.0 STUDY LIMITATIONS

The data presented and the opinions expressed in this report are qualified as follows:

• Versar derived the data in this report primarily from visual asbestos inspections, field sampling, examination of the previous inspection report conducted by ENSR International (ENSR) dated April 2004 entitled, “Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint Survey, J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse”, and other documentation, interviews with individuals with information about the subject site, and information provided by the GSA. The passage of time, manifestation of latent conditions, or occurrence of future events may require further exploration at the property, analysis of the data, and re-evaluation of the findings, observations, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report.

• In preparing this report, Versar has relied upon and assumed accurate certain information from the ENSR asbestos survey report dated April 2004 about the subject site provided by the GSA. Except as otherwise stated in the report, Versar has not attempted to verify the accuracy or completeness of such information.

• The data reported and the findings, observations and conclusions expressed in the report are limited by the Scope of Services. The Scope of Services was defined by the requests of the GSA and the time constraints imposed by the GSA.

• Because of the limitations stated above, the findings, observations, and conclusions expressed by Versar regarding the ENSR asbestos survey report dated April 2004 in this report are limited to the information obtained and should not be considered an opinion concerning the compliance of any past or current owner or operator of the subject site with any federal, state, or local law or regulation. No warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied, is made with respect to the ENSR data reported or findings, observations, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in their report.

• This report was prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of the Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the Agreement and the provisions thereof.

Table 1

Asbestos Survey Analytical Summary

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type Photos

KV-01 Room 11 - Air Handling Unit ND

KV-02 Room 11 - Air Handling Unit ND

KV-03 Room 11 - Air Handling Unit ND Not Sampled Assumed Positive Not Sampled Assumed Positive Not Sampled Assumed Positive

KV-04 Roof Penthouse - West ND KV-05 Roof Penthouse - Est ND KV-06 Roof Tower ND

Not Sampled Assumed Positive Not Sampled Assumed Positive Not Sampled Assumed Positive

KV-07 Penthouse Buildings - West ND KV-08 Penthouse Buildings - East ND KV-09 Penthouse Buildings - West ND KV-10 SE Exterior Vestibule ND KV-11 East Side of Building ND KV-12 South Side of Building ND KV-13 East Side of Building ND KV-14 West Side of Building ND

1-001 Basement Room 030 Tile= 2% Chrysotile, Mastic Negative

1-002 Basement Room 030 N/A No Photo Available 1-003 Basement Room 030 N/A

12"x12" Floor Tile, Off White with Brown SpecksE-1 MM

Throughout Exterior

V-06 MM Caulk on Granite

V-03 MM Caulk on Limestone

Throughout Exterior

Throughout Lower Roof

Throughout Exterior

150 lf

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova Date: October 6, 2005

TSIV-01

Air Handler Insulation - Corners on Fiberglass

Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

2400 lf

MMV-04

V-02

V-03

Main Roof - High Roof (Roof, Caulk)

Caulk on Limestone

Lower Roof (Roof, Caulk) Assumed Positive per GSA

V-05 MM

Window Caulk (penthouse) Roof - Exterior

MM

MM

Assumed Positive per GSA

Entire Building

Throughout Main Roof

700 sf

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type Photos

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova Date: October 6, 2005Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

2-004-A Basement Room 030 Non-ACM 2-004-B Basement Room 030 Non-ACM No Photo Available 2-004-C Basement West Non-ACM 2-005-A Basement SE Non-ACM 2-005-B Basement SE Non-ACM No Photo Available 2-005-C 3rd Floor -Room 335E Non-ACM 2-006-A 2nd Floor- Room 220 Non-ACM

Non-ACM No Photo Available Non-ACM

3-007 Basement Room 030 Non-ACM 3-008 Basement Room 030 Non-ACM No Photo Available 3-009 Basement Room 030 Non-ACM 4-010 Basement Room 030 Non-ACM 4-011 Basement Room 030 Non-ACM No Photo Available 4-012 Basement Room 030 Non-ACM 5-013 Boiler Room 30% Chrysotile 5-014 Boiler Room N/A No Photo Available 5-015 Boiler Room N/A

6-150 2nd Floor- District Office Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

6-151 2nd Floor- District Office N/A No Photo Available 6-152 2nd Floor- District Office N/A 7-019 Basement Break Room 30% Chrysotile 7-020 Basement Break Room N/A No Photo Available 7-021 Basement West N/A 8-022 Basement West Non-ACM 8-023 Basement West Non-ACM No Photo Available 8-024 4th Floor Library Non-ACM

9-153 2nd Floor- District Office Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

9-154 Break Room Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative No Photo Available

9-155 Break Room Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

10-028 Basement Shop Mastic 3% 10-029 Basement Shop N/A No Photo Available 10-030 Basement Shop N/A

MM Drywall

MM Drywall

E-10 MM 9"x9" Floor Tile, Black with White Streaks

E-9 MM 12"x12" Floor Tile, Pink Smeared Pattern

E-8 MM 2'x5' Ceiling Tile 8" Square Pattern

E-7 TSI Domestic Pipe Insulation-Wool Felt

E-6 MM 12"x12" Floor Tile, Gray Smear Pattern

E-5 TSI Boiler Breaching Insulation

E-4 MM 2'X2' Ceiling Tile, Grayish Brown, Framed

E-3 MM 2'X2' Ceiling Tile, Grayish Brown

E-2 MM Drywall

E-2

E-2 -

NQ

NQ

- NQ

- NQ

NQ

NQ

500 sf

15,000 sf

NQ-

- NQ

- 5,260 sf

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type Photos

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova Date: October 6, 2005Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

11-031 Basement Room 020 Tile= Non-ACM Mastic 3%

11-032 Basement Room 020 N/A No Photo Available 11-033 Basement Room 020 N/A 12-034 Basement Corridor Non-ACM 12-035 Basement Corridor Non-ACM No Photo Available 12-036 Basement Corridor Non-ACM

13-147 2nd Floor - Vending Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

13-148 2nd Floor - Vending Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative No Photo Available

13-149 2nd Floor - Vending Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

14-040 Basement West 27% Chrysotile / 3% Amosite

14-041 Basement Mechanical Room N/A No Photo Available 14-042 Basement Mechanical Room N/A

15-043 Basement West Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

15-044 Basement West Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative No Photo Available

15-045 Basement West Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

16-046 Basement Break Room Non-ACM 16-047 Basement Break Room Non-ACM No Photo Available 16-048 Basement Storage Non-ACM 17-049 1st Floor Custodial Non-ACM 17-050 5th Floor Room 506 Non-ACM No Photo Available 17-051 Mezzanine Non-ACM 17-052 3rd Floor Room 333 Non-ACM 17-053 2nd Floor Room 224 Non-ACM No Photo Available 17-054 3rd Floor Room 312A Non-ACM

E-17 SM Ceiling Plaster

E-16

E-17

MM 2'x4' Ceiling Tile, White Fissured

SM Ceiling Plaster

E-15 MM 9"x9" Floor Tile, Green with White Streaks

E-14 TSI Steam Line Insulation-Mag Block

E-13 MM 12"x12" Floor Tile Gray Marbled

E-12 TSI Hard Mud Fittings on Fiberglass Lines

E-11 MM 9"x9" Floor Tile, Maroon - 2,500 sf

- NQ

- NQ

- 10,000 lf

- NQ

- NQ

- NQ

- NQ

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type Photos

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova Date: October 6, 2005Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

17-055 4th Floor Storage Non-ACM Non-ACM No Photo Available Non-ACM

18-056 Basement Building Shop Tile=Trace Chrysotile Mastic= Non-ACM

18-057 Basement East Tile = 2% Chrysotile Mastic= Non-ACM No Photo Available

18-058 Basement East N/A

19-059 Basement West Tile= Non-ACM Mastic 2%

19-060 Basement West Tile= Non-ACM Mastic -N/A No Photo Available

19-061 Basement West Tile= Non-ACM Mastic -N/A

20-062 Basement Janitors Closet and Break Room 20% Chrysotile 20-063 Basement Janitors Closet and Break Room N/A No Photo Available 20-064 Basement Janitors Closet and Break Room N/A 21-065 Basement South Non-ACM 21-066 5th Floor Room 510 Non-ACM No Photo Available 21-067 5th Floor Room 508 Non-ACM 21-068 5th Floor Room 506 Non-ACM 21-069 1st Floor GSA Non-ACM No Photo Available 21-070 4th Floor Corridor Non-ACM 21-071 1st Floor Cafeteria Non-ACM

- - Non-ACM No Photo Available

- - Non-ACM

E-21 SM Wall Plaster

E-21 SM Wall Plaster

E-20 TSI Duct Insulation on Small Duct

E-21 SM Wall Plaster

E-18 MM 9"x9" Floor Tile, Beige

E-19 MM 9"x9" Floor Tile, Black with white & green streaks

E-17 SM Ceiling Plaster - NQ

- 1,000 sf

- 180 sf

- 60 sf

- NQ

- NQ

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type Photos

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova Date: October 6, 2005Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

22-072 Basement Archives 25% Chrysotile 22-073 Basement Archives N/A No Photo Available 22-074 Basement Archives N/A 23-075 Basement South 30% Chrysotile 23-076 Mezzanine N/A No Photo Available 23-077 Mezzanine N/A 24-078 Basement Room 020 Non-ACM 24-079 Basement Room 020 Non-ACM No Photo Available 24-080 Basement South East Non-ACM 25-081 Basement Room 020 Non-ACM 25-082 Basement Room 020 Non-ACM No Photo Available 25-083 Basement Room 020 Non-ACM 26-084 Basement Storage Non-ACM 26-085 Basement South East Non-ACM No Photo Available 26-086 Basement South East Non-ACM 27-087 Basement-Garage Shop 10% Chrysotile 27-088 Basement-Garage Shop N/A No Photo Available 27-089 Basement-Garage Shop N/A

28-090 Basement Custodial Office Tile= Non-ACM Mastic- Trace

28-091 Basement Custodial Office Tile= Non-ACM Mastic 2% No Photo Available

28-092 Basement Custodial Office N/A

29-093 1st Floor Cafeteria Linoleum= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

29-094 1st Floor Cafeteria Linoleum= Non-ACM Mastic Negative No Photo Available

29-095 1st Floor Cafeteria Linoleum= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

E-28 MM 12"x12" Floor Tile, Tan with Brown Streaks

E-29 MM Floor Linoleum, Gray with White Specks

E-26 MM 2'x4' Ceiling Tile, White Fissured/Pinhole (New)

E-27 MM Transite Wall Board

E-24 MM 2'X2' Ceiling Tile, Centimeter Square Grid

E-25 MM 2'x2' Ceiling Tile, Millimeter Square Grid

E-22 TSI Duct Insulation on Abandoned Duct Work

E-23 TSI Air Handler Insulation-Corners On Fiberglass

- 300 sf

- 24,000 sf

- NQ

- NQ

- 250 sf

2,500 sf-

NQ

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type Photos

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova Date: October 6, 2005Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

30-096 Basement West Non-ACM 30-097 1st Floor - Room 132 Non-ACM No Photo Available 30-098 1st Floor - Room 132 Non-ACM

31-099 5th Floor Room 549A Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

31-100 5th Floor Room 549A Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative No Photo Available

31-101 5th Floor Room 549A Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

32-102 2nd Floor Room 224 Tile= Non-ACM Mastic 2%

32-103 1st Floor - Room 123 Tile= Non-ACM Mastic-N/A No Photo Available

32-104 1st Floor - Room 123 Tile= Non-ACM Mastic- N/A

33-105 Basement Storage Non-ACM 33-106 1st Floor Room 108 Non-ACM No Photo Available 33-107 1st Floor Room 108 Non-ACM 34-108 Basement Storage Non-ACM 34-109 1st Floor North East Conference Room Non-ACM No Photo Available 34-110 1st Floor Room 167 Non-ACM

35-111 1st Floor North Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

35-112 1st Floor North Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative No Photo Available

35-113 1st Floor North Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

E-34 MM 1'x1' Spline Ceiling Tile

E-35 MM 12"x12" Floor Tile Light Green with White Specks

E-32 MM 12"x12" Floor Tile, Beige Marbled Pattern

E-33 MM 2'X2' Ceiling Tile, White textured & Stepped

E-30 MM 2'x4' Ceiling Tile -2'x2' Pattern

E-31 MM 12"x12" Floor Tile, White with Black Border

- NQ

- NQ

- 300 sf

- NQ

- NQ

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type Photos

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova Date: October 6, 2005Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

36-114 5th Floor Room 550 Linoleum = Non-ACM Mastic Negative

36-115 5th Floor Room 550 Linoleum = Non-ACM Mastic Negative No Photo Available

36-116 5th Floor Room 550 Linoleum = Non-ACM Mastic Negative

37-117 4th Floor Storage 28% Chrysotile 2% Crocidolite

37-118 4th Floor Storage N/A No Photo Available 37-119 4th Floor Storage N/A 38-120 4th Floor Above Ceiling Non-ACM 38-121 4th Floor Above Ceiling Non-ACM No Photo Available 38-122 4th Floor Above Ceiling Non-ACM 39-123 5th Floor Room 506 Non-ACM 39-124 5th Floor Room 506 Non-ACM No Photo Available 39-125 5th Floor Room 506 Non-ACM

40-126 5th Floor Room 549A Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

40-127 5th Floor Room 549A Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative No Photo Available

40-128 5th Floor Room 549A Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

41-129 5th Floor Room 506 Non-ACM 41-130 5th Floor Room 506 Non-ACM No Photo Available 41-131 5th Floor Room 506 Non-ACM

E-40 MM 12"x12" Floor Tile- Cream & Black & White -Courtroom

E-41 MM Black Cementitious Flooring

E-38 MM Duct Insulation, Brown Fibrous Above Fourth Floor

E-39 MM 1'x1' Ceiling Tile & Mastic

E-36 MM Battleship Linoleum, Olive with Black Border

E-37 MM Duct Insulation , 4th Floor -Hard / Gray

- NQ

- 200 sf

- NQ

NQ-

- NQ

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type Photos

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova Date: October 6, 2005Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

42-132 Penthouse East Non-ACM 42-133 Penthouse East Non-ACM No Photo Available 42-134 Penthouse East Non-ACM

No Photo Available

44-138 3rd Floor Corridor 30% Chrysotile 44-139 3rd Floor Corridor N/A No Photo Available 44-140 3rd Floor Corridor N/A

45-141 3rd Floor Courtrooms Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

45-142 3rd Floor Courtrooms Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative No Photo Available

45-143 3rd Floor Courtrooms Tile= Non-ACM Mastic Negative

46-144 2nd Floor Room 219 Linoleum = Non-ACM Mastic Negative

46-145 2nd Floor Room 219 Linoleum = Non-ACM Mastic Negative No Photo Available

46-146 2nd Floor Room 219 Linoleum = Non-ACM Mastic Negative

47-135 Basement Shop Non-ACM 47-136 Basement Shop Non-ACM No Photo Available 47-137 Basement Shop Non-ACM

ASSUMED ACM

NQ ASSUMED ACM No Photo Available

ASSUMED ACM

MM Acoustical Wall Panels-3rd Floor

Courtrooms Not Sampled

E-46 MM Linoleum Flooring-White- 2nd Floor

E-47 MM 2'X2' Ceiling Tile-Fissured/Older

E-48

E-44 TSI Aircell Board on Radiator Boxes - 3rd Floor

E-45 MM 24"x24" Floor Tile - 3rd Floor Courtrooms

E-42 MM HVAC-Vibration Isolation Cloth

E-43 Inadvertently Omitted

NQ-

- 400 sf

- NQ

- NQ

- NQ

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type Photos

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova Date: October 6, 2005Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

ASSUMED ACM

NQ ASSUMED ACM No Photo Available

ASSUMED ACM

ASSUMED ACM

ASSUMED ACM No Photo Available

ASSUMED ACM

Notes:

Materials Tested and/or Documented By Versar Materials Previously Tested By ENSR International

ND= No asbestos fibers detected NS= Not Sampled or Submitted as directed by GSA NA=Not Analyzed NQ= Not Quantified - Material is non-ACM sf= square feet lf= linear feet cf= cubic feet

E-49 MM Fire Doors - Basement Not Sampled

E-50 MM Rolled Roofing - Garage Not Sampled

Mat'l Types: Thermal System Insulation (TSI), Surfacing Material (SM), Miscellaneous Material (MM)

14,000 sf

Table 2

Asbestos Inventory and Management Assessment

Asbestos Inventory

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

Date: October 6, 2005

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Influence of

Vibration Potential for Air

Erosion Assess. Cat. Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type Notes

Not Sampled Assumed Positive Not Sampled Assumed Positive

Not Sampled Assumed Positive Not Sampled Assumed Positive Not Sampled Assumed Positive

Not Sampled Assumed Positive

1-001 Basement Room 030 Tile= 2% Chrysotile, Mastic Negative

1-002 Basement Room 030 N/A 1-003 Basement Room 030 N/A 5-013 Boiler Room 30% Chrysotile 5-014 Boiler Room N/A 5-015 Boiler Room N/A 7-019 Basement Break Room 30% Chrysotile 7-020 Basement Break Room N/A 7-021 Basement West N/A

10-028 Basement Shop Mastic 3% 10-029 Basement Shop N/A 10-030 Basement Shop N/A

11-031 Basement Room 020 Tile= Non-ACM Mastic 3%

11-032 Basement Room 020 N/A 11-033 Basement Room 020 N/A

14-040 Basement West 27% Chrysotile 3% Amosite

14-041 Basement Mechanical Room N/A 14-042 Basement Mechanical Room N/A

18-056 Basement Building Shop Tile=Trace Chrysotile Mastic= Non-ACM

18-057 Basement East Tile = 2% Chrysotile Mastic= Non-ACM

18-058 Basement East N/A

19-059 Basement West Tile= Non-ACM Mastic 2%

19-060 Basement West Tile= Non-ACM Mastic -N/A

19-061 Basement West Tile= Non-ACM Mastic -N/A

Condition Friability Access

V-02 MM

Main Roof - High Roof (Roof, Caulk)

Assumed Positive per GSA

1 1 X Throughout Main Roof

1 1

V-04 MM Lower Roof (Roof, Caulk)

1 1 1 X Throughout Lower Roof

7 700 sf11NE-1 MM 12"x12" Floor Tile, Off White with Brown Specks

E-5

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova

- 3

TSI Boiler Breaching Insulation - 2 F 1 2 2 7 500 sf

E-7 TSI Domestic Pipe Insulation-Wool Felt

- 2 N 2 2 2 7 15,000 sf

E-10 MM 9"x9" Floor Tile, Black with White Streaks

- 2 N 3 1 1 7 5,260 sf

E-11 MM 9"x9" Floor Tile, Maroon - 2 N 3 1 1 7 2,500 sf

E-14 TSI Steam Line Insulation-Mag Block

- 2 F 1 2 2 7 10,000 lf

E-18 MM 9"x9" Floor Tile, Beige - 2 N 3 1 1 7 1,000 sf

E-19 MM 9"x9" Floor Tile, Black with white & green streaks

- 7 180 sf

Assumed Positive per GSA

2 N 1 1 1

Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

Date: October 6, 2005

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Influence of

Vibration Potential for Air

Erosion Assess. Cat. Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type NotesCondition Friability Access

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

20-062 Basement Janitors Closet and Break Room 20% Chrysotile

20-063 Basement Janitors Closet and Break Room N/A

20-064 Basement Janitors Closet and Break Room N/A

22-072 Basement Archives 25% Chrysotile 22-073 Basement Archives N/A 22-074 Basement Archives N/A 23-075 Basement South 30% Chrysotile 23-076 Mezzanine N/A 23-077 Mezzanine N/A 27-087 Basement-Garage Shop 10% Chrysotile 27-088 Basement-Garage Shop N/A 27-089 Basement-Garage Shop N/A

28-090 Basement Custodial Office Tile= Non-ACM Mastic- Trace

28-091 Basement Custodial Office Tile= Non-ACM Mastic 2%

28-092 Basement Custodial Office N/A

32-102 2nd Floor Room 224 Tile= Non-ACM Mastic 2%

32-103 1st Floor - Room 123 Tile= Non-ACM Mastic-N/A

32-104 1st Floor - Room 123 Tile= Non-ACM Mastic- N/A

37-117 4th Floor Storage 28% Chrysotile 2% Crocidolite

37-118 4th Floor Storage N/A 37-119 4th Floor Storage N/A 44-138 3rd Floor Corridor 30% Chrysotile 44-139 3rd Floor Corridor N/A 44-140 3rd Floor Corridor N/A

ASSUMED ACM

ASSUMED ACM

ASSUMED ACM

TSI

TSI

E-20

2 FE-22

E-37 MM Duct Insulation , 4th Floor - Hard / Gray

E-48 MM Acoustical Wall Panels-3rd Floor Courtrooms

Duct Insulation on Small Duct

Duct Insulation on Abandoned Duct Work

- 1 300 sf

F 2

2 2

2 7 24,000 sf

7 250 sf

2 60 sf712

E-23 TSI Air Handler Insulation-Corners On Fiberglass

- 2 N 1 2

E-27 MM Transite Wall Board - 2 N 1 1 1

E-28 MM 12"x12" Floor Tile, Tan with Brown Streaks

- 2 N 1 1 1 7 2,500 sf

E-32 MM 12"x12" Floor Tile, Beige Marbled Pattern

- 2 N 1 1 1 300 sf

- 2 F 1

E-44 TSI Aircell Board on Radiator Boxes - 3rd Floor

7 400 sf

2 F 1 2 2

2 2 7 200 sf

Not Sampled NQ1 1 72 F

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Columbus, Ohio

Date: October 6, 2005

HSA ID Material Type Material Description Sample # Sample Location Other Locations Influence of

Vibration Potential for Air

Erosion Assess. Cat. Quantity Asbestos Fibers % & Type NotesCondition Friability Access

Inspectors: Curt Cannon/Shaun Terranova Building: J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Blvd., Columbus, Ohio

ASSUMED ACM

NQ ASSUMED ACM

ASSUMED ACM

ASSUMED ACM

ASSUMED ACM

ASSUMED ACM

Notes:

ND= No asbestos fibers detected NS= Not Sampled as directed by Phil Ramos NQ=Not Quantified - Material is non-ACM sf= square feet lf= linear feet 6 = ACM with potential for significant damage.

NA=Not Analyzed 7 = Any remaining friable ACM or friable suspected ACM.

NF=Non-Friable X = N/A (matl is non-ACM or nonfriable surfacing or misc matl).

None = No assessment category provided in original survey.

Key:

Influence of Vibration: 1-Low 2-Medium 3-High Potential for Air Erosion: 1-Low 2-Medium 3-High

E-49 MM Fire Doors - Basement N 1 711

N 1 1 1

Condition: 1-No damage 2-Slighly Damaged 3-Damaged 4-Significantly Damaged Accessibility: 1-Low 2-Medium 3-High

-E-50 MM

3 = Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM.

4 = Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM.

Mat'l Types: Thermal System Insulation (TSI), Surfacing Material (SM), Miscellaneous Material (MM)

AHERA Assessment Categories:

1 = Damaged or significantly damaged TSI ACM.

2 = Damaged friable surfacing ACM.

Rolled Roofing - Garage 14,000 sf7

Not Sampled

Not Sampled

Table 3

Lead-Based Paint Survey Summary

Table 3 Lead-Based Paint Survey Summary

J.P. Kinneary U.S. Courthouse 85 Marconi Boulevard

Co…