Instructions_for_Questionnaire112812.pdf
PDF 18 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- GS-04P-13-BV-C-0002
About this file
Revised Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions_for_Lexington.pdf | ||
| amendment.pdf | ||
| Instructions_for_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attendance_to_Pre-proposal_Lexington.pdf | ||
| Preproposal_Agenda_lexington.doc | DOC document | |
| FBO_Phase_1_lexington112812.pdf | ||
| Questionnaire_Lexington.docx | DOCX document | |
| Certs_lexington.pdf | ||
| FBO_Phase_1_lexington.pdf | ||
| DOCUMENT_SECURITY.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions for Questionnaire
Dear Respondent, The United States General Services Administration would like to thank you for taking the time to assist us in the selection of a Design-Build Contractor for our Project. Please complete the questionnaire to the best of your ability.
We ask that you keep your responses to this questionnaire confidential. The information you provide on this questionnaire will not be shared with the Offeror.
When completed, please send a scanned or electronic copy of the questionnaire to the following e-mail address:
Kiersten.Mathews@gsa.gov. We ask that you include the following information in the subject line of the e-mail:
Solicitation No. GS-04P-13-BV-C-0002. If you are unable to e-mail the questionnaire, please mail the completed questionnaire to:
Kiersten S. Mathews, Contracting Officer U.S. General Services Administration
Southeast Sunbelt Region Acquisition Division (4PQA)
77 Forsyth Street, SW Suite T-8
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
The questionnaire shall be placed in a sealed envelope with an original signature of the Respondent to the questionnaire across the envelope seal. Also include the following statement on the envelope:
Confidential- Information enclosed is for the sole use of the Government.
We ask that the questionnaire be returned to the Contracting Officer ON or BEFORE January 4, 2013 @ 12:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
We appreciate your time and efforts in assisting us in serving the American public.
Performance Questionnaire
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection
Please forward your responses to:
General Services Administration Desired Response Date:
Attn: Kiersten S. Mathews, Contracting Officer Acquisition Division, 4PQA 77 Forsyth Street, SW Suite T-8 Atlanta, GA 30303 Or Email: Kiersten.Mathews@gsa.gov
When complete, the information on this form is Source Selection Information (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
To Be Completed by GSA
1. CONTRACTOR NAME AND ADDRESS: 2. PROJECT TO BE EVALUATED:
Name of Offeror:
Name of Contact:
Company:
To Be Completed by Evaluating Organization
3. EVALUATION:
Evaluator’s Name:
Organization:
Position (Project Manager, COR, CO, etc.):
Evaluator’s Phone Number:
Time Period Monitored:
Email Address:
Please circle the response code for each topic (A-F) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.
5 = Exceptional 4 = Very Good 3 = Satisfactory 2 = Marginal 1 = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed
Location of Contract Performance:
Approx. contract start/completion dates:
Approx. Price/cost for construction at contract start:
Approx. Price/cost for construction at contract completion:
Type of building and no. of stories:
Contract type (Firm-Fixed Price, Guaranteed Maximum Price, Cost Plus Fee, Identify Other):
Project delivery method (Design-Build, Design-Build-Bridging, or Identify Other):
New construction or renovation:
If renovation, occupied during construction (Y/N):
To the best of your ability please briefly answer the following:
1. Did the project stay within the original contract schedule and budget? If not, was it due to factors within the control of the Contractor requesting this evaluation?
How would you rate the working relationship with the project team during the project, and would you work with them again (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, N/O = Not Observed)? Please briefly explain.
2. How would you rate the responsiveness in administrative areas (e.g. processing necessary paperwork) (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, N/O = Not Observed)? Please briefly explain.
3. How would you rate the quality of the design documents (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, N/O = Not Observed)? Please briefly explain.
4. How would you rate the efforts in avoiding or mitigating scheduling issues during construction (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, N/O = Not Observed)? Please briefly explain.
5 How would you rate the quality of the final product (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, N/O = Not Observed)? Did the finished product meet the needs and expectations (Y/N)? Please briefly explain:
6 How would you rate the overall performance of the Design Builder requesting this evaluation (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, N/O = Not Observed)?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .