SECTION_J.8.,_ATT._(8)_OASIS_SB_PAST_PERFORMANCE_RATING_FORM_ON_RAMP.docx

DOCX document 40 KB Posted

Attached to
One Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services (OASIS) Small Business (SB) Multiple Award (MA), Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) solicitation. - GS00Q-13-DR-0002
Solicitation number
GS00Q-13-DR-0002-P1P3P4
Issued by

About this file

This document provides a past performance rating form for the OASIS Small Business Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity solicitation issued by the General Services Administration Federal Acquisition Service. The rating form collects feedback on five performance criteria - quality of service, schedule, cost control, business relations, and management of key personnel - on a scale of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. Raters are instructed to provide comments for any marginal or unsatisfactory ratings. The solicitation seeks to award IDIQ contracts for integrated professional services covering areas such as communications, compliance, defense, disaster response, energy, environment, finance, health, intelligence, security, and transportation. The period of performance for OASIS SB task orders is one base year with four one-year options issued by any federal agency.

OASIS SB Pools 1, 3, 4 Att. J.8

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SECTION_J.2.,_ATT_(2)_OASIS_DIRECT_LABOR_RANGES.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.19._ATT._(19)_SYMPHONY_INSTRUCTIONS.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.5._ATT._(5)OASIS_SB_SAMPLE_SELF_SCORING_WORKSHEET_ON_RAMP.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_Amd_0.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.13_ATT_(13)_OASIS_SB_GSA_FORM_527_ON_RAMP.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.11.,_ATT._(11)_OASIS_SB_REPS_AND_CERTS_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.1.,_ATT._(1)_OASIS_SB_LABOR_CATEGORIES_AND_DEFINITIONS_POOL_1,_3,_4_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.20_ATT._(20)_OASIS_SB_CTA_AGREEMENT.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.9.,_ATT._(9)_COST_PRICE_TEMPLATE_ON_RAMP.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SECTION_J.14.,_ATT._(14)_OASIS_SB_NAICS_OR_PSC_CODE_CORRECTION_LETTER_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.6._ATT._(6)_OASIS_SB_MODIFIED_PRE-AWARD_SURVEY_(SF_1408)_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.16_Attachment_(16)_OASIS_FSSCTA_Performance_Verification_Letter.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.12._ATT._(12)_OASIS_SB_SUBCONTRACTING_PLAN_TEMPLATE_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp.pdf PDF
SF33_Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.15._ATT._(15)_OASIS_SB_NAICS_CODE_CHANGE_LETTER_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1_On-Ramp_Amd_05.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.5.1._ATT._(5A)_Amd_4_OASIS_SB_SELF_SCORING_WORKSHEET_ON_RAMP_POOL_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SECTION_J.12._ATT._(12)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_SUBCONTRACTING_PLAN_TEMPLATE_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.4.,_ATT._(4)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_PROPOSAL_CHECKLIST_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.16_Attachment_(16)_Amd_3_OASIS_FSSCTA_Performance_Verification_Letter.docx DOCX document
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1_On-Ramp_Amd_02.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.1.,_ATT._(1)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_LABOR_CATEGORIES_AND_DEFINITIONS_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.5.2._ATT._(5B)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_SAMPLE_SELF_SCORING_WORKSHEET_ON_RAMP_POOL_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SECTION_J.11.,_ATT._(11)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_REPS_AND_CERTS_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.7_ATT_(7)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_REL_EXP_PRIMARY_PROJ_TEMP_POOL_1__ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_Amendment_03_OASIS_SB_P1_On-Ramp.pdf PDF
Section_J.17_Attachment_(17)_Solicitation_Q&As.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.15._ATT._(15)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_NAICS_CODE_CHANGE_LETTER_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.10_ATT_(10)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_REL_EXP_SECONDARY_PROJ_TEMP_POOL1_ONRAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.2.,_ATT_(2)_Amd_3_OASIS_DIRECT_LABOR_RANGES.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.18_Attachment_(18)_Amd_3_General_Correspondence_Template.doc DOC document
SECTION_J.3.,_ATT._(3)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_POOL_APPLICATION_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.9.,_ATT._(9)_Amd_3_COST_PRICE_TEMPLATE_ON_RAMP_POOL_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SECTION_J.8.,_ATT._(8)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_PAST_PERFORMANCE_RATING_FORM_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
Section_J.19_attachment_(19)_Amd_3_GSA_Affiliated_Customer_Account_(GACA)_Instructions.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.6._ATT._(6)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_MODIFIED_PRE-AWARD_SURVEY_(SF_1408)_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.14.,_ATT._(14)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_NAICS_OR_PSC_CODE_CORRECTION_LETTER_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SF33_Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1_On-Ramp_Amd03.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.13_ATT_(13)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_GSA_FORM_527_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.5.1._ATT._(5A)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_SELF_SCORING_WORKSHEET_ON_RAMP_POOL_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section_J.17_Attachment_(17)_Solicitation_Q&A.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.13_ATT_(13)_Amd_02_OASIS_SB_GSA_FORM_527_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.4.,_ATT._(4)_Amd_0_OASIS_SB_PROPOSAL_CHECKLIST_POOL_1_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
Block_14_Continuation_Page.docx DOCX document
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1_On-Ramp_Amd_02.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.9.,_ATT._(9)_Amd_02_COST_PRICE_TEMPLATE_ON_RAMP_POOL_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_Amendment_02_OASIS_SB_P1_On-Ramp.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.2.,_ATT_(2)_Amd_02_OASIS_SB_Pool_1_ON_RAMP_DIRECT_LABOR_RANGES.pdf PDF
SF33_Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1_On-Ramp_Amd02.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 205 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

OASIS SMALL BUSINESS SOLICITATION

ON-RAMP (POOL 1, 3, 4)

SOLICITATION NO. GS00Q-13-DR-0002

SECTION J.8. ATTACHMENT (8)

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM

INSTRUCTIONS

If applicable in accordance with Section L.5.4. of the solicitation, the Offeror must provide this Past Performance Rating Form to the Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer Representative or Program Manager of the awarding agency responsible for the project. No other format is allowable. The awarding agency must provide the form back to the Offeror in .pdf format for the Offeror to be able to fill out their Self Scoring Worksheet and to submit the form with their proposal. The awarding agency may at their discretion provide the OASIS Program Management Office a copy by e-mailing it to OASISSB@gsa.gov

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):

CONTRACTOR NAME:
Click here to enter text.
CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:
Click here to enter text.
PROJECT TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS
Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):

NAME:
Click here to enter text.
TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER:
Click here to enter text.
PHONE:
Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL
Click here to enter text.

For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

2. SCHEDULE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

3. COST CONTROL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A

Click here to enter text.

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .