SECTION_J.7_ATT_(7)_Amd_3_OASIS_SB_REL_EXP_PRIMARY_PROJ_TEMP_POOL_1__ON_RAMP.docx

OASIS SMALL BUSINESS SOLICITATION

ON-RAMP (POOL 1)

SOLICITATION NO. GS00Q-13-DR-0002

SECTION J.7. ATTACHMENT (7)

Amendment 03

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE (PRIMARY) PROJECT TEMPLATE

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Reference Sections L.5.3. through L.5.3.2.8. for complete instructions. See Section M.5.1. through M.5.1.8. for how Offerors will be evaluated.

2. This template provides a section for each of the Relevant Experience (Primary) Projects submitted.

3. The Offeror must submit a Minimum of 3 Projects up to a Maximum of 5 Projects. If the Offeror only chooses to submit 3 Projects, leave PROJECT 4 AND PROJECT 5 TEMPLATE blank. If the Offeror chooses to only submit 4 Projects, leave PROJECT 5 TEMPLATE blank. If 1 of the projects is based on a “Collection of Task Orders” from a Single-Award IDIQ or BPA, leave PROJECT 5 TEMPLATE blank and use the PROJECT 5 - ALTERNATE TEMPLATE.

4. Offerors shall respond to all questions and requests, as applicable.

5. All proposal documentation associated with this template shall be scanned documents in PDF format.

6. All file documentation for validation shall be highlighted/identified within the scanned documents.

7. All file documentation for validation shall be included in Volume 3 of the Offeror’s proposal submission. See Proposal Format Table in Section L.4.

8. All explanations are limited to no more than 125 words.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 1 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

1. Who is the PRIME CONTRACTOR under the Contract or Task Order?

Note: In order to substantiate the Prime Contractor Name, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of the Contract or Task Order in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. If the Contract or Task Order was awarded under a different name than the Offeror, then the Offeror shall provide a copy of a Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter or other Agreement (e.g., Novation, etc.) as applicable or in the event of Federal Supply Schedule Contractor Teaming Agreements (FSSCTA) please see note 2 below. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

Note: Also complete Section J.16_Attachment (16)_OASIS_FSSCTA_Performance_Verification_Letter.docx. for FSS Task orders or FSS BPA Calls which were awarded on an FSS Contractor Teaming Arrangement (CTA) basis. It does NOT apply to FAR 9.601 (1) or (2) CTAs.

2. What is the CONTRACT OR TASK ORDER NUMBER of the project?

Note: In order to substantiate the Contract or Task Order number, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of Contract or Task Order in Volume 3 of the proposal submission.

3. What is the TYPE OF VEHICLE? (Check only one):

|_| CONTRACT (NOT a Task Order)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE (FAR 8.405-2)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A MASTER IDIQ TASK ORDER CONTRACT (FAR 16.501-1)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (FAR 8.405-3 or FAR 13.303)

4. Provide a PRIMARY Reference: (Person who can verify all the Contract or Task Order data - Government Contracting Officer, Project/Program Manager, or Contracting Officer Representative)

5. Does the project meet the minimum PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE requirement (Ongoing or Completed) within the past 5 years prior to the solicitation closing date or at least 1 year prior to the solicitation closing date with a completed CPAR, Award Fee rating, or the period of performance is less than 1 year and it is completed?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, what is/was the PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, including Options?

Note: The Offeror shall provide excerpt(s) from verifiable documentation to substantiate the Period of Performance in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

6. Does the project meet the minimum requirement for the ANNUAL PROJECT VALUE OF AT LEAST $150,000 PER YEAR?

|_| Yes

|_| No

Note: The Offeror shall provide excerpt(s) from verifiable documentation to substantiate the Annual Project Value in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 1 – SCORING RELATED INFORMATION

1. Was the project solicited under or reported under a NAICS OR PSC CODE that correlates any NAICS CODE OR PSC CODE in the Table under Section L.5.3.2.1.?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, what was the Predominant NAICS or PSC CODE that this project was solicited under or reported under in FPDS-NG or other documentation? (Provide only one)

Note: Offeror shall provide the FPDS-NG report, if available. If the FPDS-NG report is unavailable, the Offeror shall provide excerpts of the Contract or Task Order solicitation or other documentation that validates the NAICS or PSC Code in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

If the NAICS or PSC Code was reported incorrectly or changed, provide a letter formatted in accordance with Section J.14 or J.15. from a Warranted Contracting Officer in accordance with the instructions in Section L.5.3.2.1. in Volume 3 of the proposal submission.

2. What is/was the ANNUAL AVERAGE DOLLAR VALUE PER YEAR of the project? (Check only one)

|_| $150,000 < $750K (No additional points)

|_| $750K < $2M

|_| $2M < $4M

|_| $4M < $6M

|_| > $6M

Briefly explain how you calculated the Annual Average Dollar Value Per Year

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Annual Average Dollar value in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

3. Which CORE DISCIPLINES were performed on the project? (Check all that apply). . For additional points, the Offeror must have at least 4, up to 6, Core Disciplines under the project.

For each Core Discipline checked, briefly (125 words or less for each core discipline) explain the rationale supporting your assertion that each Core Discipline was performed. Provide this information next to each Core Discipline checked below.

|_| Program Management: Click here to enter text.

|_| Management Consulting: Click here to enter text.

|_| Engineering: Click here to enter text.

|_| Scientific: Click here to enter text.

|_| Financial Management: Click here to enter text.

|_| Logistics: Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Core Disciplines performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

4. Does the project involve performance in MULTIPLE locations? (Caution: See Section M.5.1.4. for how multiple locations is calculated. TDY less than 30 days does NOT count) |_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, Does the project involve performance in at least 2 and up to 4 different locations? (If 5 or more locations select No and go to the next question)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, Does the project involve performance in 5 or more different locations?

|_| No

If Yes, briefly explain each of the MULTIPLE locations and the type of work being performed in the space below: Limit explanation to at least 2 up to a maximum of 5.

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each location that work was performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

5. Does the project involve performance of SUBCONTRACTING or TEAMING of AT LEAST 3 SEPARATE ENTITIES/CONSULTANTS?

|_| Yes

If Yes, briefly identify who the Subcontractors/Teaming partners were and the work being done by each one of them. Limit explanation to at least 3 but, no more than 3, separate entities/consultants in the space provided below.

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates the Subcontracting/Teaming performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

6. Does the project involve performance of ANCILLARY SUPPORT SERVICES? (Caution: See definition in Section M.5.1.6)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the type of Ancillary Support Services provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each of the Ancillary Services performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

7. Does the project involve performance of ANCILLARY SUPPORT PRODUCTS? (Caution: See definition in Section M.5.1.6)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the Ancillary Support Products provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Ancillary Products provided in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

8. Does the project include Cost Reimbursement (any Cost type under FAR 16.3) as the Predominant Contract Type?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the type of Cost Reimbursement work provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the predominant Contract type of Cost Reimbursement work in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

9. Does the project involve performance in OCONUS locations?

|_| Yes

If Yes, briefly explain each of the OCONUS locations and the type of work being performed in the space below:

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each OCONUS place of performance in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

END OF PROJECT 1

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 2 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

Note: In order to substantiate the Prime Contractor Name, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of the Contract or Task Order in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. If the Contract or Task Order was awarded under a different name than the Offeror, then the Offeror shall provide a copy of a Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter or other Agreement (e.g., Novation, etc.) as applicable, or in the event of Federal Supply Schedule Contractor Teaming Agreements (FSSCTA) please see note 2 below. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

Note: Also complete Section J.16_Attachment (16)_OASIS_FSSCTA_Performance_Verification_Letter.docx. for FSS Task orders or FSS BPA Calls which were awarded on an FSS Contractor Teaming Arrangement (CTA) basis. It does NOT apply to FAR 9.601 (1) or (2) CTAs.

2. What is the CONTRACT OR TASK ORDER NUMBER of the project?

Note: In order to substantiate the Contract or Task Order number, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of Contract or Task Order in Volume 3 of the proposal submission.

|_| CONTRACT (NOT a Task Order)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE (FAR 8.405-2)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A MASTER IDIQ TASK ORDER CONTRACT (FAR 16.501-1)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (FAR 8.405-3 or FAR 13.303)

4. Provide a PRIMARY Reference: (Person who can verify all the Contract or Task Order data - Government Contracting Officer, Project/Program Manager, or Contracting Officer Representative)

5. Does the project meet the minimum PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE requirement (Ongoing or Completed) within the past 5 years prior to the solicitation closing date or at least 1 year prior to the solicitation closing date with a completed CPAR, Award Fee rating, or the period of performance is less than 1 year and it is completed?

|_| No

If Yes, what is/was the PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, including Options?

Note: The Offeror shall provide excerpt(s) from verifiable documentation to substantiate the Period of Performance in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

6. Does the project meet the minimum requirement for the ANNUAL PROJECT VALUE OF AT LEAST $150,000 PER YEAR?

|_| Yes

|_| No

Note: The Offeror shall provide excerpt(s) from verifiable documentation to substantiate the Annual Project Value in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 2 – SCORING RELATED INFORMATION

1. Was the project solicited under or reported under a NAICS OR PSC CODE that correlates any NAICS CODE OR PSC CODE in the Table under Section L.5.3.2.1.?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, what was the Predominant NAICS or PSC CODE that this project was solicited under or reported under in FPDS-NG or other documentation? (Provide only one)

Note: Offeror shall provide the FPDS-NG report, if available. If the FPDS-NG report is unavailable, the Offeror shall provide excerpts of the Contract or Task Order solicitation or other documentation that validates the NAICS or PSC Code in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

If the NAICS or PSC Code was reported incorrectly or changed, provide a letter formatted in accordance with Section J.14 or J.15. from a Warranted Contracting Officer in accordance with the instructions in Section L.5.3.2.1. in Volume 3 of the proposal submission.

2. What is/was the ANNUAL AVERAGE DOLLAR VALUE PER YEAR of the project? (Check only one)

|_| $150,000 < $750K (No additional points)

|_| $750K < $2M

|_| $2M < $4M

|_| $4M < $6M

|_| > $6M

Briefly explain how you calculated the Annual Average Dollar Value Per Year

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Annual Average Dollar value in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

3. Which CORE DISCIPLINES were performed on the project? (Check all that apply). . For additional points, the Offeror must have at least 4, up to 6, Core Disciplines under the project.

For each Core Discipline checked, briefly (125 words or less for each core discipline) explain the rationale supporting your assertion that each Core Discipline was performed. Provide this information next to each Core Discipline checked below.

|_| Program Management: Click here to enter text.

|_| Management Consulting: Click here to enter text.

|_| Engineering: Click here to enter text.

|_| Scientific: Click here to enter text.

|_| Financial Management: Click here to enter text.

|_| Logistics: Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Core Disciplines performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

4. Does the project involve performance in MULTIPLE locations? (Caution: See Section M.5.1.4. for how multiple locations is calculated. TDY less than 30 days does NOT count) |_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, Does the project involve performance in at least 2 and up to 4 different locations? (If 5 or more locations select No and go to the next question)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, Does the project involve performance in 5 or more different locations?

If Yes, briefly explain each of the MULTIPLE locations and the type of work being performed in the space below: Limit explanation to at least 2 up to a maximum of 5.

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each location that work was performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

5. Does the project involve performance of SUBCONTRACTING or TEAMING of AT LEAST 3 SEPARATE ENTITIES/CONSULTANTS?

|_| Yes

If Yes, briefly identify who the Subcontractors/Teaming partners were and the work being done by each one of them. Limit explanation to at least 3 but, no more than 3, separate entities/consultants in the space provided below.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates the Subcontracting/Teaming performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

6. Does the project involve performance of ANCILLARY SUPPORT SERVICES? (Caution: See definition in Section M.5.1.6)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the type of Ancillary Support Services provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each of the Ancillary Services performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

7. Does the project involve performance of ANCILLARY SUPPORT PRODUCTS? (Caution: See definition in Section M.5.1.6)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the Ancillary Support Products provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Ancillary Products provided in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

8. Does the project include Cost Reimbursement (any Cost type under FAR 16.3) as the Predominant Contract Type?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the type of Cost Reimbursement work provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the predominant Contract type of Cost Reimbursement work in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

|_| Yes

If Yes, briefly explain each of the OCONUS locations and the type of work being performed in the space below:

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each OCONUS place of performance in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

END OF PROJECT 2

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 3 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

Note: In order to substantiate the Prime Contractor Name, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of the Contract or Task Order in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. If the Contract or Task Order was awarded under a different name than the Offeror, then the Offeror shall provide a copy of a Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter or other Agreement (e.g., Novation, etc.) as applicable, or in the event of Federal Supply Schedule Contractor Teaming Agreements (FSSCTA) please see note 2 below. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

Note: Also complete Section J.16_Attachment (16)_OASIS_FSSCTA_Performance_Verification_Letter.docx. for FSS Task orders or FSS BPA Calls which were awarded on an FSS Contractor Teaming Arrangement (CTA) basis. It does NOT apply to FAR 9.601 (1) or (2) CTAs.

2. What is the CONTRACT OR TASK ORDER NUMBER of the project?

Note: In order to substantiate the Contract or Task Order number, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of Contract or Task Order in Volume 3 of the proposal submission.

|_| CONTRACT (NOT a Task Order)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE (FAR 8.405-2)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A MASTER IDIQ TASK ORDER CONTRACT (FAR 16.501-1)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (FAR 8.405-3 or FAR 13.303)

4. Provide a PRIMARY Reference: (Person who can verify all the Contract or Task Order data - Government Contracting Officer, Project/Program Manager, or Contracting Officer Representative)

5. Does the project meet the minimum PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE requirement (Ongoing or Completed) within the past 5 years prior to the solicitation closing date or at least 1 year prior to the solicitation closing date with a completed CPAR, Award Fee rating, or the period of performance is less than 1 year and it is completed?

|_| No

If Yes, what is/was the PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, including Options?

Note: The Offeror shall provide excerpt(s) from verifiable documentation to substantiate the Period of Performance in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

6. Does the project meet the minimum requirement for the ANNUAL PROJECT VALUE OF AT LEAST $150,000 PER YEAR?

|_| Yes

|_| No

Note: The Offeror shall provide excerpt(s) from verifiable documentation to substantiate the Annual Project Value in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 3 – SCORING RELATED INFORMATION

1. Was the project solicited under or reported under a NAICS OR PSC CODE that correlates any NAICS CODE OR PSC CODE in the Table under Section L.5.3.2.1.?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, what was the Predominant NAICS or PSC CODE that this project was solicited under or reported under in FPDS-NG or other documentation? (Provide only one)

Note: Offeror shall provide the FPDS-NG report, if available. If the FPDS-NG report is unavailable, the Offeror shall provide excerpts of the Contract or Task Order solicitation or other documentation that validates the NAICS or PSC Code in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

If the NAICS or PSC Code was reported incorrectly or changed, provide a letter formatted in accordance with Section J.14 or J.15. from a Warranted Contracting Officer in accordance with the instructions in Section L.5.3.2.1. in Volume 3 of the proposal submission.

2. What is/was the ANNUAL AVERAGE DOLLAR VALUE PER YEAR of the project? (Check only one)

|_| $150,000 < $750K (No additional points)

|_| $750K < $2M

|_| $2M < $4M

|_| $4M < $6M

|_| > $6M

Briefly explain how you calculated the Annual Average Dollar Value Per Year

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Annual Average Dollar value in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

3. Which CORE DISCIPLINES were performed on the project? (Check all that apply). . For additional points, the Offeror must have at least 4, up to 6, Core Disciplines under the project.

For each Core Discipline checked, briefly (125 words or less for each core discipline) explain the rationale supporting your assertion that each Core Discipline was performed. Provide this information next to each Core Discipline checked below.

|_| Program Management: Click here to enter text.

|_| Management Consulting: Click here to enter text.

|_| Engineering: Click here to enter text.

|_| Scientific: Click here to enter text.

|_| Financial Management: Click here to enter text.

|_| Logistics: Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Core Disciplines performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

4. Does the project involve performance in MULTIPLE locations? (Caution: See Section M.5.1.4. for how multiple locations is calculated. TDY less than 30 days does NOT count) |_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, Does the project involve performance in at least 2 and up to 4 different locations? (If 5 or more locations select No and go to the next question)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, Does the project involve performance in 5 or more different locations?

If Yes, briefly explain each of the MULTIPLE locations and the type of work being performed in the space below: Limit explanation to at least 2 up to a maximum of 5.

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each location that work was performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

5. Does the project involve performance of SUBCONTRACTING or TEAMING of AT LEAST 3 SEPARATE ENTITIES/CONSULTANTS?

|_| Yes

If Yes, briefly identify who the Subcontractors/Teaming partners were and the work being done by each one of them. Limit explanation to at least 3 but, no more than 3, separate entities/consultants in the space provided below.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates the Subcontracting/Teaming performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

6. Does the project involve performance of ANCILLARY SUPPORT SERVICES? (Caution: See definition in Section M.5.1.6)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the type of Ancillary Support Services provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each of the Ancillary Services performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

7. Does the project involve performance of ANCILLARY SUPPORT PRODUCTS? (Caution: See definition in Section M.5.1.6)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the Ancillary Support Products provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Ancillary Products provided in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

8. Does the project include Cost Reimbursement (any Cost type under FAR 16.3) as the Predominant Contract Type?

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the type of Cost Reimbursement work provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the predominant Contract type of Cost Reimbursement work in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

|_| Yes

If Yes, briefly explain each of the OCONUS locations and the type of work being performed in the space below:

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each OCONUS place of performance in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

END OF PROJECT 3

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 4 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

Note: In order to substantiate the Prime Contractor Name, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of the Contract or Task Order in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. If the Contract or Task Order was awarded under a different name than the Offeror, then the Offeror shall provide a copy of a Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter or other Agreement (e.g., Novation, etc.) as applicable, or in the event of Federal Supply Schedule Contractor Teaming Agreements (FSSCTA) please see note 2 below. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

Note: Also complete Section J.16_Attachment (16)_OASIS_FSSCTA_Performance_Verification_Letter.docx. for FSS Task orders or FSS BPA Calls which were awarded on an FSS Contractor Teaming Arrangement (CTA) basis. It does NOT apply to FAR 9.601 (1) or (2) CTAs.

2. What is the CONTRACT OR TASK ORDER NUMBER of the project?

Note: In order to substantiate the Contract or Task Order number, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of Contract or Task Order in Volume 3 of the proposal submission.

|_| CONTRACT (NOT a Task Order)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE (FAR 8.405-2)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A MASTER IDIQ TASK ORDER CONTRACT (FAR 16.501-1)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (FAR 8.405-3 or FAR 13.303)

4. Provide a PRIMARY Reference: (Person who can verify all the Contract or Task Order data - Government Contracting Officer, Project/Program Manager, or Contracting Officer Representative)

5. Does the project meet the minimum PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE requirement (Ongoing or Completed) within the past 5 years prior to the solicitation closing date or at least 1 year prior to the solicitation closing date with a completed CPAR, Award Fee rating, or the period of performance is less than 1 year and it is completed?

|_| No

If Yes, what is/was the PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, including Options?

Note: The Offeror shall provide excerpt(s) from verifiable documentation to substantiate the Period of Performance in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

6. Does the project meet the minimum requirement for the ANNUAL PROJECT VALUE OF AT LEAST $150,000 PER YEAR?

|_| Yes

|_| No

Note: The Offeror shall provide excerpt(s) from verifiable documentation to substantiate the Annual Project Value in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 4 – SCORING RELATED INFORMATION

1. Was the project solicited under or reported under a NAICS OR PSC CODE that correlates any NAICS CODE OR PSC CODE in the Table under Section L.5.3.2.1.?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, what was the Predominant NAICS or PSC CODE that this project was solicited under or reported under in FPDS-NG or other documentation? (Provide only one)

Note: Offeror shall provide the FPDS-NG report, if available. If the FPDS-NG report is unavailable, the Offeror shall provide excerpts of the Contract or Task Order solicitation or other documentation that validates the NAICS or PSC Code in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

If the NAICS or PSC Code was reported incorrectly or changed, provide a letter formatted in accordance with Section J.14 or J.15. from a Warranted Contracting Officer in accordance with the instructions in Section L.5.3.2.1. in Volume 3 of the proposal submission.

2. What is/was the ANNUAL AVERAGE DOLLAR VALUE PER YEAR of the project? (Check only one)

|_| $150,000 < $750K (No additional points)

|_| $750K < $2M

|_| $2M < $4M

|_| $4M < $6M

|_| > $6M

Briefly explain how you calculated the Annual Average Dollar Value Per Year

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Annual Average Dollar value in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

3. Which CORE DISCIPLINES were performed on the project? (Check all that apply). . For additional points, the Offeror must have at least 4, up to 6, Core Disciplines under the project.

For each Core Discipline checked, briefly (125 words or less for each core discipline) explain the rationale supporting your assertion that each Core Discipline was performed. Provide this information next to each Core Discipline checked below.

|_| Program Management: Click here to enter text.

|_| Management Consulting: Click here to enter text.

|_| Engineering: Click here to enter text.

|_| Scientific: Click here to enter text.

|_| Financial Management: Click here to enter text.

|_| Logistics: Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Core Disciplines performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

4. Does the project involve performance in MULTIPLE locations? (Caution: See Section M.5.1.4. for how multiple locations is calculated. TDY less than 30 days does NOT count) |_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, Does the project involve performance in at least 2 and up to 4 different locations? (If 5 or more locations select No and go to the next question)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, Does the project involve performance in 5 or more different locations?

If Yes, briefly explain each of the MULTIPLE locations and the type of work being performed in the space below: Limit explanation to at least 2 up to a maximum of 5.

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each location that work was performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

5. Does the project involve performance of SUBCONTRACTING or TEAMING of AT LEAST 3 SEPARATE ENTITIES/CONSULTANTS?

|_| Yes

If Yes, briefly identify who the Subcontractors/Teaming partners were and the work being done by each one of them. Limit explanation to at least 3 but, no more than 3, separate entities/consultants in the space provided below.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates the Subcontracting/Teaming performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

6. Does the project involve performance of ANCILLARY SUPPORT SERVICES? (Caution: See definition in Section M.5.1.6)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the type of Ancillary Support Services provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each of the Ancillary Services performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

7. Does the project involve performance of ANCILLARY SUPPORT PRODUCTS? (Caution: See definition in Section M.5.1.6)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the Ancillary Support Products provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Ancillary Products provided in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

8. Does the project include Cost Reimbursement (any Cost type under FAR 16.3) as the Predominant Contract Type?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the type of Cost Reimbursement work provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the predominant Contract type of Cost Reimbursement work in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

|_| Yes

If Yes, briefly explain each of the OCONUS locations and the type of work being performed in the space below:

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each OCONUS place of performance in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

END OF PROJECT 4

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 5 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

Note: if Project 5, is a “Collection of Task Orders” skip to Project 5A.

1. Who is the PRIME CONTRACTOR under the Contract or Task Order?

Note: In order to substantiate the Prime Contractor Name, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of the Contract or Task Order in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. If the Contract or Task Order was awarded under a different name than the Offeror, then the Offeror shall provide a copy of a Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter or other Agreement (e.g., Novation, etc.) as applicable, or in the event of Federal Supply Schedule Contractor Teaming Agreements (FSSCTA) please see note 2 below. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

Note: Also complete Section J.16_Attachment (16)_OASIS_FSSCTA_Performance_Verification_Letter.docx. for FSS Task orders or FSS BPA Calls which were awarded on an FSS Contractor Teaming Arrangement (CTA) basis. It does NOT apply to FAR 9.601 (1) or (2) CTAs.

2. What is the CONTRACT OR TASK ORDER NUMBER of the project?

Note: In order to substantiate the Contract or Task Order number, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of Contract or Task Order in Volume 3 of the proposal submission.

|_| CONTRACT (NOT a Task Order)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE (FAR 8.405-2)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A MASTER IDIQ TASK ORDER CONTRACT (FAR 16.501-1)

|_| TASK ORDER UNDER A BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (FAR 8.405-3 or FAR 13.303)

4. Provide a PRIMARY Reference: (Person who can verify all the Contract or Task Order data - Government Contracting Officer, Project/Program Manager, or Contracting Officer Representative)

5. Does the project meet the minimum PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE requirement (Ongoing or Completed) within the past 5 years prior to the solicitation closing date or at least 1 year prior to the solicitation closing date with a completed CPAR, Award Fee ratomg, or the period of performance is less than 1 year and it is completed?

|_| No

If Yes, what is/was the PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, including Options?

Note: The Offeror shall provide excerpt(s) from verifiable documentation to substantiate the Period of Performance in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

6. Does the project meet the minimum requirement for the ANNUAL PROJECT VALUE OF AT LEAST $150,000 PER YEAR?

|_| Yes

|_| No

Note: The Offeror shall provide excerpt(s) from verifiable documentation to substantiate the Annual Project Value in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 5 – SCORING RELATED INFORMATION

1. Was the project solicited under or reported under a NAICS OR PSC CODE that correlates any NAICS CODE OR PSC CODE in the Table under Section L.5.3.2.1.?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, what was the Predominant NAICS or PSC CODE that this project was solicited under or reported under in FPDS-NG or other documentation? (Provide only one)

Note: Offeror shall provide the FPDS-NG report, if available. If the FPDS-NG report is unavailable, the Offeror shall provide excerpts of the Contract or Task Order solicitation or other documentation that validates the NAICS or PSC Code in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

If the NAICS or PSC Code was reported incorrectly or changed, provide a letter formatted in accordance with Section J.14 or J.15. from a Warranted Contracting Officer in accordance with the instructions in Section L.5.3.2.1. in Volume 3 of the proposal submission.

2. What is/was the ANNUAL AVERAGE DOLLAR VALUE PER YEAR of the project? (Check only one)

|_| $150,000 < $750K (No additional points)

|_| $750K < $2M

|_| $2M < $4M

|_| $4M < $6M

|_| > $6M

Briefly explain how you calculated the Annual Average Dollar Value Per Year

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Annual Average Dollar value in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

3. Which CORE DISCIPLINES were performed on the project? (Check all that apply). . For additional points, the Offeror must have at least 4, up to 6, Core Disciplines under the project.

For each Core Discipline checked, briefly (125 words or less for each core discipline) explain the rationale supporting your assertion that each Core Discipline was performed. Provide this information next to each Core Discipline checked below.

|_| Program Management: Click here to enter text.

|_| Management Consulting: Click here to enter text.

|_| Engineering: Click here to enter text.

|_| Scientific: Click here to enter text.

|_| Financial Management: Click here to enter text.

|_| Logistics: Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Core Disciplines performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

4. Does the project involve performance in MULTIPLE locations? (Caution: See Section M.5.1.4. for how multiple locations is calculated. TDY less than 30 days does NOT count) |_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, Does the project involve performance in at least 2 and up to 4 different locations? (If 5 or more locations select No and go to the next question)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, Does the project involve performance in 5 or more different locations?

If Yes, briefly explain each of the MULTIPLE locations and the type of work being performed in the space below: Limit explanation to at least 2 up to a maximum of 5.

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each location that work was performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

5. Does the project involve performance of SUBCONTRACTING or TEAMING of AT LEAST 3 SEPARATE ENTITIES/CONSULTANTS?

|_| Yes

If Yes, briefly identify who the Subcontractors/Teaming partners were and the work being done by each one of them. Limit explanation to at least 3 but, no more than 3, separate entities/consultants in the space provided below.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates the Subcontracting/Teaming performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

6. Does the project involve performance of ANCILLARY SUPPORT SERVICES? (Caution: See definition in Section M.5.1.6)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the type of Ancillary Support Services provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each of the Ancillary Services performed in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

7. Does the project involve performance of ANCILLARY SUPPORT PRODUCTS? (Caution: See definition in Section M.5.1.6)

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the Ancillary Support Products provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the Ancillary Products provided in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

8. Does the project include Cost Reimbursement (any Cost type under FAR 16.3) as the Predominant Contract Type?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, briefly describe the type of Cost Reimbursement work provided in the space below:

Click here to enter text.

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiate the predominant Contract type of Cost Reimbursement work in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

|_| Yes

If Yes, briefly explain each of the OCONUS locations and the type of work being performed in the space below:

Note: Offeror shall provide excerpts of Contract or Task Order documentation that substantiates each OCONUS place of performance in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

END OF PROJECT 5

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 5 ALTERNATE - BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

NOTE: Only complete this section of the template if the project is a “Collection of Task Orders” from a SINGLE-AWARD IDIQ or BPA.

1. Who is the PRIME CONTRACTOR under the Single-Award IDIQ or BPA?

Note: In order to substantiate the Prime Contractor Name, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of the IDIQ or BPA in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. If the IDIQ or BPA was awarded under a different name than the Offeror, then the Offeror shall provide a copy of a Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter or other Agreement (e.g., Novation, etc.) as applicable. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

2. What is the SINGLE AWARD IDIQ or BPA CONTRACT NUMBER?

Note: In order to substantiate the IDIQ or BPA Contract number, the Offeror shall provide a scan of the award page of the IDIQ or BPA Contract Number in Volume 3 of the proposal submission.

3. What is the TYPE OF SINGLE-AWARD VEHICLE? (Check only one):

|_| INDEFINITE DELIVERY, INDEFINITE QUANTITY (FAR 16.501-1)

|_| BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (FAR 8.405-3 or FAR 13.303)

4. How many TASK ORDERS under the SINGLE-AWARD IDIQ or BPA are submitted in order to meet the minimum requirements and to maximize the total number of additional points? Note: The Offeror need only to provide the Task Orders that meet the minimum requirements and maximizes the total number of additional points, if any.

5. What are all the TASK ORDER CONTRACT NUMBERS submitted under the SINGLE-AWARD IDIQ or BPA? Note: If there are more than 6 Task Orders submitted, modify the table below and append them all to it. If there are less than 6 Task Orders submitted, only fill out each Task Order number submitted. The Offeror shall provide award forms of Task Orders to substantiate the Task Order numbers in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

6. Provide a PRIMARY Reference: (Person who can verify all the Single-Award IDIQ or BPA data, including all the Task Order award data such as a Government Contracting Officer, Program/Project Manager, or Contracting Officer Representative) Note: If any Individual Task Order has a different Primary or Alternate Reference, fill out Question #7 below, otherwise leave blank)

7. Provide a PRIMARY Reference for each Individual Task Order provided, if necessary. Note: Only if any of the Task Orders have a different Reference than the person identified above, identify the References separately below for each Task Order provided. (Person who can verify the individual Task Order award data such as a Government Contracting Officer, Program/Project Manager, or Contracting Officer Representative) Please modify the table below, if necessary, for each additional Individual Task Order)

Task Order 1, if necessary:

Task Order 2, if necessary:

Task Order 3, if necessary (for as many additional Task Orders, repeat as follows)

8. Does the SINGLE-AWARD IDIQ or BPA project meet the minimum PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE requirement (Ongoing or Completed)?

|_| No

If Yes, what is/was the total PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, including options if any, of the SINGLE-AWARD IDIQ or BPA?

Note: The Offeror shall provide an excerpt(s) from verifiable Contractual documentation to substantiate the period of performance in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

9. Does the Collection of Task Orders under a single project meet the minimum requirement of PERFORMING/INTEGRATING AT LEAST 3 CORE DISCIPLINES?

|_| Yes

|_| No

11. Does the Collection of Task Orders meet the minimum requirement for the ANNUAL PROJECT VALUE OF AT LEAST $150,000 PER YEAR?

|_| Yes

Note: The Offeror shall provide excerpt(s) from verifiable documentation to substantiate the Annual Project Value in Volume 3 of the proposal submission. Highlight this information in the scanned document(s).

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PROJECT 5 ALTERNATE – SCORING RELATED INFORMATION

Project 5A only applies to a “Collection of Task Orders” as defined in Section L.5.3.1.

1. Was the SINGLE-AWARD IDIQ or BPA solicited under or reported under a NAICS or PSC CODE that correlates to any the NAICS Code or PSC Code in the Table under Section L.5.3.2.1.?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, what was the Predominant NAICS or PSC CODE that this IDIQ or BPA was solicited under or reported under in FPDS-NG or other documentation? (Provide only one)

Note: Offeror shall provide the FPDS-NG report, if…