Grant_Writing_Services_Evaluation_Form.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CDBG Grant Writing and Administration RFP
- Solicitation number
- PE-60350-NONST-2026-000000012
- Issued by
- Bacon County, Georgia
About this file
This is a Project Qualification Evaluation Form for Grant Writing Services issued by a City in Georgia for 2026 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application and Administration Services. The city is soliciting proposals from qualified firms to provide grant writing and administration support for its CDBG application process. The scope of work includes preparing the 2026 CDBG application, managing post-award administration, conducting public hearings and community engagement activities, and ensuring compliance with all applicable federal and state regulations. The application deadline is April 2026, and selected firms must be capable of meeting strict project deadlines while managing multiple concurrent grant applications. Firms are required to attend all mandatory public hearings and city council meetings throughout the engagement period.
The evaluation is structured on a 200-point maximum scale with a minimum qualifying score of 140 points (70%). Eight primary evaluation criteria are weighted equally at 25 points each, covering grant writing experience and success rates, knowledge of federal and state requirements including CDBG regulations and Davis-Bacon wage requirements, project management capabilities, staff qualifications, local knowledge and community engagement, technical writing and documentation, post-award administration services, and cost-effectiveness. Additional pass/fail requirements include professional liability insurance, experience with Georgia Environmental Finance Authority applications, three references from similar Georgia municipalities, registration in SAM.gov, equal opportunity compliance documentation, and verification of no outstanding audit findings or debarments. The evaluation form includes sections for reviewer information, reference verification from three municipalities, and a final recommendation with options to recommend for selection, recommend with reservations, or not recommend.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| U City_of_Alma_RFP_Grant_Writing_Admin_Servic.docx | DOCX document | |
| Cancellation Letter CDBG.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
City of __________ – 2026 CDBG Project Qualification Evaluation Form for Grant Writing Services
Project Owner: City of __________, Georgia Project Title: 2026 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application and Administration Services Firm Name: ___________________________________________ Firm Address: ___________________________________________ Primary Contact: ___________________________________________ Phone Number: ___________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________
Evaluation Instructions Please evaluate each firm based on the criteria below using the following scoring scale:
| Rating Scale |
| Poor |
(0-5 points) Fair (6-10 points) Good (11-15 points)
| Excellent |
| 16-20 points |
| Superior |
| 21-25 points |
| Maximum Score |
| 200 points |
| Minimum Qualifying Score |
| 140 points (70%) |
Selection Criteria and Scoring
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Max Points |
| Score |
1. Grant Writing Experience and Success Rate/ Experience with Firm
• Track record with CDBG applications/Experience with Firm
• Success rate (% of grants awarded)
• Total dollar amount secured
• Experience with Georgia DCA programs
| 25 |
| _____ |
2. Knowledge of Federal/State Requirements
• Familiarity with CDBG regulations
• Understanding of environmental review processes
• Experience with Davis-Bacon wage requirements
• Knowledge of Section 3 and Fair Housing requirements
| 25 |
| _____ |
3. Project Management Capabilities
• Ability to meet strict deadlines
• Project tracking and reporting systems
• Communication protocols and responsiveness
• Experience managing multiple grant applications simultaneously
| 25 |
| _____ |
4. Staff Qualifications and Expertise
• Certified Grant Writer credentials
• Years of relevant experience
• Training in federal grant management
• References from similar municipalities
| 25 |
| _____ |
5. Local Knowledge and Community Engagement
• Familiarity with the community needs
• Experience conducting public hearings
• Ability to gather community input
• Understanding of regional economic conditions
| 25 |
| _____ |
6. Technical Writing and Documentation
• Quality of writing samples provided
• Ability to present complex data clearly
• Experience with demographic and statistical analysis
• Proficiency in preparing maps and exhibits
| 25 |
| _____ |
7. Post-Award Administration Services
• Experience with grant administration
• Quarterly reporting capabilities
• Compliance monitoring expertise
• Closeout procedures knowledge
| 25 |
| _____ |
8. Cost-Effectiveness and Value
• Competitive fee structure
• Clear breakdown of costs
• Value-added services included
• Payment terms and flexibility
| 25 |
| _____ |
| TOTAL SCORE |
| 200 |
| _____ |
Additional Evaluation Factors (Pass/Fail) ☐ Firm carries Professional Liability/Errors & Omissions Insurance (minimum M coverage) ☐ Firm can meet application deadline of April 2026 ☐ Firm has no conflicts of interest with current city projects ☐ Firm agrees to attend all required public hearings and council meetings ☐ Firm has experience with Georgia Environmental Finance Authority (GEFA) applications ☐ Firm can provide at least 3 references from similar Georgia municipalities ☐ Firm has no outstanding audit findings or debarments
Equal Opportunity Compliance ☐ Firm has submitted current Equal Opportunity Policy in accordance with Georgia Code § 19-11-104.
☐ Firm agrees to comply with all applicable federal and state nondiscrimination laws, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 3 of the HUD Act of 1968.
☐ Firm maintains a Drug-Free Workplace Policy in compliance with federal requirements.
☐ Firm is registered in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov).
Reference Verification
| Reference |
| Municipality/Organization |
| Grant Type/Amount |
| Contact Info |
| 1. |
| _________________ |
| _________________ |
| _________________ |
| 2. |
| _________________ |
| _________________ |
| _________________ |
| 3. |
| _________________ |
| _________________ |
| _________________ |
Reviewer Information Reviewer Name: ___________________________________________ Title: ___________________________________________ Date of Review: ____ / ____ / ______ Signature: ___________________________________________
Recommendation ☐ Recommend for Selection ☐ Recommend with Reservations (explain below) ☐ Do Not Recommend
Comments and Additional Notes:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .