Full MDNR_Clear Lake State Park A B_ACM LCP Survey Report_2023_0116 (R).pdf

PRE-DEMOLITION ASBESTOS AND LIMITED LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SURVEY

CLEAR LAKE STATE PARK

TOILET AND SHOWER BUILDINGS A (WEST) & B (EAST)

20500 M-33 Atlanta, MI 49709

Project #188BS22765

PREPARED FOR:

Michigan Department of Natural Resources

PREPARED BY:

Atlas Technical Consultants LLC 46555 Humboldt Drive, Suite 100 Novi, Michigan 48377 January 16, 2023

Page | 1

46555 Humboldt Drive, Suite 100 Novi, Michigan 48377

(248) 669-5147 | oneatlas.com

Andrew DeLodder Martin Gamble State of Michigan Asbestos Inspector Project Manager Atlas Technical Consultants LLC Atlas Technical Consultants LLC

Respectfully submitted, If you have any questions, please call us at 248.669.5140.

1987 (AHERA).

Standard (29 CFR 1926.1101), and the Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act of Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Asbestos Construction Industry inspector. The sampling was conducted in accordance with sampling criteria specified in the 8, 2022 by Industrial Hygienist, Mr. Andrew DeLodder, a State of Michigan certified asbestos The pre-demolition asbestos and lead-containing paint sampling was conducted on December and lead-containing paint (LCP) prior to planned demolition activities.

sampling was to identify and collect samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) limited lead-containing paint survey performed at the above referenced site. The purpose of this Atlas is pleased to present this report detailing the findings of the pre-demolition asbestos and

Dear Mr. Dekett:

Atlanta, MI 49709 20500 M-33 Clear Lake State Park Toilet and Shower Buildings A (West) and B (East)

Subject: Pre-Demolition Asbestos and Limited Lead-Containing Paint Survey

Atlanta, Michigan 49709 20500 M-33 North Clear Lake State Park Unit Supervisor Mr. David M Dekett

January 16, 2023

Page | i

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Pre-Demolition Asbestos Survey

2. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

2.1 General Property and Building Information

2.2 Exterior Finish Descriptions

2.3 Interior Building Descriptions

3. PRE-DEMOLITION ASBESTOS SURVEY

3.1 Homogeneous Areas

3.2 Hazard Assessment Factors

3.3 Laboratory Analytical Methodology

3.4 Sampling Results

4. LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SAMPLING

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.2 Lead-Containing Paint

6. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

TABLES

Table 3-1 ACM Sampling Results

Table 4-1 Lead-Containing Paint Sampling Results

APPENDICES

Appendix A Asbestos Laboratory Report Appendix B Lead-Containing Paint Laboratory Report

Page | 2 levels of lead greater than the laboratory reporting limits.

for analysis by Flame AAS. The results of laboratory testing indicated that all four (4) samples contained “A” and two (2) representative samples from Toilet and Shower Building “B” were collected and submitted Two (2) representative samples of paint, taken from interior and exterior areas of Toilet and Shower Building must be assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and analysis proves otherwise.

If any additional suspect materials are discovered during renovation/demolition activities, such materials indicated that none of the samples from Toilet and Shower Building “B” contained asbestos.

analysis. Of the 24 samples submitted, 43 sample layers were analyzed. The results of laboratory testing Toilet and Shower Building “B” (East), and submitted for laboratory polarized light microscopy (PLM)

Twenty-four (24) asbestos bulk samples, taken from eight (8) homogenous areas, were collected from the indicated that one (1) of the samples collected from Toilet and Shower Building “A” contain asbestos.

analysis. Of the 24 samples submitted, 34 sample layers were analyzed. The results of laboratory testing Toilet and Shower Building “A” (West), and submitted for laboratory polarized light microscopy (PLM)

Twenty-four (24) asbestos bulk samples, taken from eight (8) homogenous areas, were collected from the located in Clear Lake State Park, at 20500 M-33, Atlanta, Michigan on December 8, 2022.

containing paint survey of Toilet and Shower Building A (West) and Toilet and Shower Building B (East), Atlas representative Mr. Andrew DeLodder completed the pre-demolition asbestos and limited lead-

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page | 3

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of this project was to conduct a pre-demolition asbestos survey and limited lead containing paint survey of Toilet and Shower Buildings “A” and “B” located in Clear Lake State Park, at 20500 M-33, Atlanta, Michigan (herein referred to as “the property”).

1.2 Pre-Demolition Asbestos Survey

The scope of the pre-demolition asbestos survey included the following:

Review of existing asbestos reports for the building, if available;

Survey of the property building(s);

Identification of accessible suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs);

Collection and analysis of bulk samples of suspect friable and non-friable materials.

2. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

2.1 General Property and Building Information

General property and building information is presented in the following table:

General Property and Building Information

Date of Inspection:

Inspectors Andrew Delodder, Inspector # A48677

Property Address: 20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

Property Owner Michigan Department of Natural Resources

Building Description: Toilet and Shower Buildings “A” and “B” at Clear Lake State Park

2.2 Exterior Finish Descriptions

The exterior of the building included brick and masonry with a shingled-sloped roof.

2.3 Interior Building Descriptions

The interior finishes of the building included plastered walls and ceiling, and floor tiled floors.

3. PRE-DEMOLITION ASBESTOS SURVEY

Atlas representative Mr. Andrew DeLodder conducted the pre-demolition asbestos inspection of the Toilet and Shower buildings on December 14, 2022 and December 15, 2022. Mr. DeLodder is a State of Michigan

Certified Asbestos Inspector’s (Certification No. A48677). The building was visually inspected for the presence of building materials that are suspected to contain asbestos. Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected and placed into individual containers for transport to a National Voluntary Lab Accreditation

Program (NVLAP)-accredited laboratory for analysis. Materials typically known as non-asbestos items (i.e.

fibrous glass, foam rubber, wood, etc.) were not sampled. The asbestos inspection consisted of the following three basic procedures:

> Conducting a visual inspection of the structures;

> Identifying homogeneous areas (HAs) of suspect surfacing, thermal system insulation, and miscellaneous materials; and

> Sampling accessible, friable and non-friable suspect materials.

December 8, 2022

Page | 4

3.1 Homogeneous Areas

Prior to collecting any samples, homogenous areas (HAs) were identified. A homogeneous sampling area can be described as one or more areas of material that are similar in appearance and texture and that have the same apparent installation date, appearance and function. Actual number of samples collected from each homogeneous sampling area may vary, based on the type of material and professional opinion of the inspector.

3.2 Hazard Assessment Factors

From the list of suspect homogeneous areas, a physical assessment was performed for each material on the list. A physical assessment includes evaluating the condition, assessing the potential for disturbance, and determining the friability of each material. By definition, "friable" materials are those that can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Each material identified was further classified into one of three categories: surfacing materials, thermal systems insulation (TSI) and miscellaneous materials. Each of the three categories have specific sampling requirements, outlined below.

Surfacing Materials: Refers to spray-applied or troweled surfaces such as plaster ceilings and walls, fireproofing, textured paints, textured plasters, and spray-applied acoustical surfaces.

Thermal System Insulation: Refers to insulation used to inhibit heat gain or loss on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and various other building components.

Miscellaneous Materials: Refers to friable and non-friable products and materials that do not fit in any of the above two categories such as resilient floor covering, baseboards, mastics, adhesives, roofing material, caulking, glazing, and siding. This category also contains wallboard and ceiling tile.

All materials were assessed related to their condition in one of the three categories: good (intact), fair

(damaged) or poor (significantly damaged) per Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 763. Material with localized, significant damage was also assessed as poor.

3.3 Laboratory Analytical Methodology

Bulk samples were analysed by Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc. (ETL) using polarized-light microscopy (PLM) and dispersion staining (Method Reference: 40 CFR Part 763, Volume 47, No. 103, May

27, 1982 pg. 23376). This laboratory participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

(NVLAP #201028-0), a quality assurance program for PLM analysis, and is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as well as accreditation requirements under 15 CFR Part 25.

Copies of the laboratory analytical report and corresponding chain-of-custody forms are included in

Appendix A. Positive sample results are reported in percent asbestos by volume of the sample and the type of asbestos material within the sample. Other common non-asbestos components may also be noted on the analytical reports.

3.4 Sampling Results

Bulk samples were collected from the site building and analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM), EPA

Method 600/R-93/116.

The following table provides a summary of accessible suspect and confirmed ACMs from the Site buildings:

Page | 5

Table 3-1 ACM Sampling Results

Sample ID /Material

Location of Materials

Material Estimated Quantity

Asbestos Content

Toilet and Shower Building A (West)

1-RM-A,B,C EA-5 Roofing Material- Asphalt Shingle NA ND

2-CC-A,B,C EA-1,3 Concrete Chip- Exterior Concrete NA ND

3-EC-A,B,C EA-1,2,3

Exterior Caulk-

Gray, Painted Brown, on Wood Siding, Door/Window Frames, & Roofline

NA ND

4-BM-A,B,C EA-4

Brick Mortar-

CMU Foundation, Shower Area

NA ND

5-CC-A,B,C FS-2,4,7

Concrete Chip-

Poured Concrete Foundation Pad 945 SF PLM 3% Chrysotile

6-GM-A,B,C FS-1,3,8

8” Floor & Wall Tile-

Ceramic Tile, Grout, and Mortar

NA ND

7-CB-A,B,C FS-2 Concrete Board- Under Ceramic Tile NA ND

8-CA-A,B,C FS-2

Construction Adhesive- Remnants of Glue on the Wall, Painted White

NA ND

Toilet and Shower Building B (East)

1-RM-A,B,C EA-5 Roofing Material- Asphalt Shingle NA ND

2-CC-A,B,C EA-1,3 Concrete Chip- Exterior Concrete NA ND

3-EC-A,B,C EA-1,2,3

Exterior Caulk-

Gray, Painted Brown, on Wood Siding, Door/Window Frames, & Roofline

NA ND

4-BM-A,B,C EA-4

Brick Mortar-

CMU Foundation, Shower Area

NA ND

5-CC-A,B,C FS-2,4,7

Concrete Chip-

Poured Concrete Foundation Pad

NA ND

6-GM-A,B,C FS-1,3,8

8” Floor & Wall Tile-

Ceramic Tile, Grout, and Mortar

NA ND

7-CB-A,B,C FS-2 Concrete Board- Under Ceramic Tile NA ND

8-CA-A,B,C FS-2

Construction Adhesive- Remnants of Glue on the Wall, Painted White

NA ND

EA=Exterior Area FS Functional Space NA=Not Applicable ND= None Detected

In the event additional suspect material is discovered during renovation activities, this material should be treated as presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) in accordance with regulations 29 CFR

1926.1101 and 1910.1001 and other applicable state and local regulations and either sampled to confirm or nullify asbestos content or be treated as ACM and handled accordingly.

Page | 6

Sample ID Sample Location Color Lead

Content

Toilet and Shower Building A (West)

1-LBP-Brown Exterior Paint Brown 0.0033

2- LBP-White Interior Paint White 0.0020

Toilet and Shower Building B (East)

1-LBP-Brown Exterior Paint Brown 0.0100

2- LBP- White Window Paint White 0.0020

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

The results of laboratory testing during the pre-renovation asbestos survey conducted at the property indicate that the following materials sampled were found to contain asbestos:

Sample ID /Material

Location of Materials

Material Estimated Quantity

Asbestos Content

Toilet and Shower Building A

5-CC-A,B,C FS-2,4,7

Concrete Chip-

Poured Concrete Foundation Pad 945 SF PLM 3% Chrysotile

Toilet and Shower Building B

None Contain Asbestos

If any additional materials are discovered during renovation/demolition activities, such materials must be assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and analysis proves otherwise.

Table 4-1 Lead-Containing Paint Sampling Results

The following table provides a summary of the LCP sampling:

analytical report and corresponding chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix B.

3050B using Flame AAS to determine lead concentration in percent (%) by weight. Copies of the laboratory samples were analyzed using the Environmental Protection Agency's Test Method SW 846 -7420 and Accurate Analytical Testing Laboratory, 30105 Beverly Road, Romulus, Michigan for lead analysis. Bulk Four (4) paint chip samples were collected from Toilet and Shower buildings A and B, then submitted to were deemed representative of the predominant paint coatings observed.

property building on December 8, 2022. The sampling included physical sampling of paint coatings that

Atlas representative Mr. Andrew DeLodder conducted the lead-containing paint (LCP) sampling of the

4. LEAD-CONTAINING PAINT SAMPLING

Page | 7 the risk of said user.

of other users, and use or re-use of this document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs does it warrant against operations or conditions against present ACM material in locations not investigated.

implied. This report does not warrant against changes to material from future operations or conditions, nor environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions and does not contain, nor should it take the place of technical specifications for ACM removal.

This document does not contain the elements necessary for an Abatement Work plan, and this document to Atlas allowed the proper designation of homogenous materials for each building.

Atlas’s observations, and the assumption that building vintage and renovation history information presented

Atlas. Selection of sample locations and frequency of sampling were based on EPA Guidance documents, conditions that were noted during the NESHAP inspections conducted on December 8, 2022, performed by

The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report are based only on

6. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

applicable subcontractors while completing renovation activities.

control, worker protection, and waste disposal should be considered by the general contractor and (1926.1101) and EPA may become operative. Appropriate actions in terms of removal methods, emissions regulatory compliance actions. However, when these materials are disturbed, the requirements of OSHA The presence of Lead-Containing Paint (LCP) and/or Lead Based Paint (LBP) does not, in itself, trigger regulations.

quantitative analysis be performed on these waste steams to ensure compliance with EPA waste disposal construction debris must be evaluated and, on a case-by-case basis depending on this evaluation, worksites within the prior calendar year. In addition, lead-containing paint and lead-coated waste and for the specific activities denoted in 1926.62, on objective data obtained by the contractor on other, similar, coated components, evaluate potential worker exposures to airborne lead. This evaluation can be based, performing renovation, surface preparation, and other activities that impact or potentially impact the lead- The presence of lead-containing paint requires, under OSHA 1926.62 requirements, that the contractor levels of lead greater than the laboratory reporting limits.

the limited lead-containing paint sampling conducted at the property indicate that four (4) samples contained buildings, were collected and submitted for analysis by Flame AAS. The results of laboratory testing during Four (4) representative samples of paint, taken from interior and exterior areas of both the east and west

5.2 Lead-Containing Paint

APPENDIX A

ASBESTOS LABORATORY REPORT

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To:

Attention:

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Novi, Michigan 48377

Project Location: 20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

Client Project: 188BS22765

253266ETL Job:

Report Date: 12/16/2022

Robert Smith

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

1432958 Asbestos01-RM-A 12/16/2022

1432959 Asbestos01-RM-B 12/16/2022

1432960 Asbestos01-RM-C 12/16/2022

1432961 Asbestos02-CC-A 12/16/2022

1432962 Asbestos02-CC-B 12/16/2022

1432963 Asbestos02-CC-C 12/16/2022

1432964 Asbestos03-EC-A 12/16/2022

1432965 Asbestos03-EC-B 12/16/2022

1432966 Asbestos03-EC-C 12/16/2022

1432967 Asbestos04-BM-A 12/16/2022

1432968 Asbestos04-BM-B 12/16/2022

1432969 Asbestos04-BM-C 12/16/2022

1432970 Asbestos05-CC-A 12/16/2022

1432971 Asbestos05-CC-B 12/16/2022

1432972 Asbestos05-CC-C 12/16/2022

1432973 Asbestos06-GM-A 12/16/2022

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify ETL immediately. Thank you.

Bldg A; Clear Lake State Park

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

1432974 Asbestos06-GM-B 12/16/2022

1432975 Asbestos06-GM-C 12/16/2022

1432976 Asbestos07-CB-A 12/16/2022

1432977 Asbestos07-CB-B 12/16/2022

1432978 Asbestos07-CB-C 12/16/2022

1432979 Asbestos08-CA-A 12/16/2022

1432980 Asbestos08-CA-B 12/16/2022

1432981 Asbestos08-CA-C 12/16/2022

Reviewed by:

Summary

Sample Layer MasticMethod

PLM 34Emily Nowacki

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

Certificate of Analysis

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253266

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432958

01-RM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGreenRoofing Material

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432958

01-RM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBlackRoofing Material

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432959

01-RM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGreenRoofing Material

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432959

01-RM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBlackRoofing Material

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432960

01-RM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGreenRoofing Material

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432960

01-RM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBlackRoofing Material

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

Bldg A; Clear Lake State Park

Novi,Michigan 48377

Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

To : Atlas - Novi 46555

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253266

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432961

02-CC-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432962

02-CC-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432963

02-CC-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432964

03-EC-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432965

03-EC-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432966

03-EC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

Bldg A; Clear Lake State Park

Novi,Michigan 48377

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253266

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432967

04-BM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayBrick Mortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432968

04-BM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayBrick Mortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432969

04-BM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayBrick Mortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM 3% Chrysotile1432970

05-CC-A

PLM 94% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

1432971

05-CC-B

Positive Stop

Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

Layer Not Analyzed

1432972

05-CC-C

Positive Stop

Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

Layer Not Analyzed

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

Bldg A; Clear Lake State Park

Novi,Michigan 48377

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253266

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432973

06-GM-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432973

06-GM-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432973

06-GM-A

PLM 96% OtherPLM 4% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432974

06-GM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432974

06-GM-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432974

06-GM-B

PLM 96% OtherPLM 4% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

Bldg A; Clear Lake State Park

Novi,Michigan 48377

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253266

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432975

06-GM-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432975

06-GM-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432975

06-GM-C

PLM 96% OtherPLM 4% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432976

07-CB-A

PLM 96% OtherPLM 4% CelluloseGrayConcrete Board

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432976

07-CB-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseWhiteTape

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

Bldg A; Clear Lake State Park

Novi,Michigan 48377

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253266

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432977

07-CB-B

PLM 96% OtherPLM 4% CelluloseGrayConcrete Board

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432977

07-CB-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseWhiteTape

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432978

07-CB-C

PLM 96% OtherPLM 4% CelluloseGrayConcrete Board

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432978

07-CB-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseWhiteTape

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432979

08-CA-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseWhiteConstruction Adhesive

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432980

08-CA-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseWhiteConstruction Adhesive

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

Bldg A; Clear Lake State Park

Novi,Michigan 48377

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253266

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432981

08-CA-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseWhiteConstruction Adhesive

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

Lab Supervisor/Other Signatory

Dave Cousino

Analyst:

400 Point Count Results by EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM (denoted by "PC")

Item 198.1: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Bulk Samples

Item 198.6: PLM Methods for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples

EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials

EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples

A % Asbestos result of "Trace" indicates that the analyzed material was found to contain less than 1% asbestos and would not be considered an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM).

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

Bldg A; Clear Lake State Park

Novi,Michigan 48377

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600

Fax: (734) 955-6604

To:

Attention:

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Novi, Michigan 48377

Project Location:

Clear Lake State Park, Bldg B

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

Client Project: 188BS22765

253267ETL Job:

Report Date: 12/19/2022

Robert Smith

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

1432982 Asbestos01-RM-A 12/16/2022

1432983 Asbestos01-RM-B 12/16/2022

1432984 Asbestos01-RM-C 12/16/2022

1432985 Asbestos02-CC-A 12/16/2022

1432986 Asbestos02-CC-B 12/16/2022

1432987 Asbestos02-CC-C 12/16/2022

1432988 Asbestos03-EC-A 12/16/2022

1432989 Asbestos03-EC-B 12/16/2022

1432990 Asbestos03-EC-C 12/16/2022

1432991 Asbestos04-BM-A 12/16/2022

1432992 Asbestos04-BM-B 12/16/2022

1432993 Asbestos04-BM-C 12/16/2022

1432994 Asbestos05-CC-A 12/16/2022

1432995 Asbestos05-CC-B 12/16/2022

1432996 Asbestos05-CC-C 12/16/2022

1432997 Asbestos06-GM-A 12/16/2022

1432998 Asbestos06-GM-B 12/16/2022

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

Lab Sample Number Client Sample Number Sample Type Completed

1432999 Asbestos06-GM-C 12/16/2022

1433000 Asbestos07-CB-A 12/16/2022

1433001 Asbestos07-CB-B 12/19/2022

1433002 Asbestos07-CB-C 12/16/2022

1433003 Asbestos08-CA-A 12/16/2022

1433004 Asbestos08-CA-B 12/16/2022

1433005 Asbestos08-CA-C 12/16/2022

Reviewed by:

Summary

Sample Layer MasticMethod

PLM 40 3Emily Nowacki

This report is intended for use solely by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This report may not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and otherwise exempt by law from disclosure. If the reader of this information is not the intended recipient or an employee of its intended recipient, you are herewith notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Clear Lake State Park, Bldg B

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253267

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432982

01-RM-A

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseGreenRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432982

01-RM-A

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseBlackRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432982

01-RM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBlackRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432983

01-RM-B

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseGreenRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432983

01-RM-B

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseBlackRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432983

01-RM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBlackRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Clear Lake State Park, Bldg B

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253267

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432984

01-RM-C

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseGreenRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432984

01-RM-C

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseBlackRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432984

01-RM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseBlackRoofing Material-Asphalt Shingle

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432985

02-CC-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip- Exterior

Concrete Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432986

02-CC-B

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip- Exterior

Concrete Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432987

02-CC-C

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip- Exterior

Concrete Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Clear Lake State Park, Bldg B

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253267

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432988

03-EC-A

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseGrayExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432989

03-EC-B

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseGrayExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432990

03-EC-C

PLM 99% OtherPLM 1% CelluloseGrayExterior Caulk

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432991

04-BM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayBrick Mortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432992

04-BM-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayBrick Mortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432993

04-BM-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayBrick Mortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Clear Lake State Park, Bldg B

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253267

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan 48174

(734) 955-6600, Fax: (734) 955-6604

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Asbestos

12/08/2022

12/15/2022

Date Collected :

Date Received :

PLM None Detected 1432994

05-CC-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432995

05-CC-B

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432996

05-CC-C

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayConcrete Chip

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432997

06-GM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayCeramic Tile

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-1 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432997

06-GM-A

PLM 98% OtherPLM 2% CelluloseGrayGrout

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-2 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

PLM None Detected 1432997

06-GM-A

PLM 97% OtherPLM 3% CelluloseGrayMortar

Non-Fibrous

Homogenous Layer-3 Analyst: Dave Cousino

Date Analyzed : 12/16/2022

ETL, Inc. maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced without written approval by ETL, Inc. Test Method EPA 600/R-93-116 & EPA 600/M4-82/020 or NYSDOH-ELAP item 198.1 and/or 198.6 was used to analyze all samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits (i.e. detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound materials) may yield false results in certain circumstances. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. ETL, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy of the results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples. Any

PLM results below 10% should be re-analyzed using the EPA recommended Point Count method. Any material that has greater than 1% asbestos content is considered to be an Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). These materials are regulated by both OSHA and the EPA and must be treated accordingly. Results are related to only to samples that were tested. An estimate of uncertainty can be provided at the client's request.

Polarized Light Microscopy Asbestos Analysis Report

Location :

To :

Novi,Michigan 48377

Atlas - Novi

46555 Humboldt Dr. Suite 100

Clear Lake State Park, Bldg B

20500 M-33, Atlanta, MI 49709

ETL Job :

Client Project :

253267

188BS22765

Environmental Testing Laboratories, Inc.

37575 W Huron River Drive

Romulus, Michigan…