Forms_to_Return_with_Quote.pdf
PDF 116 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FOVA Building 993 HVAC Service and Repair
- Solicitation number
- 140P8324Q0072
About this file
This document is a Request for Quote (RFQ) for HVAC scheduled Maintenance and on-call repair service at the Fort Vancouver National Historic Site in Washington. The RFQ requires offerors to submit a quote for the Total Annual Price for Bi-Annual Maintenance service (Line Item 10) and the Hourly Rate for 24-hour On-Call Repair Service (Line Item 20) for the base year and each option year. Offerors must also provide information on their relevant experience with similar projects. The solicitation number is 140P8324Q0072, and the contracting agency is the Department of the Interior National Park Service Pacific West Region. Offers are due by the date specified in the RFQ, and the contract will be awarded to the offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the government, as determined by the evaluation factors listed in the RFQ.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P8324Q0072_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Statement_of_Work.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P8324Q0072.pdf | ||
| DOL_Wage_Determination.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ 140P8324Q0072 Fort Vancouver National Historic Site
Forms to Return with Quote
Contract Price Schedule
INSTRUCTIONS:
Quote a Total Annual Price for Twice Per Year (Bi-Annual) Maintenance, Line Item 10 for the Base Year and each
Option Year. Quote an Hourly Rate for Emergency Repairs, Line Item 20 for the Base Year and each Option Year.
Submit a quote for each separately.
On lump-sum-priced line items, provide the total price only. If no specific line item exists for a portion of the work in your proposal, include the costs in a related item. In case of errors in summations, the total of the corrected amounts govern. Round totals and extended prices to whole dollars. Evaluation factors and comparison method are listed in provision 52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021) on page 10 of this RFQ.
Business name: _________________________________________ Phone number: ____________________
DUNS number: _________________________________________ CAGE code: ______________________
Point of contact name: ____________________________________ E-mail: __________________________
Contract Year
Line Item 10 Bi-Annual Maintenance List the Total Annual Price for Bi-Annual
Maintenance Service according to the SOW
Line Item 20 List the Hourly Rate for 24 hour On-Call Repair Service according to the SOW
FY24
(Base Year)
FY25
(Option Year 1)
FY26
(Option Year 2)
FY27
(Option Year 3)
FY28
(Option Year 4)
RFQ 140P8324Q0072 Fort Vancouver National Historic Site
Forms to Return with Quote
Relevant Experience The purpose of this form is for the offeror to list construction projects (preferably performed during the past five (5) years) that are similar to the work described in this solicitation. The number of projects listed shall not exceed ten (10) and shall be numbered consecutively, beginning with the most recent project. Use this form to address your familiarity with the Scope of Work described in the plans and specifications and with the capability criteria described in the Request for Proposal. Include area codes with all telephone numbers. Type or print legibly.
The Government may contact the entities listed herein to obtain past performance reviews of the offeror’s team. Past performance is a measure of the degree to which the Offeror satisfied its customers in the past and complied with federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The past performance of the offeror, key personnel (if applicable), and proposed subcontractors on projects similar in scope and complexity (i.e. relevant to the current project) will be evaluated in the areas of quality, timeliness, and business relations. It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their past performance may be considered by others to be less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s past performance record.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR:
PROJECT NAME:
Project Location:
Name of Owner:
Address of Owner:
Telephone Number:
Project Value:
Dates of Construction:
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND SCOPE OF OFFEROR’S WORK
PERFORMANCE REMARKS
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .