Form_813_Construct_Apron_Lighting.pdf

156CES/EMO 156CES/CEO 787-253-5172

Project TUMR112120 – Construct Apron Lighting at MANGB

Install light fixtures above aircraft height to protect valuable AF assets and provide safe conditions in the aircraft parking apron

Install prefabricated light poles and fixtures, pole foundations and associated electrical infrastructure to provide proper luminary to the aircraft parking apron at MANGB. Proposal includes 4 light poles.

ERNESTO B. RADA, MAJ, PRANG

156 CES Operations Officer 20131227

A2.3.12

Section III Environmental Analysis Determination A2.3.12. Installing, operating, modifying, and routinely repairing and replacing utility and communications systems, data processing cable, and similar electronic equipment that use existing rights of way, easements, distribution systems, or facilities.

See reverse page for additional remarks.

MARCELLE M. FABREGAS, CIV, PRANG

Environmental Manager 20140128

Report Control Symbol

RCS:

REQUEST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

INSTRUCTIONS: Section I to be completed by Proponent; Sections II and III to be completed by Environmental Planning Function. Continue on separate sheets as necessary. Reference appropriate item number(s).

SECTION I - PROPONENT INFORMATION

1. TO (Environmental Planning Function) 2. FROM (Proponent organization and functional address symbol) 2a. TELEPHONE NO.

3. TITLE OF PROPOSED ACTION

4. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION (Identify decision to be made and need date)

5. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES (DOPAA) (Provide sufficient details for evaluation of the total action.)

6. PROPONENT APPROVAL (Name and Grade) 6a. SIGNATURE 6b. DATE

SECTION II - PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY. (Check appropriate box and describe potential environmental effects + 0 U - Including cumulative effects.) (+ = positive effect; 0 = no effect; - = adverse effect; U= unknown effect)

7. AIR INSTALLATION COMPATIBLE USE ZONE/LAND USE (Noise, accident potential, encroachment, etc.)

8. AIR QUALITY (Emissions, attainment status, state implementation plan, etc.)

9. WATER RESOURCES (Quality, quantity, source, etc.)

10. SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH (Asbestos/radiation/chemical exposure, explosives safety quantity-distance, bird/wildlife aircraft hazard, etc.)

11. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE (Use/storage/generation, solid waste, etc.)

12. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Wetlands/floodplains, threatened or endangered species, etc.)

13. CULTURAL RESOURCES (Native American burial sites, archaeological, historical, etc.)

14. GEOLOGY AND SOILS (Topography, minerals, geothermal, Installation Restoration Program, seismicity, etc.)

15. SOCIOECONOMIC (Employment/population projections, school and local fiscal impacts, etc.)

16. OTHER (Potential impacts not addressed above.)

SECTION III - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DETERMINATION

17. PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CATEX) # ; OR

PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR A CATEX; FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED.

18. REMARKS

19. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING FUNCTION CERTIFICATION 19a. SIGNATURE 19b. DATE (Name and Grade)

THIS FORM CONSOLIDATES AF FORMS 813 AND 814.

PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF BOTH FORMS ARE OBSOLETE.

PAGE 1 OF PAGE(S) AF IMT 813, 19990901, V1

Section II Preliminary Environmental Survey

8. Air Quality Air Conformity Statement- The air quality region where project is located in attainment of the Ambient Air Quality Control Standards. The proposed action will not cause or contribute to any new violation of the standard in the area, will not increase the frequency or severity of any existing violation of any standard in any area, nor it will delay timely attainment of any standard or required interim emission or other milestone in any area.

12. Biological Resources According to the Preliminary Natural Resources Management Plan for Muñiz Air National Guard Base, PR dated Spetember 2013, no know federal listed or commonwealth species are known to occur at he PRANG; however potential habitat for thereatened and endagered species may occur within the forested areas surrounding Muñiz ANGB.

13. Cultural Resources According to the Air National Guard Readiness Center (ANGRC) ICRMP for Puerto Rico Air National Guard (PRANG) dated July 2011 and Cultural Resources Survey for the Luis Muñoz Marin IAP ANGB dated November 2012, there are no archeological or cultural resources affected of the proposed action.

14. Other Other environmental impact that will occur due to the proposed activity is the luminous effect of the light fixtures.

V1

AF IMT 813, SEP 99, CONTINUATION SHEET

PAGE OF PAGE(S)