FinalEvaluationScores~33.pdf
PDF 668 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 18-IND-7548-Optical
- Solicitation number
- BD-19-1025-DOCIF-FISCI-31186
- Issued by
- Worcester County, Massachusetts
About this file
This document appears to be a summary of final evaluation scores for a state and local government contract opportunity for optical goods and services. The contract opportunity, titled "18-IND-7548-Optical", is being issued by the state of Massachusetts. The contract solicits bids from vendors to provide a range of optical products and services, with bidders being evaluated on criteria such as company experience, independent experience, financial stability, warranties, service and maintenance plans, and pricing. Fifteen bidders submitted proposals, with scores ranging from 83 to 159 points out of a possible 180 points. Bidders receiving 75 points or higher with samples, or 60 points or higher without samples, will be considered for contract award, while those receiving 90 points or higher with samples, or 85 points or higher without samples, will be prioritized for award.
The pricing terms, set asides, and funding details are not explicitly stated in the document. However, it appears that this contract opportunity is seeking to establish a panel of qualified vendors to provide optical goods and services to the state and local government agencies within Massachusetts, though the specifics of the contract term, renewal options, and pricing structure are not detailed here.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Optical Inventory.pdf | ||
| Optical Cost Sheet~2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Response Form A Optical~8.docx | DOCX document | |
| SDP~1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| OpticalRequiredForms~1.pdf | ||
| EvaluationCriteria~18.pdf | ||
| Optical Software Inventory.pdf | ||
| RFR - 18-IND-7548-Optical~1.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Criteria
Comp.
Exp.
Corr.
Ind.
Exp.
Financial Employee
Requirements Warranties
Upgrade / Upgradability
Recalls Returns Trade
In Tech
Support Training Installation
Service Maint. Plan
(if applicable)
Discounts Offered -
Special Purchase
Discounts Offered -
PPD
SDP
Buisness Reference
Samples Pricing Value Added
Total
Maximum Points Avail. 5 5 5 10 20 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 20 5 5 15 5 15 40 10 130 / 115 195 / 180
Vendor bidder 1 Capri Optics 5 5 5 n/a 20 n/a 5 5 10 5 n/a n/a n/a 5 1 2 5 7 40 10 130 bidder 2 DAC Technologies 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 20 0 1 0 5 n/a 40 0 136 bidder 3 Dynamic Labs 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 40 20 86 bidder 4 Satisloh 5 5 5 5 20 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 20 5 1 15 5 - 0 0 131 bidder 5 Shore Lens Company 5 5 5 0 0 0 5 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 15 5 0 40 0 95 bidder 6 First Vision of USA 5 0 5 - 20 - 5 5 - 5 - - - - 1 0 5 15 40 0 106 bidder 7 Optical Works 5 5 5 - 20 - 0 5 10 5 - - - 0 1 8 5 - 40 0 109 bidder 8 Coburn Technologies 5 5 5 10 20 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 20 0 5 15 5 - 20 0 150 bidder 9 DAC Technologies 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 20 0 1 0 5 n/a 40 0 136 bidder 10 Hart Specialties 5 5 5 - 20 - 5 5 - - - - - - 5 8 5 0 20 0 83 bidder 11 Ocuco 5 5 5 10 0 10 5 5 - 5 5 5 20 - 5 8 5 n/a 20 0 118 bidder 12 Walman Ultra Optics 5 5 5 8 20 0 0 5 10 5 5 5 0 5 1 0 5 0 40 10 124 bidder 13 Carl Zeiss 5 4 10 20 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 20 0 1 8 5 0 20 0 0 138 bidder 14 Carl Zeiss 5 5 8 20 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 20 5 1 1 5 - 20 0 0 135 bidder 15 Lift Optics bidder 17 A&R Optical Machinery bidder 18 MEISYSTEM INC 5 5 5 10 20 10 5 5 0 5 5 5 20 5 1 8 5 - 40 0 159
Optometry Solutions 18-IND-7548-Optical
Bidders who receive 75 points or higher in the General evaluation with samples will be considered for contract award. If Bidder was not required to submit samples they will need 60 points or higher for consideration for award.
Bidders who receive 90 points or higher in the Specific evaluation with samples will be considered for contract award. If Bidder was not required to submit samples they will need 85 points or higher for consideration for award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .