2.__IRIS_PWS_RFP_Questions_and_Answers.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA9401-17-R-0002
About this file
RFP Questions and Answers from Industry
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA9401-17-R-0002 IRIS
Questions and Answers
| # |
| Question |
| Response |
| 1 |
| PWS Paragraph 1.3 refers to an Attachment 5. Question: Should this reference be to Appendix 5? |
| Yes |
| 2 |
| PWS Paragraph 2.2.1 states that, “If necessary, during the transition period following contract award the contractor will coordinate with the incumbent and AWS to transfer the existing web hosting agreement from the incumbent to the contractor.” Questions: |
a. Does the “If necessary” mean the AWS transfer will only be required if the transition to Amazon Government Cloud reference in paragraph 2.2.2 is not complete?
b. Can the government provide the terms of the current web hosting agreement so that bidders can understand their obligation?
c. Material costs for AWS are a function of consumption and vary by number of servers, size of database, amount of network internal and external bandwidth, CPU load, etc. Given that, are the costs for AWS paid directly by the government, contractor paid and reimbursed or borne entirely by the contractor within the FFP CLIN structure?
d. If the answer to the above question is that they are borne entirely by the contractor, can the government provide detailed AWS usage information so that bidders can accurately estimate these costs?
a. As the current contract has been extended to run through 31 Aug 2017, the move of IRIS production from AWS East-West to the AF Safety Center enclave GovCloud will be complete by contract award. The incumbent utilizes a combination of AWS East-West, government equipment, and personal equipment for development. The contractor has the same choices for determining where to host development.
b. The contractor will not be responsible for the cost of production in GovCloud, as those costs will be paid internal to the AF Safety Center. If the contractor utilizes a cloud service provider for development activities, these costs may be paid through the contract.
c. Costs for IRIS production on GovCloud will be paid internal to the AF Safety Center.
d. N/A.
| 3 |
| PWS Paragraph 2.5.1 identifies general skill sets of Software Developers. However, the lengthy description runs through a full range of computer skill sets including system architecture, design, programming, system administration, database administration, technical support, technical writing and cybersecurity. Lacking detailed software design documentation in the solicitation, estimation of the mix of various required skill sets and staffing levels to support the current IRIS architecture is a task that clearly favors the incumbent. Question: Can the government provide further detail in terms of current system architecture and design (e.g., through posting of a bidder’s library) or other information to clarify the workload across the various computer skill sets? |
No additional information can be provided.
| 4 |
| PWS Paragraph 2.5.2 identifies the need for an Information and Cyber Security Director. Question: Is the government expectation that this is a single full-time position? |
The government does not anticipate this will be a full-time position as the Safety Center will be managing the ATO staffing and sustainment; the contractor will be responsible for approximately 20% of the security workload normally associated with a government IT system. The contractor shall provide and sustain documentation only for the IRIS-specific details (STIG checklists, COOP, etc.)
| 5 |
| PWS Paragraph 2.5.3 identifies the need for Flight Data Analysts (FDAs) with experience as instructors in the aircraft they are assigned (reference Attachment 5, [assume Appendix 5]). Further, Appendix 6 provides estimations for monthly data analysis for each fleet in megabytes. Question: Can the government provide average file size on a per mission basis for each fleet, so that bidders can accurately estimate workload in missions per month to be analyzed? If not, can the government provide any further insight into the number of analysts currently required, since this information would only be known to the incumbent? |
The government does not break out information on average file size per mission type per aircraft; a highly dynamic sortie captures more unique data points than a flight that is predominately at cruise, thus aircraft flight data sizes can vary even within a fleet. Ultimately, the number of analysts needed may depend on the analysis software tool utilized, as different software products may take more or less human interaction during the analysis process.
The PWS Appendix 5 lists the projected number of aircraft per fleet per year that would be providing data for analysis, and Appendix 6 lists the average amount of data processed per fleet per month as of Feb 2016. In 2016 the average number of sorties per month was:
KC-135: 3,460
C-5M: 388 C-17A: 4,042 C-32A: 57 C-37A: 131 C-40: 181 C-130J: 3,210
RC-135: 150
HH-60G: 1,081
B-1B: 274 T-6A: 10,691 F-16 and MQ-9: unavailable
| 6 |
| PWS Paragraph 2.5.3 describes the MAJCOM program manager position requirements. Question: Does the government expect a single full-time MAJCOM PM to be permanently located at each of the five MAJCOM HQ locations? Also, does MAJCOM PM workload allow these personnel to also perform some amount of FDA tasking? |
Yes/Yes
| 7 |
| PWS Paragraph 3.5, Monthly Status Report, indicates that, “The status report shall also identify funds and hours expended and remaining both numerically and graphically throughout the life of the contract.” Question: Does this only apply to the X004 Travel/Training CLINs? If not, what is the purpose of this reporting requirement for the FFP CLINs X002? |
Line deleted.
| 8 |
| PWS Paragraph 3.8, Work Location, indicates that work may be performed at both contractor- identified and Government facilities. Question: Given the web-based nature of this service, is there a minimum amount of contractor presence the government expects at AFSEC, the MAJCOM HQs or any other government facilities? |
USG expects a permanent on-site presence sufficient to support proactive safety programs at MAJCOM lead commands (AETC, ACC, AFSOC, AFGSC, and AMC). No on-site requirement exists for AFSEC or other government facilities at this time.
| 9 |
| PWS Paragraph 4.1.1, Analytical Services, describes the required monthly analysis and suggests contents for analysis products (CDRL A006). Question: Since these analysis products are a deliverable which is owned by the government (i.e., not proprietary to the incumbent contractor) can the government provide an example of the outputs of this analysis process for the purposes of workload estimation? |
Sample analysis products are available; see instructions in the FedBizOps posting.
| 10 |
| PWS Paragraph 4.1.5, Presentations, describes presentations that cover software analysis products, in-depth analysis of high-interest events and trends, and proposals for mitigating negative trends (CDRL A007). Question: Can the government provide an example presentation to bidders for the purposes of workload estimation? |
Sample presentation files are available; see instructions in the FedBizOps posting.
| 11 |
| PWS Paragraph 4.1.6 details a requirement for delivery of four MFOQA-derived case studies and eight papers or articles per year (CDRL A008). Question: Can the government provide an example case study and paper/article to bidders for the purposes of workload estimation? |
Sample files are available; see instructions in the FedBizOps posting.
| 12 |
| Is the current web-based system at the following URL: https://isis.usaf-mfoqa.com/index.html ? If so, would it be possible for the government to host a webinar displaying the capabilities of this or whatever portal is accessed by the system users? |
URL is https://isis.usaf-mfoqa.com, however access is permissions-based and contractors preparing proposals cannot access it. Industry day was held in order to provide information to interested parties; access to a sample of the flight data files was provided prior to Industry Day so appropriate questions could be asked in that forum. The government will not host a webinar displaying capabilities.
| 13 |
| Would the government consider providing bidders access to the current IRMS source code for the purposes of analysis and evaluation of software architecture? |
Sample software files containing source code are available; see instructions in the FedBizOps posting.
| 14 |
| PWS Paragraph 4.2.2, Legacy System Integration and Migration, lists some legacy systems the contractor must incorporate into IRIS, but uses the language, “may include but are not limited to.” Question: Can the government provide a complete list of legacy systems which the contractor will be required to incorporate into IRIS under this FFP acquisition? |
The current legacy systems integrated in IRIS are listed in the PWS (flight data flows from several, post analysis data flows to others). Other legacy systems may come into play as MFOQA is fielded on additional aircraft fleets, depending on what process the AF is using at the time to transfer the flight data files.
| 15 |
| PWS 4.2.8, Technical Documentation, indicates that the contractor must generate and sustain software requirements, security and other specification documents for IRIS (CDRL A009, A010 and A011). Question: Can the government provide system/subsystem specification documents to give bidders insight into IRMS functionality that only the incumbent currently possesses? Question: Would the government consider hosting an industry day in which bidders could get a demonstration of IRMS capabilities and functions? |
| AFSEC hosted an industry day (13-14 Apr 2016) and provided 5 sample files of IRIS data/functionality, along with one-on-one sessions to answer any questions about IRIS. |
| 16 |
| PWS Paragraph 5.1.5 indicates that “Flightscape Insight animation tools are used for MFOQA animation and analysis processes.” However, Flightscape is not on the GFE Inventory spreadsheet. Question: Is the contractor required to purchase Flightscape licenses? Question: Are Flightscape Insight animations incorporated into the 100% web-based IRMS application or are they only used by FDAs when conducting analysis? |
a. The Flightscape license is held through the AF Safety Center, and the software will be provided after contract award. The contractor is not required to purchase Flightscape licenses.
b. Flightscape Insight animations are used by FDAs on an as-desired basis when conducting analysis, and when generating animations for presentations.
| 17 |
| PWS Appendix 4, Interoperability, indicates that IRMS interoperates with ASIMIS/ADADS to obtain flight data files, COTS/GOTS flight animation systems, ASIAS, and other military and civilian data repositories. Questions: |
a. For each of these outside systems, what data is exchanged across the interface?
b. What is the contractor responsibility in maintaining interoperability with these systems?
c. Is there a requirement to deliver IRMS data to these outside systems or is the data exchange one way?
a. ASIMIS/ADADS and G081: flight data files (pre-analysis) and analyzed flight data files. DAWS: analyzed flight data files. ASIAS: At this point the AF does not transfer any data to ASIAS.
b. The contractor is responsible for the IRIS side of automatic data transfer; this includes software scripts that incorporate authentication keys for database access. With ASIMIS/ADADS this involves retrieving flight data files; for G081 it involves retrieving flight data files and pushing analyzed data files; for DAWS it is pushing analyzed data files.
c. See above, data exchange can be both ways.
| 18 |
| PWS Appendix 4, Hosting Environment, indicates that IRMS is hosted on AWS cloud computing services and states, “IRMS is implemented as an Information as a Service (IaaS) managed Cloud Service Provider (CSP) architecture layer utilizing the following AWS services,” and the list goes on to name 27 separate Amazon products. Question: Given that labor for developing and maintaining on AWS is a function of the AWS architecture, can the government provide technical detail on the AWS products such as architecture diagrams, system configuration, procedures, processes and work instructions that give bidders an understanding of the labor involved in the IaaS architecture? |
The current IRIS structure on AWS East-West utilizes these 27 Amazon products, but not all of these are available on AWS GovCloud and will be eliminated when the transition to GovCloud is complete. Ultimately, it is up to the contractor to decide to use any - or none - of these capabilities.
| 19 |
| PWS Appendix 4, Security, identifies five references to security configuration in a cloud computing environment. Question: Can the government provide materials that describe how these guidelines affect the system configuration and system procedures, processes, or work practices? Question: Are system test results available for review? |
System test results from AWS East-West are OBE, and from GovCloud are not yet available. The contractor shall implement a system in collaboration with AFSEC, and compatible with a STIG’d operating system; Ports, Protocols, and Services; MacAfee HBSS; Nessus ACAS; and Splunk SIEM. The contractor should be familiar with all the referenced security guidelines, and how they are employed in sustaining an Authority to Operate for a DoD IT system.
| 20 |
| PWS Appendix 4 makes no reference to a development environment which might be used to maintain applications and algorithms. Questions: |
a. Is there a development environment separate from the web-based IRMS software?
b. If so, is the hardware and software included in the GFE spreadsheet?
c. If not, is the contractor responsible for establishing a development environment?
a. The incumbent utilizes a combination of AWS East-West, government equipment, and personal equipment for development activities.
b. Some; the rest is on AWS or is property of the contractor.
c. The contractor is responsible for establishing and maintaining a development environment. Of note, if real flight data information (rather than notional) is used for development, the development site may be required to acquire a DoD IT ATO; as an option a development site can be established in the AFSEC GovCloud enclave.
| 21 |
| PWS Appendix 4, IRMS Software Components Table, indicates that a MATLAB compiler is used in the H/C-130J flight data download and processing. Question: Are the workstations with MATLAB licenses used directly by the IRMS system, or is there an offline process specific to this aircraft and recorder which runs in MATLAB? |
MATLAB licenses are used directly by the IRMS system.
| 22 |
| PWS Appendix 5, Paragraph 14.2 indicates that, “Acquisition of proprietary decompression software, if required, will be coordinated with the Government.” Questions: |
0. Does “coordinated” mean the government acquires and provides the software, or is this contractor responsibility?
0. What are the data rights for the decompression software?
a. If / when decompression software is needed, the contractor notifies the government, who then coordinates acquisition.
b. Data rights for decompression software depends on the restrictions applied by the specific platform manufacturer or program office.
| 23 |
| GFE Spreadsheet. There are several Dell PowerEdge and PowerVault servers listed. Question: Given the use of AWS and migration to Amazon Government Cloud, what is the role of these servers? |
The PowerEdge and PowerVault servers are listed on the “To Dispose 2016” and “To Dispose 2012” tabs and are not available for use.
| 24 |
| GFE Spreadsheet. The inventory lists 18 offsite locations with a variety of local computers and licenses. Question: Are these workstations essential to the IRMS software functions in terms of maintenance of the GOTS software? |
The offsite locations are a mixture of flight data analysts and IRMS development, maintenance, and sustainment activities. Contractors may use these computers and licenses or provide their own.
| 25 |
| GFE Spreadsheet. The inventory lists VMWare at location #13. Question: How is VMWare used within the IRMS system architecture? |
VMWare is used to run copies of RedHat and Ubuntu on development systems.
| 26 |
| Reference Attachment 1 IRIS Performance Work Statement, paragraph 2.2.2 2.2.2. In parallel, IRIS is in the process of transitioning to AWS GovCloud as part of an AFSEC effort that will host multiple AF safety information technology (IT) systems under one over-arching ATO. The Government estimates the documentation needed to complete the transition will be in place by contract award; however, the contractor is required to complete any outstanding tasks that exist at contract award in support of the transition to GovCloud. |
As the current contract has been extended to run through 31 Aug 2017, the move of IRIS production from AWS East-West to the AF Safety Center enclave GovCloud will be complete by contract award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .