IRIS_RFP_FA940117R0002_DATED_10_MARCH_2017.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

FA9401-17-R-0002 10-Mar-2017

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

505-846-5703

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

04:00 PM 10 Apr 2017

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

FA94019. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

BRIAN J. CLARK

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED ORX

SMALL BUSINESS

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

377 MSG/PZI

8500 GIBSON BLVD SE

BLDG 20202

ALBUQUERQUE NM 87117

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE F2KDAC 16. ADMINISTERED BY

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

HQ AFSC/SE - F2KDAC

KAY ARMSTRONG

9700 G AVE SE BLDG 24499

KIRTLAND AFB NM 87117

TEL: 505-853-2607 FAX:

FAX:

TEL: SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

$27,500,000

NAICS:

541511

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF65

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

FA9401-17-R-0002

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Each Phase-In

FFP

Phase-In (1 Aug 2017 to 31 Aug 2017), Firm Fixed Price on Labor, Materials &

Equipment in accordance with the Performance Work Statement paragraph 5.1

(Attachment 1).

FOB: Destination

NSN: D399-01-715-91300

NET AMT

0002 11 Months Base Period - Labor Materials

FFP

Base Period (1 Sept 2017 to 31 March 2018), Firm Fixed Price on Labor, Materials

& Equipment in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1).

0003 1 Lot Base Period - CDRLS/Deliverables

FFP

Base Period (1 Sept 2017 to 31 March 2018); The Contractor shall furnish Contract

Data Requirements List (CDRL) DD Form 1423-1 and as identified in the PWS.

Not Seperately Priced (NSP).

0004 1 Lot Base Period - Travel/Training

FFP

Base Period (1 Sept 2017 to 31 March 2018); NTE $128,544 Travel and Training in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1). All travel shall shall be in accordance with the Air Force Joint Travel Regulations and be approved through the Air Force Safety Center assigned ISIS Program Manager or

Contracting Officer Representative (COR) and finalized by the Contracting Officer before execution.

1002 12 Months OPTION Option I - Labor Materials

FFP

Base Period (1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019), Firm Fixed Price on Labor, Materials & Equipment in accordance with the Performance Work Statement

(Attachment 1).

1003 1 Lot OPTION Option I - CDRLS/Deliverables

FFP

Base Period (1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019); The Contractor shall furnish

Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) DD Form 1423-1 and as identified in the PWS. Not Seperately Priced (NSP).

1004 1 Lot OPTION Option I - Travel/Training

FFP

Base Period (1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019); NTE $128,544 Travel and Training in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1). All travel shall shall be in accordance with the Air Force Joint Travel Regulations and be approved through the Air Force Safety Center assigned ISIS Program Manager or

Contracting Officer Representative (COR) and finalized by the Contracting Officer before execution.

2002 12 Months OPTION Option II - Labor Materials

FFP

Option II (1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020), Firm Fixed Price on Labor, Materials

& Equipment in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1).

2003 1 Lot OPTION Option II - CDRLS/Deliverables

FFP

Option II (1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020); The Contractor shall furnish Contract

Data Requirements List (CDRL) DD Form 1423-1 and as identified in the PWS.

Not Seperately Priced (NSP).

2004 1 Lot OPTION Option II - Travel/Training

FFP

Option II (1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020); NTE $128,544 Travel and Training in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1). All travel shall shall be in accordance with the Air Force Joint Travel Regulations and be approved through the Air Force Safety Center assigned ISIS Program Manager or

Contracting Officer Representative (COR) and finalized by the Contracting Officer before execution.

3002 12 Months OPTION Option III - Labor Materials

FFP

Option III (1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021), Firm Fixed Price on Labor, Materials

& Equipment in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1).

3003 1 Lot OPTION Option III - CDRLS/Deliverables

FFP

Option III (1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021); The Contractor shall furnish Contract

Data Requirements List (CDRL) DD Form 1423-1 and as identified in the PWS.

Not Seperately Priced (NSP).

3004 1 Lot OPTION Option III - Travel/Training

FFP

Option III (1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021); NTE $128,544 Travel and Training in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1). All travel shall shall be in accordance with the Air Force Joint Travel Regulations and be approved through the Air Force Safety Center assigned ISIS Program Manager or

Contracting Officer Representative (COR) and finalized by the Contracting Officer before execution.

4002 12 Months OPTION Option IV - Labor Materials

FFP

Option IV (1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022), Firm Fixed Price on Labor, Materials

& Equipment in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1).

4003 1 Lot OPTION Option IV - CDRLS/Deliverables

FFP

Option IV (1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022); The Contractor shall furnish Contract

Data Requirements List (CDRL) DD Form 1423-1 and as identified in the PWS.

Not Seperately Priced (NSP).

4004 1 Lot OPTION Option IV - Travel/Training

FFP

Option IV (1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022); NTE $128,544 Travel and Training in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1). All travel shall shall be in accordance with the Air Force Joint Travel Regulations and be approved through the Air Force Safety Center assigned ISIS Program Manager or

Contracting Officer Representative (COR) and finalized by the Contracting Officer before execution.

5001 1 Lot OPTION Phase Out

FFP

Shipping of Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) in accordance with the

Performance Work Statement paragraph 5.2.2.4 (Attachment 1). This CLIN can be executed upon need of the government at any point during the performance of the contract to include the 6-month transition period.

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

0002 Destination Government Destination Government

0003 Destination Government Destination Government

0004 Destination Government Destination Government

1002 Destination Government Destination Government

1003 Destination Government Destination Government

1004 Destination Government Destination Government

2002 Destination Government Destination Government

2003 Destination Government Destination Government

2004 Destination Government Destination Government

3002 Destination Government Destination Government

3003 Destination Government Destination Government

3004 Destination Government Destination Government

4002 Destination Government Destination Government

4003 Destination Government Destination Government

4004 Destination Government Destination Government

5001 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 POP 01-AUG-2017 TO

31-AUG-2017

N/A HQ AFSC/SE - F2KDAC

KAY ARMSTRONG

9700 G AVE SE BLDG 24499

KIRTLAND AFB NM 87117

505-853-2607

F2KDAC

0002 POP 01-SEP-2017 TO

31-MAR-2018

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0003 POP 01-SEP-2017 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0004 POP 01-SEP-2017 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1002 POP 01-APR-2018 TO

31-MAR-2019

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1003 POP 01-APR-2018 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1004 POP 01-APR-2018 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2002 POP 01-APR-2019 TO

31-MAR-2020

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2003 POP 01-APR-2019 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2004 POP 01-APR-2019 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3002 POP 01-APR-2020 TO

31-MAR-2021

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3003 POP 01-APR-2020 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3004 POP 01-APR-2020 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4002 POP 01-APR-2021 TO

31-MAR-2022

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4003 POP 01-APR-2021 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4004 POP 01-APR-2021 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

5001 POP 01-AUG-2017 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013

52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984

52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To

Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal

Transactions

OCT 2010

52.203-16 Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest DEC 2011

52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2016

52.204-7 Alt I System for Award Management-- Alternate I JUL 2013

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2016

52.209-5 Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters OCT 2015

52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters JUL 2013

52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items MAY 2015

52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990

52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns NOV 2016

52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan NOV 2016

52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information MAY 2011

52.223-17 Affirmative Procurement of EPA-Designated Items in Service and Construction Contracts

MAY 2008

52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997

52.232-18 Availability Of Funds APR 1984

52.232-22 Limitation Of Funds APR 1984

52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013

52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.233-2 Service Of Protest SEP 2006

52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995

52.245-1 Government Property APR 2012

52.246-4 Inspection Of Services--Fixed Price AUG 1996

52.246-25 Limitation Of Liability--Services FEB 1997

252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991

252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013

252.204-7000 Disclosure Of Information OCT 2016

252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992

252.204-7004 Alt A System for Award Management Alternate A FEB 2014

252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber

Incident Reporting

OCT 2016

252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991

252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By

The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of

Terrorism

OCT 2015

252.223-7004 Drug Free Work Force SEP 1988

252.225-7001 Buy American And Balance Of Payments Program-- Basic

(Aug 2016)

AUG 2016

252.225-7002 Qualifying Country Sources As Subcontractors AUG 2016

252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities AUG 2016

252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013

252.227-7015 Technical Data--Commercial Items FEB 2014

252.227-7037 Validation of Restrictive Markings on Technical Data SEP 2016

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving

Reports

JUN 2012

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006

252.237-7023 Continuation of Essential Contractor Services OCT 2010

252.239-7000 Protection Against Compromising Emanations JUN 2004

252.239-7001 Information Assurance Contractor Training and Certification JAN 2008

252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991

252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012

252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JUN 2013

252.245-7001 Tagging, Labeling, and Marking of Government-Furnished

Property

APR 2012

252.245-7002 Reporting Loss of Government Property APR 2012

252.245-7003 Contractor Property Management System Administration APR 2012

252.245-7004 Reporting, Reutilization, and Disposal SEP 2016

252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea APR 2014

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-9 PERSONAL IDENTITY VERIFICATION OF CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL (JAN 2011)

(a) The Contractor shall comply with agency personal identity verification procedures identified in the contract that implement Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 (HSPD-12), Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance M-05-24, and Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS PUB) Number 201.

(b) The Contractor shall account for all forms of Government-provided identification issued to the Contractor employees in connection with performance under this contract. The Contractor shall return such identification to the issuing agency at the earliest of any of the following, unless otherwise determined by the Government:

(1) When no longer needed for contract performance.

(2) Upon completion of the Contractor employee's employment.

(3) Upon contract completion or termination.

(c) The Contracting Officer may delay final payment under a contract if the Contractor fails to comply with these requirements.

(d) The Contractor shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (d), in all subcontracts when the subcontractor`s employees are required to have routine physical access to a Federally-controlled facility and/or routine access to a Federally-controlled information system. It shall be the responsibility of the prime Contractor to return such identification to the issuing agency in accordance with the terms set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Contracting Officer.

(End of Clause)

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2016)

SEE ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 – ATTACHMENT 2

(a) North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and small business size standard. The NAICS code and small business size standard for this acquisition appear in Block 10 of the solicitation cover sheet (SF

1449). However, the small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, but which proposes to furnish an item which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b) Submission of offers. Submit signed and dated offers to the office specified in this solicitation at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Offers may be submitted on the SF 1449, letterhead stationery, or as otherwise specified in the solicitation. As a minimum, offers must show--

(1) The solicitation number;

(2) The time specified in the solicitation for receipt of offers;

(3) The name, address, and telephone number of the offeror;

(4) A technical description of the items being offered in sufficient detail to evaluate compliance with the requirements in the solicitation. This may include product literature, or other documents, if necessary;

(5) Terms of any express warranty;

(6) Price and any discount terms;

(7) "Remit to" address, if different than mailing address;

(8) A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR 52.212-3 (see FAR 52.212-3(b) for those representations and certifications that the offeror shall complete electronically);

(9) Acknowledgment of Solicitation Amendments;

(10) Past performance information, when included as an evaluation factor, to include recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar items and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers and other relevant information); and

(11) If the offer is not submitted on the SF 1449, include a statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration.

(c) Period for acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 30 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an addendum to the solicitation.

(d) Product samples. When required by the solicitation, product samples shall be submitted at or prior to the time specified for receipt of offers. Unless otherwise specified in this solicitation, these samples shall be submitted at no expense to the Government, and returned at the sender's request and expense, unless they are destroyed during preaward testing.

(e) Multiple offers. Offerors are encouraged to submit multiple offers presenting alternative terms and conditions or commercial items for satisfying the requirements of this solicitation. Each offer submitted will be evaluated separately.

(f) Late submissions, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers:

(1) Offerors are responsible for submitting offers, and any modifications, revisions, or withdrawals, so as to reach the Government office designated in the solicitation by the time specified in the solicitation. If no time is specified in the solicitation, the time for receipt is 4:30 p.m., local time, for the designated Government office on the date that offers or revisions are due.

(2)(i) Any offer, modification, revision, or withdrawal of an offer received at the Government office designated in the solicitation after the exact time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and will not be considered unless it is received before award is made, the Contracting Officer determines that accepting the late offer would not unduly delay the acquisition; and--

(A) If it was transmitted through an electronic commerce method authorized by the solicitation, it was received at the initial point of entry to the Government infrastructure not later than 5:00 p.m. one working day prior to the date specified for receipt of offers; or

(B) There is acceptable evidence to establish that it was received at the Government installation designated for receipt of offers and was under the Government's control prior to the time set for receipt of offers; or

(C) If this solicitation is a request for proposals, it was the only proposal received.

(ii) However, a late modification of an otherwise successful offer, that makes its terms more favorable to the

Government, will be considered at any time it is received and may be accepted.

(3) Acceptable evidence to establish the time of receipt at the Government installation includes the time/date stamp of that installation on the offer wrapper, other documentary evidence of receipt maintained by the installation, or oral testimony or statements of Government personnel.

(4) If an emergency or unanticipated event interrupts normal Government processes so that offers cannot be received at the Government office designated for receipt of offers by the exact time specified in the solicitation, and urgent

Government requirements preclude amendment of the solicitation or other notice of an extension of the closing date, the time specified for receipt of offers will be deemed to be extended to the same time of day specified in the solicitation on the first work day on which normal Government processes resume.

(5) Offers may be withdrawn by written notice received at any time before the exact time set for receipt of offers.

Oral offers in response to oral solicitations may be withdrawn orally. If the solicitation authorizes facsimile offers, offers may be withdrawn via facsimile received at any time before the exact time set for receipt of offers, subject to the conditions specified in the solicitation concerning facsimile offers. An offer may be withdrawn in person by an offeror or its authorized representative if, before the exact time set for receipt of offers, the identity of the person requesting withdrawal is established and the person signs a receipt for the offer.

(g) Contract award (not applicable to Invitation for Bids). The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror's initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest offer; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.

(h) Multiple awards. The Government may accept any item or group of items of an offer, unless the offeror qualifies the offer by specific limitations. Unless otherwise provided in the Schedule, offers may not be submitted for quantities less than those specified. The Government reserves the right to make an award on any item for a quantity less than the quantity offered, at the unit prices offered, unless the offeror specifies otherwise in the offer.

(i) Availability of requirements documents cited in the solicitation. (1)(i) The GSA Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, FPMR Part 101-29, and copies of specifications, standards, and commercial item descriptions cited in this solicitation may be obtained for a fee by submitting a request to--GSA

Federal Supply Service Specifications Section, Suite 8100, 470 East L'Enfant Plaza, SW, Washington, DC

20407, Telephone (202) 619-8925, Facsimile (202) 619-8978.

(ii) If the General Services Administration, Department of Agriculture, or Department of Veterans Affairs issued this solicitation, a single copy of specifications, standards, and commercial item descriptions cited in this solicitation may be obtained free of charge by submitting a request to the addressee in paragraph (i)(1)(i) of this provision.

Additional copies will be issued for a fee.

(2) Most unclassified Defense specifications and standards may be downloaded from the following ASSIST websites:

(i) ASSIST (https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/).

(ii) Quick Search (http://quicksearch.dla.mil/).

(iii) ASSISTdocs.com (http://assistdocs.com).

(3) Documents not available from ASSIST may be ordered from the Department of Defense Single Stock Point

(DoDSSP) by--

(i) Using the ASSIST Shopping Wizard (https://assist.dla.mil/wizard/index.cfm);

(ii) Phoning the DoDSSP Customer Service Desk (215) 697-2179, Mon-Fri, 0730 to 1600 EST; or

(iii) Ordering from DoDSSP, Building 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, Telephone

(215) 697-2667/2179, Facsimile (215) 697-1462.

(4) Nongovernment (voluntary) standards must be obtained from the organization responsible for their preparation, publication, or maintenance.

(j) Unique entity identifier. (Applies to all offers exceeding $3,500, and offers of $3,500 or less if the solicitation requires the Contractor to be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database.) The Offeror shall enter, in the block with its name and address on the cover page of its offer, the annotation ``Unique Entity Identifier'' followed by the unique entity identifier that identifies the Offeror's name and address. The Offeror also shall enter its Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) indicator, if applicable. The EFT indicator is a four-character suffix to the unique entity identifier. The suffix is assigned at the discretion of the Offeror to establish additional SAM records for identifying alternative EFT accounts (see subpart 32.11) for the same entity. If the Offeror does not have a unique entity identifier, it should contact the entity designated at www.sam.gov for unique entity identifier establishment directly to obtain one. The Offeror should indicate that it is an offeror for a Government contract when contacting the entity designated at www.sam.gov for establishing the unique entity identifier.

(k) System for Award Management. Unless exempted by an addendum to this solicitation, by submission of an offer, the offeror acknowledges the requirement that a prospective awardee shall be registered in the SAM database prior to award, during performance and through final payment of any contract resulting from this solicitation. If the Offeror does not become registered in the SAM database in the time prescribed by the Contracting

Officer, the Contracting Officer will proceed to award to the next otherwise successful registered Offeror. Offerors may obtain information on registration and annual confirmation requirements via the SAM database accessed through https://www.acquisition.gov.

(l) Debriefing. If a post-award debriefing is given to requesting offerors, the Government shall disclose the following information, if applicable:

(1) The agency's evaluation of the significant weak or deficient factors in the debriefed offeror's offer.

(2) The overall evaluated cost or price and technical rating of the successful and the debriefed offeror and past performance information on the debriefed offeror.

https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/ http://quicksearch.dla.mil/ http://assistdocs.com/ https://assist.dla.mil/wizard/index.cfm http://www.sam.gov/ http://www.sam.gov/ https://www.acquisition.gov/

(3) The overall ranking of all offerors, when any ranking was developed by the agency during source selection.

(4) A summary of the rationale for award;

(5) For acquisitions of commercial items, the make and model of the item to be delivered by the successful offeror.

(6) Reasonable responses to relevant questions posed by the debriefed offeror as to whether source-selection procedures set forth in the solicitation, applicable regulations, and other applicable authorities were followed by the agency.

(End of provision)

52.212-2 - Evaluation Factors for Award

a. Basis for Contract Award

This is a best value source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3, Source Selection, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the

Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS). These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) FARSite, http://farsite.hill.af.mil. The Government will select the best overall offer, based upon an integrated assessment of Technical/Technical Risk, Past Performance, and Price. Contract(s) may be awarded to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by 52.212-1 of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors and subfactors to represent the best value to the Government. The Government seeks to award to the offeror who gives the Air Force the greatest confidence that it will best meet, or exceed, the requirements. This may result in an award to a higher rated, higher priced offeror, where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors, and the Source Selection

Authority (SSA) reasonably determines that the technical and/or overall business approach and/or past performance of the higher price offeror outweighs the cost difference. The SSA will base the source selection decision on an integrated assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation (described below). While the Government source selection evaluation team and the SSA will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

b. Number of Contracts to be Awarded

The Government intends to award one (1) contract for the IRIS Program.

c. Discussions

If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror’s proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the Final Proposal Revision are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award. Note that all responses to ENs shall be considered as modifications to the initial proposal.

EVALUATION FACTORS

a. Evaluation Factors and Subfactors

(1) The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal: Award will be made to the offeror proposing the combination most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactors described below.

Factor 1: Technical http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/15.htm http://farsite.hill.af.mil/

Subfactor 1: Software

Subfactor 2: Sustainment and Maintenance

Subfactor 3: Total Compensation Plan for Professional Employees.

Subfactor 4: Extent of Participation of Small Business Concerns

Factor 2: Past Performance

Factor 3: Price

(2) Relative Importance of Factors and Subfactors. The relative importance of each factor and subfactor is as follows: Technical, Past Performance and Price are listed in descending order of importance with Factor 1

(Technical) being most important, Factor 2 (Past Performance) next in importance and Factor 3 (Price) is last in importance. Within the Technical Factor, the subfactors are in descending order of importance.

In accordance with FAR 15.304(e), all evaluation factors other than Price, when combined, are: significantly more important than price. An unacceptable rating in any factor or subfactor will render the proposal unawardable.

b. Technical Factor

The Technical evaluation provides for two (2) distinct but related assessments: the Technical Rating and the

Technical Risk Rating. These two (2) ratings have equal impact for the rating of each Technical subfactor and shall be rated separately.

(1) Technical Rating. The technical rating provides an assessment of the quality of the offeror’s solution for meeting the Government’s requirement. Each Technical subfactors 1 through 3 will receive one of the color ratings described in DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 2A – Technical Ratings, excerpted below. They focus on the strengths and deficiencies of the offeror's proposal. The color rating depicts how well the offeror’s proposal meets the Technical subfactor requirements. Subfactor ratings shall not be rolled up into an overall color rating for the Technical factor.

Color Rating Adjectival Rating

Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength.

Green Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable.

Technical file://///Periwinkle/SAF_AQC_ORG/AQCP/5640%20-%20AFFARS/AFAC%20Working%20Folders%20--%20PM/far/FAR15.DOC%23b15304 http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA004370-14-DPAP.pdf

Subfactor 1: Software. The contractor clearly described how the proposed flight data analysis software tool set and proposed analysts will continue current MFOQA analyses by clearly addressing all the elements of Addendum FAR

52.212-1 paragraph 4.2.3(1) and the PWS.

Subfactor 2: Sustainment and Maintenance. The contractor's written description demonstrated a clear understanding of the requirements to sustain and maintain the IRIS system as identified in Addendum FAR 52.212-1 paragraph

4.2.3(2) and the PWS.

Subfactor 3: Total Compensation Plan for Professional Employees. The offeror’s Compensation Plan for

Professional Employees as described in FAR 52.222-46, Evaluation of Compensation for Professional Employees, provides a sound management approach and understanding of the contract requirements to attract and retain competent professional service employees and thereby provide uninterrupted, high-quality work. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or subfactors.

Subfactor 4: This subfactor applies to every offeror, regardless of size-status. This Subfactor shall be rated in accordance with Table 6 below and will not receive a rating in accordance with Table 2A of this RFP.

Table 6. Small Business Rating Method

Color Rating Adjectival Rating

Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Green Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of small business objectives.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet small business objectives.

To meet the objective and to receive an acceptable rating or higher the offeror is required to commit to subcontract at least one of the small business categories identified in 52.212-1, paragraph 4.2.3(4)(1. Note that if the offeror is a small business itself it will meet the objective just by including itself in that commitment.

NOTE: The Small Business Participation Plan of an awardee who is not a small business concern shall be incorporated into the awardee’s Small Business Subcontracting Plan. The Small Business Participation Plan of an awardee who is a small business concern shall be incorporated as a separate attachment in the IRIS contract. The

Small Business Subcontracting Plans will not be assessed as part of this factor.

(2) Technical Risk Rating. Assessment of Technical Risk, which is manifested by the identification of weakness(es), considers potential for disruption of schedule, increased costs, or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, or the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

The Technical subfactors will receive one (1) of the Technical Risk ratings described in DoD Source Selection

Procedures, Table 2B – Technical Risk Ratings, excerpted below. The risk rating considers the risk associated with the technical approach in meeting the requirement. For any weakness identified, the evaluation shall address the offeror's proposed mitigation and why that mitigation approach is or is not manageable.

http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA007183-10-DPAP.pdf

c. Past Performance Factor

The Past Performance evaluation results in an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements.

(1) Ratings. The Past Performance factor will receive one (1) of the performance confidence assessments described in DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 5 – Performance Confidence Assessments, excerpted below.

Adjectival Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Adjectival Rating Description

Low Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule or degradation of performance. Normal contractor effort and normal

Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may potentially cause disruption of schedule or degradation of performance.

Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special contractor emphasis and close

Government monitoring.

Unacceptable Proposal contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(2) Evaluation Process. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract’s requirements. Performance confidence is assessed at the overall Past Performance factor level after evaluating aspects of the offeror’s recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the Technical subfactors and Price factor taking into consideration their relative order of importance stated in paragraph 2 of the Evaluation Factors. The Government may consider past performance in the aggregate in addition to on an individual contract basis. In conducting the

Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the offeror’s

Past Performance proposal volume and information obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee

Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers and Fee Determining Officials; the Defense

Contract Management Agency (DCMA), and commercial sources.

(i) Recency Assessment

An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

(ii) Relevancy Assessment

The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine how closely the products provided/services performed under those contracts relate to the Technical subfactors and

Price factor, including their relative order of importance (reference paragraph 2 of the Evaluation Factors). For each recent past performance citation reviewed, the relevance of magnitude will be assessed. Efforts by the prime offeror of at least $4M per year over a minimum 5-year period of performance are considered relevant. The SSEB will conduct and in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information and will consider information relating to the similarity of scope, magnitude, and complexities of the effort including but not limited to the technical requirements

(Software as it relates to the MFOQA GOTS currently in place, Sustainment and Maintenance, Extent of

Participation of Small Business Concerns, and program management, contract type, contract value, contract term, compliance with subcontract requirements, etc.). In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the offeror, teaming partner, or subcontractor whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated. A relevancy determination of the offeror’s past performance will be made based upon the aforementioned considerations, including joint venture partner(s) and major and critical subcontractor(s) who have relevant experience and will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement. The past performance information forms (PIFs) and information obtained from other sources will be used to establish the degree of relevancy of past performance. The Government will use the following relevancy definitions when assessing recent, relevant contracts (DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 4):

Rating Definition

VERY RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

SOMEWHAT RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfaffara.htm

NOT RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and

(3) Assigning Ratings. As a result of the relevancy and quality assessments of the recent contracts evaluated, offerors will receive an integrated performance confidence assessment rating. Although the past performance evaluation focuses on performance that is relevant to the Technical subfactors and price factor, the resulting performance confidence assessment rating is made at the factor level and represents an overall evaluation of contractor performance. Offerors without a record of recent/relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and, as a result, will receive an "Neutral Confidence" rating for the Past Performance factor.

More recent performance will have a greater impact on the Performance Confidence Assessment than less recent or relevant effort. A “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating is worth more than a “Neutral Confidence” past performance rating. Likewise, a more relevant past performance record may receive a higher confidence rating and be considered more favorably than a less relevant record of favorable performance.

d. Price Factor

(1) Price will be evaluated for reasonableness and balanced pricing. This evaluation shall include all options plus the amount calculated for option(s) under 52.217-8 addressed below.

For evaluation purposes only the option under 52.217-8 will be evaluated by dividing the total proposed price for

Option Year IV by two (2) to represent the six (6) months additional performance under the clause upon execution of 52.217-8 if needed.

(2) Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise such options.

(3) Reasonableness: The offeror’s Price proposal will be evaluated to ensure it is fair and reasonable, pursuant to

FAR 15.404. For additional information see FAR 31.201-3.

(4) Unbalanced Pricing: The Government will analyze proposals to determine whether they are unbalanced with respect to prices, and separately priced line items in accordance with FAR 15.404-1. An offer may be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale.

52.212-3 OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2016)

The Offeror shall complete only paragraph (b) of this provision if the Offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) Web site located at https://www.sam.gov/portal. If the Offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically, the Offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (s) of this provision.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision --http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/31.htm https://www.sam.gov/portal

Per Court Injunction dated 24 Oct 2016 and OMB memo dated 25 Oct 2016 do not implement the following until further direction.

“Administrative merits determination” means certain notices or findings of labor law violations issued by an enforcement agency following an investigation. An administrative merits determination may be final or be subject to appeal or further review. To determine whether a particular notice or finding is covered by this definition, it is necessary to consult section II.B. in the DOL Guidance.

“Arbitral award or decision” means an arbitrator or arbitral panel determination that a labor law violation occurred, or that enjoined or restrained a violation of labor law. It includes an award or decision that is not final or is subject to being confirmed, modified, or vacated by a court, and includes an award or decision resulting from private or confidential proceedings. To determine whether a particular award or decision is covered by this definition, it is necessary to consult section II.B. in the DOL Guidance.

“Civil judgment” means--

(1) In paragraph (h) of this provision: A judgment or finding of a civil offense by any court of competent jurisdiction.

(2) In paragraph (s) of this provision: Any judgment or order entered by any Federal or State court in which the court determined that a labor law violation occurred, or enjoined or restrained a violation of labor law. It includes a judgment or order that is not final or is subject to appeal. To determine whether a particular judgment or order is covered by this definition, it is necessary to consult section II.B. in the DOL Guidance.

“DOL Guidance” means the Department of Labor (DOL) Guidance entitled: ``Guidance for Executive Order 13673, `Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces' ''. The DOL Guidance, dated August 25, 2016, can be obtained from www.dol.gov/fairpayandsafeworkplaces.

“Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) Concern” means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States and who are economically disadvantaged in accordance with 13 CFR part 127. It automatically qualifies as a women-owned small business eligible under the WOSB Program.

“Enforcement agency” means any agency granted authority to enforce the Federal labor laws. It includes the enforcement components of DOL (Wage and Hour Division, Office of Federal Contract Compliance

Programs, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, and the National Labor Relations Board. It also means a

State agency designated to administer an OSHA-approved State Plan, but only to the extent that the State agency is acting in its capacity as administrator of such plan. It does not include other Federal agencies which, in their capacity as contracting agencies, conduct investigations of potential labor law violations. The enforcement agencies associated with each labor law under E.O. 13673 are--

(1) Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (WHD) for--http://www.dol.gov/fairpayandsafeworkplaces

(i) The Fair Labor…