Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire Solar Power.doc

DOC document 64 KB Posted

Attached to
Purchase of Renewable Solar Electricity Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA9301-09-R-0026
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

About this file

Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire Solar Power

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Purchase of Renewable Solar Electricity, newest first.
File Type Posted
3.5 Solar Electrical Single Line Diagrams.pdf PDF
RFP Amendment 6 FA9301-09-R-0029-0006 Solar Power.pdf PDF
MW Solar Contractor Questions 81-91.doc DOC document
RFP Amendment 5 FA9301-09-R-0029-0005 Solar Power.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 Davis-Bacon Wage Determinations FA9301-09-R-0029-0004 Solar Power.pdf PDF
MW Solar Contractor Questions 76-80.doc DOC document
RFP Amendment 4 FA9301-09-R-0029-0004 Solar Power.pdf PDF
Corum photos.ppt PPT presentation
RFP Amendment 3 FA9301-09-R-0029-0003 Solar Power.doc DOC document
North Base Photos.ppt PPT presentation
AFRL Photos2.ppt PPT presentation
MW Solar Contractor Questions 1-76 rev 16 Nov 09.doc DOC document
Attachment 1 PWS FA9301-09-R-0029-0003 Solar Power 16 Nov 09.doc DOC document
RFP Amendment 2 FA9301-09-R-0029-0002 Solar Power.doc DOC document
Final Solar Site EBS R1 —
RFP Amendment 1 FA9301-09-R-0029-0001 Solar Power.doc DOC document
7 Oct 09 Industry Day Sign-in Sheet.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Conference Slides —
solar.pdf PDF
EAFB Design Standards.doc DOC document
RFP FA9301-09-R-0029 Solar Power.doc DOC document
Attachment 1 SOW Solar Power 28 August 09.doc DOC document
AFFTCI 32-6 Edwards AFB Wastewater Instruction.doc DOC document
Draft SOW Purchase of Renewable Solar Electricity FSPM 08-3501 REV 20090710.doc DOC document
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Solar Generated Electric Power contract at Edwards AFB, CA.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at (insert contractor phone number).

Please submit completed questionnaire to the Government Contract Specialist identified on the attached questionnaire.

Contractor Signature 1 Attachment Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Contractor’s Name: ___________________ Telephone Number:___________________

Address: _________________________ Fax Number:________________________

Point of Contact: _____________________________ Project Title and Brief Description of Work:* ________________________________________________________________________ Contract Number Provided by Offeror: _________________ Dollar Amount:_________ Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:______________________ Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent:

_____________________ Title: ___________________________ Address: _____________________

Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________

Fax Number:

Email Address: _____________________

C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO (E-mail is Preferred Method):

Aimee Buckless

Ronda Satori

95 CONS/PKB

95 CONS/PKB

aimee.buckless @edwards.af.mil ronda.satori@edwards.af.mil fax: (661) 277-8024 fax: (661) 277-8024 D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT #: _______________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Met all contract, federal, state, county, and local requirements.
2.
Correct deficiencies in timely manner.
3.
Electrical quality consistent during the life of the contract.
4.
Equipment connections produced utility grade AC power.
5.
Inverter efficiency.
6.
Utility blackout safety features.
7.
Space utilization within allotted footprint.
8.
Uninterrupted output power during hours of operation.
9.
Output power free of distortion.
10.
Output power free of over/under frequency variations.
11.
Output power free of harmonics.
12.
Output power free of over/under voltages.
13.
Output power free of overload synchronization.
14.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
15.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
16.
Was responsive to contract changes.
17.
Was the contractor ever issued a default, cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
18.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
19.
If a Government Contract, is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES/NO

Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 Attachment 2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .