PLA List of Projects MRRV.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 27 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8903-PLA-Notice
About this file
This is a market research analysis template and project list for the Air Force's evaluation of Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) on large-scale construction projects. The 772 Enterprise Sourcing Squadron (772 ESS/PKA) under the Air Force Installation Contracting Center is gathering industry feedback on the potential use of PLAs for construction projects exceeding $35 million across multiple Air Force installations. The template requests contractor input on 25 anticipated projects spanning various locations including Davis-Monthan AFB, Grand Forks AFB, Tinker AFB, Keesler AFB, Wright-Patterson AFB, Maxwell AFB, Holloman AFB, Travis AFB, Offutt AFB, Ellsworth AFB, Cape Canaveral, Altus AFB, Minot AFB, and Kirtland AFB. Projects consist primarily of design/bid/build or design/build construction work, including aircraft operations facilities, runway repairs, dormitory replacements, and MILCON facilities, with anticipated performance periods of 18-48 months.
The survey template requires contractors to provide company information, bonding capacity, potential role identification (prime, subcontractor, labor union, trade association, or other), and detailed responses regarding PLA familiarity, labor market conditions, cost impact estimates, schedule implications, and competitive effects. Respondents must answer structured questions using provided options, including cost impact assessments ranging from greater than 20% increase to greater than 20% decrease, schedule delay estimates from 1-10 days to 50+ days, and qualitative assessments regarding skilled labor shortages, comparable regional projects utilizing PLAs, workforce training benefits, and subcontractor resistance. The applicable NAICS codes are 236210 (Industrial Building Construction), 236220 (Commercial and Institutional Building Construction), 237990 (Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction), and 2371 (Utility System Construction), with company size requirements under the $45 million threshold for NAICS 236220.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| PLA List of Projects MRRV2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| PLA List of Projects MRRV2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PLA MR - Projects
| United States Air Force - 772 Enterprise Sourcing Squadron - PKA | INSTRUCTIONS TO SUBMIITED - PLEASE ONLY FILL OUT YELLOW HIGHLIGHED CELLS |
| Market Research Analysis on Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) |
| Contractor Information |
| Name |
| Company Size under - NAICS - 236220 ($45M) |
| Bonding Capacity Value - on a per project basis |
| List of Anticipated Projects | ||||||||||||||||
| Item # | Project Number | Project Descrisption | Air Force Base | Project Location | Contractor Name | Company Size under NAICS - 236220 | Bonding Capacity Value - on a per project basis | Identify your company's potential role for each project: | ||||||||
| (Prime, Subcontractor, Labor Union, Trade Asscoitation, Other) | Is your company familiar with Project Labor Agreement (PLA) and its use on construction projects? | Do you anticipate that this project will require multiple construction contractors and/or subcontractors employing workers in multiple crafts or trades? | Are you aware of a shortage of skilled labor in the region in which the construction project will be sited? | Are you aware of any comparable projects undertaken by Federal, State, municipal, or private entities in the geographic area of the proposed project that used a PLA? | Do you believe a PLA will promote long term program interests, such as training of a skilled workforce to meet future construction needs? | Would your company likely submit a proposal for the construction solicitation that requires the use of a PLA? | If solicitation requires a PLA, would your proposed construction cost likely to increase or decrease? | Based on your experience with PLAs, what is the estimated % of cost impact increase (+) / decrease ( - ) | Based on your experience with PLAs, how much additional time should the government include if a PLA is required? | Does the requirement to use of a PLA on a construction project in this geographical area restrict competition? | Do you expect subcontractor resistance should the AF require the use of a PLA on this construction project? | Comments – please utilize this to provide additional details and/or elaborate on any of the previous responses. | ||||
| ANSWER OPTIONS: | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | (Prime, Subcontractor, Labor Union, Trade Asscoitation, Other) | Yes/ No | Yes/ No | Yes/ No | Yes/ No | Yes/ No | Yes/No | Increase, |
No Change,
| Decrease | (+) 1-10%, (+) 10-15%, (+) 15-20%, (+) >20%, ( - ) 0-10%, ( - ) 10-15%, ( - ) 15-20%, ( - ) >20% | 1-10 Days, 10-20 Days, 20-30 Days, 40-50 Days, 50+ Days, No added time | Yes/ No | Yes/No | (any text) | |||
| 1 | FBNV190001 | Davis-Monthan Runway | Davis-Monthan AFB | Tucson, AZ | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 2 | No Project Number | Construct Aircraft Ops Facility for DRP | Grand Forks AFB | Grand Forks AFB, ND | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 3 | No Project Number | Air Operation Facility | Grand Forks AFB | Grand Forks AFB, ND | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 4 | WWYK140085 | AWACS PH3 | Tinker AFB | Oklahoma City, OK | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 5 | MAHG121033 | Repair Jones Hall | Keesler AFB | Biloxi, MS | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 6 | Repair Airfield Drainage and Shoulders | Eareckson AS | Shemya Island, AK | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | ||
| 7 | ZHTV110059 | Repair Primary Runway 05l-23R | Wright-Patterson AFB | Dayton, OH | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 8 | JUBJ250572 | Repair by Replacement B1410, B1411 | Maxwell AFB | Montgomery, AL | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 9 | PNQS250570 | Repair by Replacement, Dorms B697 | Maxwell AFB | Montgomery, AL | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 10 | KWRD253001 | RxR Dorms B341, B342 & B587 | Holloman AFB | Alamogordo, NM | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 11 | FTEV261001 | Repair by Replacement, Dorms B90358, B90367 | Hurlbert Field - Eglin AFB | Mary Esther, FL | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 12 | XDAT251006 | RxR Dorms B1304 & B1305 | Travis AFB | Fairfield, CA | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 13 | XDAT201039 | RxR Dorms B1308 & B1309 | Travis AFB | Fairfield, CA | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 14 | SGBP250074 | Repair by Replacement, Dorms B634, B365 | Offutt AFB | Bellevue, NE | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 15 | FXBM240540 & FXBM230541 | Rpr Dorms B3603 &B4207 | Ellsworth AFB | Box Elder, SD | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 16 | FXBM275465 | Repair by Replacement, Dorms B2204, B2305 | Ellsworth AFB | Box Elder, SD | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 17 | No Project Number | Construct Launch Support Facility, MILCON, CCSFS PROJECT, Florida | Cape Canaveral, FL | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | ||
| 18 | No Project Number | Construct Command Facility, MILCON, CCSFS PROJECT, Florida | Cape Canaveral, FL | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | ||
| 19 | No Project Number | Construct Security Forces Operations Facility, MILCON, CCSFS PROJECT, Florida | Cape Canaveral, FL | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | ||
| 20 | No Project Number | LRS Vehicle Maintenance Facility, MILCON, CCSFS PROJECT, Florida | Cape Canaveral, FL | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | ||
| 21 | Repair S Phillips Parkway Haul Route and Widen ICBM and Cape Roads, MILCON, CCSFS PROJECT, Florida | Cape Canaveral, FL | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |||
| 22 | AGGN261001 | Repair by Replacement Dorm B331 | Altus AFB | Altus, OK | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 23 | QJVF266836 | Repair by Replacement Dorm B122, B123, B130, and B131 | Minot AFB | Ward County, ND | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 24 | WWYK283007 | Repair by Replacement for 192 Beds | Tinker AFB | Oklahoma City, OK | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 | |
| 25 | MHMV230026 | Repair by Replacement Dorm B20221, B20222 | Kirtland AFB | Albuquerque, NM | 0 | 0 | $ - 0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .