FA8903OT005_MWDF_QA.pdf

Questions Government Responses

We would like to know if this is a brand new contract OR if there is (was) an incumbent performing these services.

If not brand new, could you please provide the current / previous contract number?

This is a brand new contract.

2 Are there any other documents at this time for us to review so we can prepare a submittal? No, only the posted AOI.

Qualifying Project Experience: For the Phase 1 Credentials requirement, may the three required completed projects demonstrating non-traditional construction methods be satisfied collectively through the experience of the respondent’s proposed design-build team members, including the General Contractor, Lead Design Firm, joint venture member, or specialty/non-traditional construction partner, or must all three projects have been performed by the submitting entity?

Yes, projects demonstrating non-traditional construction methods be satisfied collectively through the experience of the respondent’s proposed design-build team members, including the General Contractor, Lead Design Firm, joint venture member, or specialty/non-traditional construction partner are acceptable

Industrialized Construction Definition: For purposes of the Phase 1 Credentials requirement, please clarify what construction approaches the Government will recognize as “Industrialized Construction.” For example, will projects incorporating significant off-site prefabrication, panelized systems, modular building components, prefabricated structural or MEP assemblies, or similar manufactured construction systems satisfy this requirement?

Yes, the Government will recognize the stated examples as industrialized construction.:

Industrialized Construction is a construction approach that uses factory-engineered, standardized, and repeatable components or assemblies to reduce on-site labor and schedule risk while improving production consistency. It includes permanent modular construction, volumetric off-site fabrication, panelized/componentized systems, and pre-engineered metal buildings (PEMBs). A PEMB remains Industrialized Construction even though foundations, utilities, finishes, and final erection occur on-site.

EXAMPLES ONLY include:

1. Permanent Modular Construction (PMC): permanent building modules manufactured off-site and assembled at the project location.

2. Volumetric modular construction: substantially complete three-dimensional units—such as rooms, bays, or utility modules—fabricated off-site, transported, and connected on-site.

3. Panelized or componentized assemblies: factory-produced wall panels, roof/floor assemblies, structural frames, and mechanical/electrical/plumbing racks.

4. PEMBs: factory-engineered, standardized, repeatable structural building systems erected on-site. PEMBs are Industrialized Construction, although they differ from modular/volumetric construction because the completed building is not necessarily shipped as modules.

5. Prefabricated utility, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing assemblies: e.g., packaged central utility plants, electrical skids, restroom pods, or equipment rooms.

For statutory context, the FY 2026 law defines modular construction as a process in which components are prefabricated off-site under controlled conditions and transported to the project site for assembly.

The SAF/IE non-traditional construction menu is expressly not all-inclusive. It identifies the following options for evaluation during project development:

1. Engineered tensile facilities (ETF): Tension-fabric or similar engineered systems in place of conventional brick-and-mortar or metal-frame facilities where mission, climate, durability, and protection requirements support their use.

2. 3D-printed or additive construction: Use of additive methods for appropriate structural or nonstructural elements, site features, or facilities, subject to validation of performance, code, quality assurance, and lifecycle considerations.

3. Adjusted lifecycle planning: Design to a mission-appropriate operational life—for example, a 25-year design life rather than a legacy 50-plus-year standard—when justified by the capability need and lifecycle analysis.

4. Standardized and repeatable designs: Reuse or adaptation of proven designs rather than a bespoke, project-specific design. Department-level guidance directs consideration of maximum design reuse where site and environmental conditions permit.

5. Design to the Minimum Military Requirement (MMR): Deliver the lowest level of infrastructure or capacity needed to safely meet the operational mission, rather than adding nonessential features or excess capacity.

6. IBC and local-code-based solutions: Where appropriate, a contractor may recommend using the International Building Code (IBC) and applicable local building codes rather than strict application of Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). This is not self-executing; the cited DAF guidance identifies an AF/A4C- 2 approval/waiver requirement.

7. Innovative packaging and sequencing: The contractor may propose early procurement of long-lead material, off-site fabrication, phased/overlapped design and construction, component standardization, and other constructability-driven sequencing approaches. PDB is intended to bring contractor expertise into design early so the team can identify and resolve construction risks before field execution.)

For the requirement to provide three completed projects with a project value exceeding $4 million, does the $4 million threshold apply to the total value of each completed project, or must the portion attributable specifically to the qualifying non-traditional construction method itself exceed $4 million?

The $4 million threshold does apply to the total value of each completed project as long as the project included a non-traditonal construction method.

Please clarify whether the $4 million total project cost limitation includes both LOE 1 preconstruction/design services and LOE 2 construction, including temporary K9 facilities, design services, commissioning, permitting/fees, early procurement, and other project costs under the resulting agreement.

Total project cost = LOE 1 preconstruction/design services + LOE 2 final design/construction, including any authorized early/fast-track construction packages.

Would the Government please consider extending the current Solution Brief response deadline. Given the significance of these clarifications, additional time would allow interested respondents to incorporate the Government’s answers into their teaming, qualifying project experience, and technical approach.

The purpose of Phase 1 (Solution Brief / White Paper) is to serve as high-level market research to evaluate commercial capabilities, innovative concepts, and overall technical approach. Because Phase 1 focuses on conceptual feasibility and commercial methodologies rather than detailed, in depth technical proposals or final construction documents. Detailed project schedules (e.g., full Gantt charts) and extensive technical diagrams are not required at this stage and will be requested from shortlisted vendors selected to participate in Phase 2 (Pitch Session).

Phase 1 Submission Guidelines which is strictly limited to 5 pages calls for the respondent to provide a brief overview including at least three examples of projects using Fabric Engineered Tensile Facilities (EFT) , Industrialized Construction (IC), 3D-printed or additive construction techniques, or a combination of non-traditional methods. This appears to be in conflict with the Non-Negotiable Material Specifications, Justifications, and Approvals section which states that the project must utilize the following specialized materials and systems. The non-negotiable materials specified include reinforced masonry walls and heavy-gauge structural steel frames. Are we to provide examples of projects utilizing the non-negotiable materials specified listed on pages 4 & 5 or the non-traditional methods described on page 9?

Yes, please provide examples of projects utilizing the traditional and/or the non-traditional methods. The non-negotiable materials listed on pages 4 & 5 serves as a performance specifications in accordance with the reference or authority provided.

9 Is the cost associated with providing the secure, temporary housing location on base for the displaced K9s during construction to be included in the guaranteed maximum price of $4M?

yes, that cost should be part of the total cost.

Is the temporary housing location required to meet all of the requirements just the kennel building or are the admin, food storage, secure tack room, and other areas to be included in the temporary facility?

The temporary kennels need to meet the same standards as the main kennel facility.

Admin space and food storage won't be a problem due to the building we are moving into.

Building the temporary facility must be completed before the kennel facility gets renovated.

11 How many kennel spaces are required in the temporary housing location? There should be 8 kennels in total

Slide Number 1