Attch_3_-_Answers_to_Questions.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8903-16-B-0015
About this file
Attch 3 - Answers to Questions
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF30_-_AMD_0003.pdf | ||
| AMD_0002_-_SF30.pdf | ||
| SF30_AMD_0001.pdf | ||
| IFB_Extension_Memo_30-Sept-16.pdf | ||
| IFB_Extension_Memo_1-Sept-16.pdf | ||
| IFB_Extension_Memo.pdf | ||
| Attch_2_-_Bidder_Question_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FA8903-16-B-0015_Instructions_to_Bidders.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA8903-16-B-0015__Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attch_1_-_ITB_Bid_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| IFB_FA8903-16-B-0015_Synopsis.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions
| QUESTION # | IFB QUESTIONS | DOCUMENT REFERENCE | GOVERNMENT RESPONSE | SOW REFERENCE |
| 1 | Is a bid guarantee required? | FAR 52.228-1 | A bid guarantee is not required for this effort | |
| 2 | Are performance and payment bonds required? | FAR 52.228-15 | Performance and Payment Bonds are not required for this effort | |
| 3 | During the site visit, it was found that some of the deficiencies discussed in the SOR was repaired already. To reconfirm and for more accurate assessments of the SOR and field measurements of important items, would it be possible to allow access to the site for more detailed survey..? | General | Another site visit is not anticapated at this time. | |
| 4 | Will there be revised RFP Engineering Drawings issued that reflect some of the discrepencies and issues mentioned during the site visit. | General | There are NO revised drawings. The SOW was updated to reflect noted discrepencies/issues from the site visit. | |
| 5 | We would like to know the qualifications and the requirements; such as the bonding, past performance, Korean contractors and sub-contractors who have the General Construction License requirements to participate the bid for the project.. | General | Refer to the ITO (Instructions to Offerors) included with the RFP. | |
| 6 | Please confirm the rolling pit cover material. Is it steel or aluminum? | Bulk Storage-Facility 1305; 1.3 Deficiency KJU009 | The rolling pit cover material should be aluminum. | |
| 7 | Is this area classified as Hazardous Area Division 1? | Bulk Storage-Facility 1317; 1.9 Deficiency N-007600-05 | Yes | |
| 8 | If a grounding test is performed and is not adequate, should the contractor install a ground rod? | Bulk Storage-Facility 1317; 1.13 Deficiency KJU019 | If it is determined that the existing ground system does not have grounding rods then new ground rods should be installed. The SOW was amended to reflect this requirement. | |
| 9 | The building number has been renumbered recently. Please check the building number. | Bulk Storage-Facility 1307; 1.15 Deficiency N-037448-08 | Correct Building # is Facility 1308 - JP8 Rail Offload, Deficiency KJU014. SOW updated to notate change. | |
| 10 | Please confirm whether the two tanks are in use or not. Is the contractor being held accountable for emptying, removing sludge, and cleaning the two tanks? | Bulk Storage-Facility 712 & 713; 1.22 & 1.23 Deficiency KJU003 (1) & (2) | No both tanks have been cleaned and gas freed and are ready for demolition. | |
| 11 | The small brass valves to be replaced are located on the two tanks that are to be removed according to the SOR 1.25 & 1.26. | Bulk Storage-Facility 2136; 1.24 Deficiency N-037447-08 | The brass valves will need to be replaced as the two tanks will NOT be removed. | |
| 12 | The deficiency table in SOR includes "Design Level Required1" and the superscript 1 refers to Level A - See Paragraph 3.1.1.2; Level B - See Paragraph 3.1.1.3; Level C - See Paragraph 3.1.1.4. Please provide these paragraphs. | SOW Page 30-34 of 148 | These are extensive and are included in the complete SOW as part of the RFP. | |
| 13 | An FBO search returned no results for this project’s RFP and SOW. When does the government anticipate bid package release? | General | The Government anticipates release via FBO on or about 25 July 2016 | |
| 14 | AFCEC’s typical RFP delivery time from amendment and Q&A responses to due date for fuels proposals is 14 days. Due to this proposal being a full and open procurement with a significantly greater proposal complexity than routine task order proposals, will AFCEC provide a 30-day proposal preparation period following amendment release? | General | Yes |
&"Arial,Bold"&12Design and Repairs for Various DLA-E Fuel Facilities at Kwang Ju Air Base, Korea
FA8903-16-B-0015
&KFF0000Due Date 1 July 2016 at 0900 &12Attachment 3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .