ITO ATTACHMENT 1.2 - Blank PPQ - Word Version.docx

ITO ATTACHMENT 1.2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

H. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original Contract Cost: $

2. Current/Final Contract Cost: $

3. Reason for difference between initial contract cost and current/final contract cost, if applicable:

I. Number of FTEs

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. For each and every response which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions below, provide supporting rationale in the “Supporting Information:” section. Responses do not need to necessarily match information provided in CPARs. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL – During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some or many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.

UK UNKNOWN – Unknown Performance rating due to lack of sufficient information to assign a rating.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

1. How well did the contractor perform curriculum development?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. How well did the contractor perform cyber range support efforts?

3. How well did the contractor perform instructional delivery to students in the classroom?

4. How well did the contractor instructors maintain certification requirements for their positions?

5. How well did the contractor instructors maintain educational requirements for their positions?

6. How well did the contractor implement current quality processes standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control?

7. How well did the contractor adapt to emerging technology/methodology changes?

8. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

9. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with Government and contractor staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

10. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

11. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

12. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?

13. How well did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of subcontracted efforts?

14. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including Government Furnished Property/Material or Contractor Acquired Property)?

15. How effective was the contractor’s acquisition management (includes subcontractors and commercial hardware/software items)?

16. Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors?

17. To what degree did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

18. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

19. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

20. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

21. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

22. How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work?

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what it promised in its proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to it today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

ATTN: Melissa Mitchell, Contracting Officer and Melissa Blair, Contracting Officer Email: melissa.mitchell.7@us.af.mil and melissa.blair.2@us.af.mil