FA8773-15-R-0043_Draft_Atch_6_-_PPQ.pdf

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

Draft RFP: FA8773-15-R-0043 Attachment 6

OCO/DCO RTO&I SHELTER Project 19 Jun 15

Past Performance Questionnaire Record

Solicitation FA8773-15-R-0043 Offensive Cyber Operations (OCO) / Defensive Cyber Operations (DCO) and Real Time Operations and Innovation (RTO&I) SHELTER

VENDOR NAME:

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CONTRACT #:

1. Scale/Scope of Work (Explain, in some detail, the type of services provided by the contractor):

2. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.

3. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?

4. Performance Areas:

Please tell us if the contractor provided or performed the following services or tasks:

General Questions: YES / NO

A. Developed realistic delivery schedules, met established project schedules, and conformed to contract requirements.

B. Provided required skills with completing tasks/milestones/ deliverables within the established or set time schedules.

C. Did the contractor have difficulty employing or retaining qualified/certified personnel?

Quality of Technical Services: YES / NO

A. Demonstrated the ability to plan, design, develop, implement and manage a project.

B. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiencies for contract deliverables?

C. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. Displayed initiative and innovative approaches to solve problems.

Software Development: YES / NO

A. Performed software development tasks, including analyzing requirements and designing a functional solution based on a set of requirements:

1. Develop on various OS platforms (e.g. Windows, Unix/Linux, OS/X)

2. Develop in various programming/scripting languages.

B. Developed capabilities designed to detect advanced malicious logic.

C. Conducted agile-like software development tasks and management.

D. Developed capabilities for mobile platforms for kernel and user-level mobile software architectures.

Vulnerability Research: YES / NO

A. Performed tasks to identify vulnerabilities in support of the identification, detection, and analysis of previously known and unknown system vulnerabilities.

B. Analyzed software and hardware systems to identify vulnerabilities for the purpose of developing exploits.

C. Performed activities in support of security technologies and computer forensics support.

Reverse Engineering & Forensics: YES / NO

A. Performed reverse engineering of malicious software through detection, containment, collection, and analysis resulting in mitigation.

B. Performed tasks utilizing reverse engineering tools and fuzzers.

Network Intrusion Detection/Prevention Analysis: YES / NO

A. Developed tools to detect, analyze, and neutralize malicious logic traveling through the network.

Quality Assurance: YES / NO

A. Performed software quality assurance of a system/network or application through the software development lifecycle:

1. Perform functional evaluation on developed software.

2. Identify and report bugs and missing functionality.

3. Document test plans for products and product features.

Network and System Administration: YES / NO

A. Maintained system infrastructure and network infrastructure including backups of systems and source code for computer networks.

B. Performed software upgrades/patches, hardware installation, user administration, and implement security policies.

C. Performed administration duties to include installing, configuring, operating, maintaining, monitoring, administering, and troubleshooting:

1. Infrastructure devices to include routers, switches, load balancers, and wireless LAN devices.

2. Network and network defense technology to include firewalls, application-based firewalls, intrusion detection systems, web proxy devices and servers, and associated software devices.

5. Performance Ratings:

How well did the Contractor perform on the referenced contract. Please use the rating system below to assign a performance rating for the factors listed below. Please provide a detailed narrative to support ratings above satisfactory.

Rating Definitions:

Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the government's benefit.

Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government's benefit.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and timely recovery is not likely. Contractor's corrective actions to date have been ineffective.

Areas Rated:

(1) Quality of Service Rating:

Supporting Narrative:

(2) Schedule Rating:

(3) Cost Control: N/A

(4) Business Relations Rating:

(5) Management of Key Personnel Rating:

6. Specific Problems or Issues:

Were there any adverse performance issues/problems? If so, how were they resolved?

Reports/Letters YES / NO

Contract Discrepancy Report

Cure Notice

Show Cause Notice

Suspension of Payment

Termination for Convenience/Default

Denial of Claim

Other

Remarks:

Response by:

Print Name Title

Signature Date