Attachment_12__PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.doc

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IN

ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

INSTRUCTIONS FOR REFERENCE

You have been identified as a past performance reference for solicitation FA8750-18-R-0002 Virtualized Intelligence Platform Engineering and Research (VIPER) issued by the Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome NY. To assist the Government in evaluating the past performance of the Offeror identifying you as a reference, please complete this Past Performance Questionnaire, then return it by email to the Contracting personnel identified below. If the Offeror performed additional contracts for your organization, please provide past performance information on those contracts as well.

Andrea Falcone / Christopher Scialdone

AFRL/RIKD

26 Electronic Pkwy

Rome NY 13441-4514 andrea.falcone@us.af.mil / christopher.scialdone@us.af.mil The individual knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable. Thank you for your assistance.

1.

REFERENCE NAME:

POSITION:

ADDRESS:

TEL:

EMAIL:

2.

CONTRACT #:

PROGRAM NAME:

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION:

3.

RELATIONSHIP AND TIME INVOLVED WITH OFFEROR:

4.

WHAT, IF ANY, ELEMENTS OF WORK WERE SUBCONTRACTED? PLEASE INCLUDE AN

ESTIMATE OF THE PERCENTAGE OF WORK THAT WAS SUBCONTRACTED.

5.

RELEVANCE TO SOLICITATION:

Please rate the offeror’s performance using the scale below.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

EVALUATION AREAS

I. Technical Capability E VG S M U N

Comments:

II. Timely Performance E VG S M U N

Comments:

III. Management Effectiveness E VG S M U N

Comments:

IV. Contract Administration E VG S M U N

Comments:

V. Compliance with Security and Safety Standards E VG S M U N

Comments:

VI. Overall Performance E VG S M U N

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (attach additional sheets as necessary):

Attachment 10 28 June 2018

FA8750-18-R-0002