RFP_Questions_Ukraine_12_Mar_2019_FA87.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 18 KB Posted

Attached to
Ukraine NAVAIDS
Solicitation number
FA8730-19-R-0012
Issued by

About this file

From the source

Ukraine NAVAIDS RFP, questions and USG answers

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
48800_AMEND_004.pdf PDF
Section_M__Ukraine_Case_X7-D-4ZZ_NAVAIDS_Program_Evaluation_Factors_22_MAR_2019.docx DOCX document
48702_AMEND_002.pdf PDF
RFP_amendmend_0001_8_Mar_2019.pdf PDF
48418.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Sheet1 Question/issues log for FMS UKRAINE FA7730-19-R-0012

ItemReferenceIssueResolutiondate
1Civil worksDoes the UAF have a preferred list or qualified Civil work contractor to use?Unknown. Contractor should determine civil works local subcontractor12-Mar
2CDRLs , Block 5 contract referenceCDRLs reference PWS which is not providedsee RFP amendment 00212-Mar
3SRD 4.1requires a DME and a TACAN as part of the VORTAC system. Highly unusual. Is this a oversight or is a DME required?A DME is a normal component of a TACAN system, so VOR/DME equipped civilian aircraft will use VOR and the DME portion of the TACAN.12-Mar
4SOO Section 9Which CLIN(s) should training be included?see RFP amendment 00212-Mar
5SOO Section 3Which CLIN(s) should civil works be included?see RFP amendment 00212-Mar
6Section L 4.3.6Small Business Evaluation is included under Technical Volume. Should the Small Business Plan be included in Volume II and V?Volume V12-Mar
7Section L Enclosure 1On the RFP Cross Reference Matrix, Evaluation factors (Section M) references sections not included in Section M (2.6, 2.8)see RFP amendment 00212-Mar
8SRD 4.2Which runway approach is getting the ILS?Runway 2912-Mar
9SRD 4.2Is there another ILS to interlock with? If so, what are the interlock interfaces?No12-Mar
10Section L 5.3/ Section M 4.3.1Section L indicates contracts performed during the past 8 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation and Section M indicates performed during the past three (3). Please confirm recency requirement.see RFP amendment 00212-Mar
11SOO/ Exhibit A CDRLCDRL Number References in the SOO are not the same numbers as in Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List. Please confirm which numbers are correct.see RFP amendment 00212-Mar
12CLIN 0006 and 0007Block 16 Remarks indicate submissions shall be delivered to PCO myrka.mikhail@us.af.mil and PMO philbert.cole.l@us.af.mil. All other CLINs indicate submissions to PCO richard.axtell.2@us.af.mil and PMO timothy.finnegan.4@us.af.mil. Are the submission instructions on CLIN 0006 and 0007 correct?see RFP amendment 00212-Mar
13SOO 9.3.5The disclosure statement in this paragraph is different than the distribution statement required by Exhibit A CDRL. Will the supplemental information require both disclosure and distribution statements?yes12-Mar
14Section B CLIN 0002 paragraph DThis paragraph appears to have conflicting time lines both two (2) years and seven (7) years are listed for support without replenishmentsee RFP amendment 00212-Mar
15Section B CLIN 0003 paragraph DThis paragraph appears to have conflicting time lines both two (2) years and seven (7) years are listed for support without replenishmentsee RFP amendment 00212-Mar
16SOO Section 14Will the government be responsible for all import duties and taxescontractor will be responsible12-Mar
17Exhibit A / SOOSOO does not reference the CDRLs as indicated in Exhibit A (CDRLs A001-A004) are not in SOO.see RFP amendment 00212-Mar
18Exhibit A, SOO Sect. 9.3.5.4 & 9.3.7.1.1Conflicting Statements required for Documentation between FOUO, Disclosure Statements and Distribution Statements.see RFP amendment 00212-Mar
19Sect. A-JAre there other sections before Section K ?RFP contains Sections A-M.12-Mar

File details come from the government source that posted it.