48702_AMEND_002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

See Block #2

PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12 MAR 2019

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO.

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY AFLCMC/HBAK CODE FA8730 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND, USAF

AFLCMC/HBAK

75 VANDENBERG DRIVE, BLDG 1630

HANSCOM AFB, MA 01731-1700

LANO BALULESCU 781-225-5387

Lano.Balulescu@us.af.mil

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

FA8730-19-R-0012

X

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, X is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 0 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(X )

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: ( ) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. ITEM

10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor X is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Ukraine Navigational Aids Program. Exibit A (CDRLs) and Attachments 3 (Section L) and 4 (Section M) are updated. .

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print).

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

RICHARD L. AXTELL, JR.

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

BY________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA ConWrite Version 7.1.1.4 FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 Created 12 Mar 2019 12:31 PM

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

FA8730-19-R-0012 0002 PAGE 2 OF 6

Qty Unit Price ITEM SUPPLIES OR SERVICES Purch Unit Total Item Amount

Site Survey

0001 CLIN Change __________ Lot __________ Noun: SITE SURVEY - STAROKONSTANTYNIV AIRBASE Total Quantity: 1 Total Item Amount: $0.00

PSC: 1720

NSN: N - Not Applicable DD1423 is Exhibit: A Contract type: J - FIRM FIXED PRICE Inspection: DESTINATION Acceptance: DESTINATION

FOB: DESTINATION

Descriptive Data:

A. The Contractor shall provide all the necessary personnel, materials, equipment and services, to conduct Site Survey Visits/Inspections at Starokonstantyniv

Airbase, Ukraine in preparation for the installation of the ILS/DME, and

VORTAC. The Contractor shall provide a Site Survey Report with site specific construction drawings, a Statement of Work for the required Construction and

Site/Infrastructure improvements, in accordance with the Statement of Objectives

(SOO, Attachment 1) and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRLs, Exhibit A).

B. The Contractor shall coordinate all site survey activities with the US

Government and the Ukraine Air Force

C. Includes all cost for program management and personnel travel.

D. Planned date for the site survey is within forty-five (45) days after contract award.

E. This is a Firmed Fixed Price CLIN.

F. All documentation shall be in the English language.

G. Contractor shall be responsible for all civil works IAW the installation of procured equipment (ILS/DME and VORTAC).

H. Contractor shall provide familiarization training.

FA8730-19-R-0012 0002 PAGE 3 OF 6

ITEM SUPPLIES OR SERVICES Purch Unit Total Item Amount

ILS/DME

0002 OPTION CLIN (supply) __________ Noun: OPTION CLIN, ILS/DME STAROKONSTANTYNIV AIRBASE

PSC: 1720

NSN: N - Not Applicable DD1423 is Exhibit: A Contract type: J - FIRM FIXED PRICE Inspection: DESTINATION Acceptance: DESTINATION

FOB: DESTINATION

Descriptive Data:

A. The Contractor shall provide all necessary personnel, materials, equipment, and services to produce and deliver one (1) Category 1 ILS/DME at

Starokonstantyniv Airbase, Ukraine IAW the Statement of Objectives (SOO, Attachment 1) and the System Requirements Document (SRD, Attachment 2).

B. Includes all necessary personnel, materials, equipment, and services to conduct

Factory

Acceptance Testing (FAT) to include FAT Test Plans and Procedures and FAT

Report IAW the SOO and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRLs, Exhibit A).

C. Includes a two (2) year standard commercial warranty for the ILS/DME system, beginning immediately after successful completion of the Flight

Certification IAW the SOO.

D. Includes a quantity of organizational-level spares and spare modules/line replaceable units (LRUs) sufficient to support and sustain on-site maintenance operations of the systems without replenishment for seven (7) years under normal operating conditions; and a quantity of site/operating spare parts and consumables sufficient to support/maintain the ILS/DME equipment for seven (7) years, under normal operating conditions and without replenishment IAW the SOO.

E. Includes all necessary personnel, materials, equipment and services to produce and deliver the necessary test equipment and specialized tools required to detect and isolate system failures, and to perform organizational-level repair and preventative maintenance of the ILS/DME system IAW the SOO.

F. Includes three (3) sets (hard copy) of applicable Operation and Maintenance

Manuals, plus one (1) electronic (CD) copy for all software and equipment deliverables IAW the SOO and CDRLs.

G. Includes all costs for program management and personnel travel.

H. This is a Firm Fixed Price OPTION CLIN. The price of this option CLIN, if exercised, is $____________

I. All documentation shall be in the English language.

J. Contractor shall be responsible for alol civil works IAW the installation of procured equipment (ILS/DME and VORTAC).

K. Contractor shall provide familiarization training.

FA8730-19-R-0012 0002 PAGE 4 OF 6

ITEM SUPPLIES OR SERVICES Purch Unit Total Item Amount

VORTAC

0003 OPTION CLIN (supply) __________ Noun: OPTION CLIN, VORTAC - STROKONSTANTYNIV AIRBASE

PSC: 1720

NSN: N - Not Applicable DD1423 is Exhibit: A Contract type: J - FIRM FIXED PRICE Inspection: DESTINATION Acceptance: DESTINATION

FOB: DESTINATION

Descriptive Data:

A. The Contractor shall provide all necessary personnel, materials, equipment, and services to produce and deliver one (1) VORTAC at Starokonstantyniv

Airbase, Ukraine IAW the Statement of Objectives (SOO, Attachment 1) and the

System Requirements Document (SRD, Attachment 2).

B. Includes all necessary personnel, materials, equipment, and services to conduct

Factory

Acceptance Testing (FAT) to include FAT Test Plans and Procedures and FAT

Report IAW the SOO and Contract Data Requirements List (CDRLs, Exhibit A).

C. Includes a two (2) year standard commercial warranty for the VORTAC system, beginning immediately after successful completion of the Flight

Certification IAW the SOO.

D. Includes a quantity of organizational-level spares and spare modules/line replaceable units (LRUs) sufficient to support and sustain on-site maintenance operations of the systems without replenishment for seven (7) years under normal operating conditions; and a quantity of site/operating spare parts and consumables sufficient to support/maintain the VORTAC equipment for seven (7) years, under normal operating conditions and without replenishment IAW the SOO.

E. Includes all necessary personnel, materials, equipment and services to produce and deliver the necessary test equipment and specialized tools required to detect and isolate system failures, and to perform organizational-level repair and preventative maintenance of the VORTAC system IAW the SOO.

F. Includes three (3) sets (hard copy) of applicable Operation and Maintenance

Manuals, plus one (1) electronic (CD) copy for all software and equipment deliverables IAW the SOO and CDRLs.

G. Includes all costs for program management and personnel travel.

H. This is a Firm Fixed Price OPTION CLIN. The price of this CLIN, if exercised, is $________________

I. All documentation shall be in the English language.

FA8730-19-R-0012 0002 PAGE 5 OF 6

SHIP MARK TRANS

ITEM SUPPLIES SCHEDULE DATA QTY TO FOR PRI DATE

0001 1 U 30 MARO

Noun: SITE SURVEY - STAROKONSTANTYNIV AIRBASE

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES

DOCUMENT PGS DATE TITLE

EXHIBIT A 15 08 MAR 2019 CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRLS)

ATTACHMENT 3 25 12 MAR 2019 SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

ATTACHMENT 4 10 12 MAR 2019 SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR

AWARD

RFP # FA8730-19-R-0012

ATTACHMENT 2: INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO), SECTION L

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO RESPONDENTS FOR

PROPOSAL PREPARATION USING TRADEOFF PROCEDURES

SECTION L

Attachment 3

12 Mar 2019

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFEROR’S OR RESPONDENTS

1.0 Description

This effort is to provide for a Ukraine Navigational Aids (NAVAIDS) Program for an Instrument

Landing System/Distance Measuring Equipment (ILS/DME) and a VHF Omnidirectional Range

(VOR) beacon and a Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) system beacon for the Ukrainian Air Force

(UAF) located at Starokonstantyniv Air Base (hereafter referred to as NAVAIDS Program).

This effort includes: spares and manuals, training, security, inspection, repair and/or replacement of equipment missing or damaged. Warranty for newly purchased equipment will be included.

All systems shall be non-developmental end items and meet or exceed applicable International

Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards, and the specifications stated in The Statement of

Objedctives (SOO).

2.0 General Instructions

(a) The Offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by this ITO and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Statement of Objectives (SOO), Model Contract, including all

Exhibits and Attachments thereto, and all attachments to this ITO including supplemental instructions contained herein. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in this ITO may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

(b) The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the Offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the Offeror's proposal.

(c) Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

(d) The proposal shall be valid for a period of 270 calendar days from the required submission date. The Offeror shall make a clear statement in the proposal documentation that the proposal is valid for a period of not less than 270 calendar days from the required submission date.

(e) In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the Offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

(f) The terms Government and United States Government (USG) are used throughout the document and are meant to be used as the USG unless listed otherwise such as Government of

Ukraine.

2.1 General Information

2.1.1. Point of Contact

The Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO) Richard Axtell, e-mail: richard.axtell.2@us.af.mil and Contract Specialist, Lano Balulescu, lano.balulescu@us.af.mil are the sole points of contact for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the PCO and Contract

Specialist. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the PCO and Contract Specialist at the address located in Section A of the model contract/solicitation.

2.1.2 Proposal due Date and Time

Offerors proposals are due to the Government Contracting Officer no later than (NLT) 3:00 PM

EST, 45 calendar days from the date stamped on the cover letter to this solicitation. Proposals received by this due date / time will be considered the Offerors “official proposal”. Proposals received after this due date / time may not be evaluated by the Government, and may be eliminated from the competition. Offerors shall transmit proposals to the Government Contracting Officer as follows: One (1) hard copy of the “original“ proposal, two (2) additional proposal hard copies, and one (1) CD/DVD soft copy of the proposal, hand-carried and / or delivered by express mail to:

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC/HBAK)

Ukraine NAVAIDS Program Source Selection

ATTN: Richard Axtell, Procurement Contracting Officer

75 Vandenberg Street, Bldg. 1630

Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-2100

Phone: 781-225-9141

The "original" proposal shall be identified on the front cover of each volume.

For electronic copies, indicate on CD-ROM the proposal section and title. Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions of the proposal. The Offeror shall submit proposals in electronic format on a virus-free CD-ROM. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by: Microsoft (MS) Word 2010, MS-Excel 2010, MS-Project 2010, and MS-Power Point

2010, as applicable.

2.1.3. Debriefings

The PCO will promptly notify Offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range; whereupon, they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505.

Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a pre-award debriefing or they may choose to wait until after the source selection decision to request a post-award debriefing.

However, Offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. The PCO will notify unsuccessful Offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.506. Upon such notification, unsuccessful

Offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring a debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.

2.1.4. Discrepancies

If an Offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the Offeror shall immediately notify the PCO in writing with supporting rationale as well as the remedies the Offeror is asking the PCO to consider as related to the omission or error. The Offeror is reminded that the United States Government (USG) reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. This reservation includes matters of additional or substitute pages of the initial proposal.

2.1.5. Electronic Reference Documents

All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities

(FedBizOpps) website at http://www.fedbizopps.gov. Potential Offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

2.1.6 Notification to Offerors/Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)

The following companies may be used to support the evaluation of the submitted proposal in a purely advisory role:

2.1.7 Communications

Exchanges of Source Selection information between USG and Offerors will be controlled by the

PCO. Encrypted e-mail will be used to transmit such information to/from Offerors with encrypted email messages that are sent and received, password-protected documents, as applicable, and

PCI, LLC

CAGE: 4XCM6

6811 Benjamin Franklin Drive, Suite 200

Columbia, MD 21406 include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104” in the Subject line per FAR

2.101 & 3.104. If the Offeror is not able to receive or open encrypted e-mails, the Offeror shall use AMRDEC SAFE (https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/), a temporary password will be set for each correspondence.

2.2 Proposal Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits

The Offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table (Table 2.1).

The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies as specified in Table 2.1. The attachments identified in the table shall be separately bound in three-ring, loose-leaf binders, as necessary. If electronic copies conflict with paper copies, the signed paper copy shall take precedence. The contents of each proposal volume are described in the ITO paragraph as noted in the table 2.1.

Table 2.1 - Proposal Organization

Proposal

Volume

ITO

Paragraph

Number

Volume Title

Hard Copies

(including one original)

Electronic

Copies

Page

Limit

I

Executive Summary

(a) Master Table of

Contents

(b) Proposal Transmittal

Letter

(c) Executive Summary

(d) Proposal Assumptions

(e) Glossary

3 1 8

II

Technical

(a) Table of Contents

(b) List of Tables and

Drawings

(c) Glossary

(d) Integrated Master

Schedule

(e) Installation and

Integration Plan

(f) Compliance Matrix

(g) Products

Brochures/Technical

Data Sheets (not included in page count restriction)

(h) Risk Mitigation Plan

3 1 200

III

Past Performance

(a) Table of Contents

(b) Past Performance

Information (Relevant and Recent Contracts)

(c) Organizational

Structure Change

History

(d) Evidence of

Transmittal of

Questionnaires

(e) Subcontractor Consent

(f) Glossary

3 1 40

IV Cost/Price 3 1 No Limit

V Contract Documentation 3 1 No Limit

2.2.1 Page Limitations

Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal and excess paper copies will be returned to the Offeror as soon as practicable. Page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs).

The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the Offerors.

2.2.1.1. Page Size and Format

A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be 8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts. Pages shall be single spaced and numbered. Except for the reproduced sections of the solicitation document, the text size shall be Times New Roman 12 point. Tracking, kerning, and leading values shall not be changed from the default values of the word processing or page layout software. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom and ¾-inch side margins. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume.

These page size and format restrictions shall apply to responses to ENs. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.

Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible, and shall not exceed 11 by 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume, and count as two pages. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics not for pages of text. For tables, charts, graphs and figures, the text shall be Times New Roman and no smaller than 12 point. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.

2.2.2 Cost or Pricing Related Data

All cost or pricing data shall be addressed ONLY in the Cost/Price Proposal and Contract

Documentation Volumes.

2.2.3 Classified Information

This Project is unclassified. The Solicitation does not contain classified information, and the

Offeror’s proposal shall not include classified data. The solution provided by the Offeror must be reviewed for the presence of Critical Program Information (CPI) and Critical Components.

Systems that contain CPI or Critical Components must be identified and protected in accordance with the standards articulated in DODI 5200.39 "Critical Program Information within the

Department of Defense" and any associated system Program Protection Plans (PPP).

2.2.4 Cross-Referencing

To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with a minimum of cross referencing to other volumes of the proposal.

Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity.

The Offeror shall provide a Cross-Reference Matrix IAW Enclosure 1 to this Attachment, indicating the proposal reference information as it relates to the matrix correlating the proposed

Statement of Objectives (SOO) and Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) with applicable requirements contained in the Model Contract, and Statement of Objectives.

2.2.5 Indexing

Each volume shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections.

2.2.6 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, and with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

2.2.7 Binding and Labeling

Each volume of the proposal should be separately bound in a three-ring, loose leaf binder permitting the volume to lie flat when open. Staples shall not be used. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, title, copy number, solicitation identification, and the Offeror's name. The same identifying data should be placed on the spine of each binder. All unclassified document binders shall have a color other than red or other applicable security designation colors. Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on disclosure and use of data, and FAR 3.104-

4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source

Selection Information.

2.3 Electronic Offers

The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. For electronic copies, indicate on each CD the volume number and title. Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including subfactors, exhibits, annexes, and attachments, if any. The

Offeror shall submit all volumes in electronic format, using recordable CDs. Each volume shall be in a different directory on a CD. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by

Microsoft (MS) Office Word 2010, MS Office Excel 2010, MS Office Project 2010, and MS Office

Power Point 2010, as applicable. In the event that hard copies and electronic copies of a proposal are submitted and if there are any discrepancies between the hard copies and the electronic copies of the proposal, the hard copies will be used for evaluation.

3.0 Volume I - Executive Summary

In the executive summary volume, the Offeror shall provide the following information:

(a) Master Table of Contents

(b) Proposal Transmittal Letter

(c) Executive Summary

(d) Proposal Assumptions

(e) Glossary

3.1 Executive Summary

The executive summary should be concise narrative summary of the entire proposal, to include addressing the significant risks, and highlighting any key or unique features, excluding cost/price.

The salient features should tie in with Section M evaluation factors/subfactors. Any summary material presented here shall not be considered as meeting the requirements for any portions of other volumes of the proposal.

3.2 Table of Contents

Include a master table of contents of the entire proposal (not included in the 8 page limit for the

Volume).

4.0 Volume II - Technical Volume

4.1 General

The Technical Volume should be specific and complete. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. Your responses will be evaluated against the Technical Factor defined in Section

M, Evaluation Factors for Award. Using the instructions provided below, provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing/satisfying these subfactors.

All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. By your proposal submission, you are representing that your firm will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation.

It is not necessary or desirable for you to tell us so in your proposal. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation.

4.2 Format and Specific Content

Your proposed technical approach and methodology/processes/procedure for accomplishing

/satisfying all technical requirements and objectives shall be presented in the Technical Volume.

In this volume, your proposed approach shall map to the Technical Factor identified in Section M.

4.3 Technical

In the technical volume, address your technical solution for meeting or exceeding the

Government’s minimum performance or capability requirements of each technical subfactor.

4.3.1 Sub-factor 1: Management Approach

In the Management Approach, the Offeror shall provide information about how they will meet all threshold requirements in the USG’s Statement of Objectives (SOO).

a) Describe the Offeror’s approach to conducting the Site Survey and list information that will be included the Site Survey Report.

b) Describe the Offeror’s approach to administer Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) for

NAVAIDS Program systems.

c) Describe the Offeror’s approach to provide an executable plan for overall management of work effort to include: planning, monitoring, controlling, and communication.

d) Describe the Offeror’s approach for its Installation and Test.

e) Describe the Offeror’s approach to manage its resources during the performance of this effort.

4.3.2 Sub-factor 2: Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

The Offeror shall provide an IMS that satisfies the SOO based on the Contract Line Item Number

(CLIN) Structure for the Site Survey, and CLS for Starokonstantyniv Air Base in Ukraine.

4.3.3 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

The intent of this section is to obtain a functionally integrated understanding of the proposal with clear tracks between the technical, cost, schedule, management, etc., in a way that provides the

Government confidence that the program is structured to be executable for the resources indicated.

The IMS is a detailed task and timing of the work effort in the IMP and is used as the primary tracking tool for technical and schedule status.

The IMS is an integrated and networked multi-layered schedule of program/project tasks. The

IMS identifies all IMP events, accomplishment, and criteria and the expected dates of each. These dates are based on the calendar dates provided as the starting point and the logical flow of dates provided by calculating the addition of duration of all tasks using typical schedule networking tools. The IMS tasks will be directly traceable to the WBS, IMP, SOO and CLINs.

The Offeror shall provide a top-level IMS as part of the proposal submittal. The more detailed levels of the IMS, as well as updates, will be submitted after contract award as a CDRL deliverable.

The IMS is intended as a tool for day-to-day tracking of the program/project that rolls up to increasingly higher summary levels. All tasks/activities in the IMS should be logically linked together showing predecessor/successor relationships. The activities and tasks will be sufficient to account for the entire program under contract.

4.3.4 Sub-factor 3: Repair and Return/Warranty Plan & Procedures

The Offeror shall provide detailed procedures for exercising the Warranty, to include but not limited to: warranty coverage period and voidance; detailed instructions for submitting warranty claims (including POC name, telephone, email, address, etc.); notification process for submitting warranty claims and for obtaining return material authorizations (if required); accompanying forms required to be submitted with warranty items (e.g. customer failure report); and any specific instructions, statements, or packaging requirements for import/export of repair items.

4.3.5 Sub-factor 4: Risk Mitigation

The Offeror shall provide a reasonable mitigation plan that identifies and addresses risks to the USG to include, but not limited to, the following:

a) If the USG cannot travel to Ukraine, how does the Offeror recommend USG validate site survey report?

b) If the USG cannot travel to Ukraine, how does the Offeror recommend USG assess contractor performance?

c) If power is not available for the NAVAIDS Program Systems, how would the Offeror mitigate the risk to the site survey and installation?

d) If the amount of equipment to be replaced exceeds funds available, how does the Offeror propose to list equipment to assist the US USG decide which equipment to purchase, or not purchase?

e) Approach to implementing a comprehensive, disciplined, integrated, structured Program

Protection process that addresses Critical Program Information (CPI) identification, anti-tamper procedures, criticality analysis, vulnerability assessment, malicious code insertion, and

f) threat assessment.

4.3.6 Sub-factor 7: Small Business Evaluation

The Offeror shall provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan. The Subcontracting Plan will become an attachment at contract award.

5.0 Volume III - Past Performance

5.1 General

Offeror’s shall submit recent Past Performance information relevant to the requirements outlined within this RFP.

5.2 Volume Organization

The Past Performance Volume shall be organized in the following general outline:

a) Table of Contents

b) Past Performance Information (Relevant and Recent Contracts)

c) Organizational Structure Change History

d) Evidence of Transmittal of Questionnaires

e) Subcontractor Consent

f) Glossary

5.3 Past Performance Information (PPI)

Submit information on contracts/task orders you consider most relevant in demonstrating your ability to perform the proposed effort. The Offeror shall submit Performance Information Sheets in accordance with the format contained in Enclosure 3. This information is required on the Offeror and subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners proposed to perform aspects of the effort the Offeror considers critical to overall successful performance. Offerors are cautioned that the USG will use data provided by each Offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past performance. “Prime contractor” means the legal entity with which the USG creates contractual privity by entering into a contract. “Subcontractor,” “teaming partner,” and “joint venture partners” mean any supplier, distributor, vendor, or firm that furnishes supplies or services to or for a prime contractor or another subcontractor, teaming partner, or joint venture partner. The Offeror shall submit up to eight (8) total Performance Information Sheets identifying active or completed contracts or task orders, either Government or commercial. Each relevant contract/task order shall have been performed during the past 8 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation and continuing up to date of award. Of the maximum of eight (8) PPI citations an

Offeror may submit, it may choose to include up to five (5) PPI citations on key teaming partners or subcontractors that it considers most relevant in demonstrating its ability to perform the requirements within the solicitation. Performance Information Sheets, up to eight, are limited to a maximum of 40 pages total. Offerors are cautioned that the Government will use data provided by each Offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past and present performance

5.3.1 Relevant Contracts

For a description of the characteristics or aspects the USG will consider in determining relevance, see section M, 4.0 Factor 3: Past Performance. In addition to the submission of information on contracts considered relevant, include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance. Explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort and clearly link the PPI to the Technical factor. Indicate whether your performance on the contract was as a Prime, subcontractor or teaming partner. Offerors are cautioned that the USG will use data provided by each Offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of performance.

5.3.2 Recent Contracts

The USG will only consider contracts to be recent if they were performed during the past five (5) years from the release date of this solicitation.

5.3.3 Organizational Structure Change History

Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, or otherwise merged with other companies, and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant past efforts or between conclusion of recent past efforts and this source selection. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate this relevancy determination, include in this proposal volume a "roadmap" describing all such changes in the organization of your company. A pamphlet or other commercial document describing such reorganizations may suffice. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts you identify for past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment. Since the Government intends to consider past performance information provided by other sources as well as that provided by the Offeror(s), your "roadmap" should be both specifically applicable to the efforts you identify and general enough to apply to efforts on which the

Government receives information from other sources.

5.4 Evidence of Transmittal of Questionnaires

The Offeror shall coordinate Past Performance Questionnaires (Enclosure 2 to this Attachment) with each of the POCs identified in the Past Performance Volume, and provide evidence of transmission to those POCs. The Offeror may add its own transmittal letter to provide an Offeror representative name and telephone number; in case questions arise from the POC receiving the questionnaires. In your transmittal letter, direct the POCs to submit completed questionnaires directly to the USG POCs. The USG POCs are listed in the above paragraph 2.1.1 Points of

Contact. Once the Past Performance Questionnaires are completed by the POCs, the information contained therein shall be considered sensitive and shall not be released to you, the Offeror.

5.5 Subcontractor Consent

The Offeror shall submit, along with the information required in this Volume, a consent letter executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the Offeror so the Offeror can respond to such information. For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the Offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter, authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the

Offeror’s performance.

6.0 Volume IV - Cost/Price

6.1 Introduction

These instructions are to assist you in submitting information other than cost or pricing data that is required to evaluate the reasonableness and realism of your proposed cost/price. Compliance with these instructions is mandatory and failure to comply may result in rejection of your proposal.

For award purposes, evaluation will be in accordance with Section M.

6.2 General Instructions

6.2.1 Cost/Price Reasonableness and Realism

Note that unrealistically low or unreasonably high proposed costs or prices, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the Offeror does not understand the requirement or has made an unrealistic proposal. Offers should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate their reasonableness and realism. The burden of proof for credibility of proposed costs/prices rests with the Offeror. All cost information included in the proposal must be consistent with the Cost/Price Volume.

6.2.2 Ground Rules and Assumptions

The Offeror shall identify all ground rules and assumptions (GR&A) used in developing the pricing documentation, as well as GR&A’s used in developing its proposal.

6.3 Cost/Price Data

Data beyond that required by this instruction shall not be submitted, unless you consider it essential to document or support your cost/price position. All data relating to the proposed price, including all required supporting documentation, must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the Cost/Price volume. Under no circumstances shall this data and documentation be included elsewhere in the proposal.

6.3.1 Cost or Pricing Data Requirements

The PCO has made a preliminary determination of “Adequate Price Competition”. Therefore, a

Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data per FAR 15.403-4 will not be required. In the event that adequate competition does not emerge in response to the solicitation, the PCO may require current cost and pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.4.

In accordance with FAR 15.403-1(b) and 15.403-3(a), information other than cost or pricing data may be required to support cost or price reasonableness and cost realism. Information shall be provided in accordance with FAR 15.403-5. If, after receipt of proposals, the PCO determines that there is insufficient information available to determine price reasonableness and none of the exceptions in FAR 15.403-1 apply, the Offeror shall be required to submit cost or pricing data.

6.3.2 Subcontracts

This worksheet tab shall identify the offeror’s subcontractors. For this cost type CLIN, identify each separate subcontract costs to be incurred by either the prime, an interdivisional transfer, or another subcontractor. Each line item, shall identify the applicable source (i.e. prime, division, or subcontractor).

7.0 Volume V - Contract Documentation

7.1 Model Contract/Representations and Certifications

The purpose of this volume is to provide information to the Government for preparing the contract document and supporting file. The Offeror's proposal shall include a signed copy of the Model

Contract, and Sections A through K. Fill in all blanks in the Model Contract and in Sections A through K with either specific information or with “N/A” not applicable.

7.1.1 Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

Completion of blocks 12 through 16 and signature and date for blocks 17 and 18 of the SF 33.

Signature by the Offeror on the SF 33 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept.

The "original" copy should be clearly marked under separate cover and should be provided without any punched holes.

7.1.2 Section B - Supplies or Services and Costs/Prices

Completed pricing information in Section B of the model contract.

7.1.3 Section F - Deliveries or Performance

See FA8730-19-R-0012 Section F, page 14 for the period of performance of this contract.

7.1.4 Section G - Contract Administrative Data

See FA8730-19-R-0012 Section G, page 15 for the contract administrative data for this contract.

7.1.5 Section I – Contract Clauses

The Offeror shall complete all contractual requirements and abide by all listed clauses in accordance with all sections of the contract.

7.1.6 Section J – List of Attachments

Exhibit A - Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRL)

The CDRLs and DD1423s are a required submission as a part of the contractual effort but are not required to be submitted with the Offerors proposal.

Attachment 1 – Statement of Objectives (SOO)

A SOO is provided by the Government (RFP, Section J). Modifications to this document are not allowed. This is not a required submission as a part of the Offerors proposal.

Small Business Subcontracting Plan

The Offeror is required to submit an Individual Subcontracting Plan IAW FAR 19.702, (Statutory

Requirements), and FAR 19.704, (Subcontracting Plan Requirements), for this effort. If applicable, submit a copy of your approved Master Plan. The Subcontracting plan must be specific to this effort unless the proposed Subcontracting Plan is part of a DOD Comprehensive

Subcontracting Plan Test program. If the Offeror is other than a small business, the Offeror’s

Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall be submitted in accordance with FAR 52.219-9 and

DFARS252.219-7003. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the Offeror identifies and commits to the participation of small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUB Zone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business (SDB), and with women-owned small business concerns, whether as joint venture partners, teaming partners, or subcontractors. Offeror’s will provide targets for participation of the aforementioned small businesses, expressed as percentages of total subcontracted value. These targets will be incorporated into and become a part of the contract.

The successful Offeror will be required to provide reports on SDB subcontractor participation in accordance with FAR clause 52.219-25 in Section I of the contract. Failure to submit such a plan will render the Offeror ineligible for award. In the event the Offeror has negotiated a

Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan pursuant to DFARS 219.702, the Offeror must submit the information that identifies and specifies the extent of its commitment to the participation of small business and Small Disadvantaged Business.

The current Department of Defense small business subcontracting goals apply to this acquisition:

TABLE 7-1. Current DoD Small Business Subcontracting Goals

Small Business 36.0%

HUB Zone Small Business 3.0%

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business 3.0%

Small Disadvantaged Business* 5.0%

Women-Owned Small Business 5.0%

* Small Disadvantaged Business awards include 8(a) awards

The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code for this action is 334511 –

Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument

Manufacturing with a size standard of 750 employees (Reference 13 CFR 121.106).

Attachment 3 – Section L – Instructions For Proposal Preparation

This section is applicable to the RFP only and is not a required submission as a part of the Offeror’s proposal.

Attachment 4 – Section M – Evaluation Factors for Award

This section is applicable to the RFP only and is not a required submission as a part of the Offeror’s proposal.

7.1.7 Section K - Representations, Certifications, and other Statements of Offeror’s

The Offeror shall follow the instructions cited in this Section K, FAR 52.204-08, DFARS 252.204-

7007 and complete all representations, certifications, acknowledgments and statements in the

System for Award Management (SAM) as part of responding to this RFP. If a representation, certification, acknowledgement or statement cited in this Section K cannot be found in SAM, then the Offeror shall submit that Section K representation, certification, acknowledgement or statement. Failure to adhere to these instructions shall render an Offeror as being ineligible for award.

7.2 Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award.

Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation. This information shall be provided in the format and content of Table 7-2.

TABLE 7-2. Solicitation Exceptions

Solicitation

Document

Page/

Paragraph

Requirement/

Portion

Rationale

SOO, Model

Contract, RFP, etc.

Applicable Page and Paragraph

Numbers

Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken

Describe why the requirement can/will not be met

7.3 Other Information Required

7.3.1 Authorized Offeror Personnel

Provide the name, title and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually.

Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government. In addition, please provide the name, title, and telephone number of the CEO, Division President, Vice President, and/or other responsible parties who may be contacted for successful or unsuccessful award notification.

7.3.2 Government Offices

Provide the mailing address, telephone and fax numbers and facility codes for the cognizant

Contract Administration Office and DCAA. Also, provide the name and telephone and fax number for the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO).

7.3.3 Company/Division Address, Identifying Codes, and Applicable Designations

Provide company/division's street address, county and facility code; CAGE code; DUNS code;

size of business (large or small (NAICS Code 334511)); and labor surplus area designation. This same information must be provided if the work for this contract will be performed at any other location(s). List all locations where work is to be performed and indicate whether such facility is a division, affiliate, or subcontractor, and the percentage of work to be performed at each location.

7.3.4 Organizational Conflict of Interest Statement and/or Mitigation Plan

All Offerors must examine their contractual obligations with the Government and those of their proposed major subcontractors for potential organizational conflicts of interest (OCI) as defined by FAR Part 9.502(c) and provide a statement identifying any potential OCI or stating that no potential conflicts exist. In the case of potential OCI, the Offeror will also submit an

Organizational Conflict of Interest Mitigation Plan detailing organizational and procedural steps to be taken to mitigate any OCI risk.

7.3.5 Section F - Deliveries or Performance

Estimated Delivery Schedule.

# Item Days

1 Contract Award

2 Post Award Conference Within 15 calendar days after Contract Award

3 Site Survey (SS) Starting within 45 calendar days after

Contract Award

SS report delivered with new equipment purchase and installation proposal to USG

60 calendar days after Site Survey complete

5 USG approve SS Report 30 calendar days after SS

Replacement equipment purchase list approved

60 calendar days after USG receives replacement equipment proposal

ENCLOSURE 1: Proposal Cross Reference Matrix (CRM) Instructions

See paragraph 2.2.4 regarding instructions for completion of the CRM, which shall be submitted as part of Volume II.

If this matrix conflicts with any other requirement, direction or provision of this solicitation, the other reference shall take precedence over this matrix. Additionally, to the extent this matrix discloses details as to the extent or manner by which the Government intends to evaluate Offeror’s proposals for award, references in the matrix are for information purposes only and the

Government shall be obligated to evaluate proposals solely in conformance with the provisions of the solicitation.

The CRM is shown below:

RFP Cross Reference Matrix

Instructions to Offerors

(Section L)

Evaluation

Factors

(Section M)

USG

SOO

Written Proposal

Volume References

(Vol, Part, Page

Number)

Contractor

CSOW

CDRL

4.1, 4.3.2 2.1 A001 – A010

4.3.3 2.2 A009

4.3.4 2.3

4.3.5 2.4

Enclosure 2 4.0

Enclosure 3 4.0

Enclosure 4 4.0

ENCLOSURE 2: Past Performance Information (PPI)

Contract Identification: To be completed by the Offeror.

Specific instructions for completing Enclosure 2 are as follows:

Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program (citation) being identified as an example of your Company’s capability in ILS/DME and VORTAC Equipment, Sustainment Program and Repair and Return Programs. Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify. Limit the number of past efforts submitted and the length of each submission to the limitations set forth in paragraph 5.3 of RFP

Instruction to Offerors attachment.

Provide a separate completed form for each contract/program submitted.

A. Company/Division…