SAM Attachment (4) - RDIF Past Performance Questionnaire 20190923.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Rapid Development Integrated Facility (RDIF) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8629-20-R-5020
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Wright Patterson Air Force Base

About this file

This request for proposal (RFP) solicits offers for an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract to establish a Rapid Development Integrated Facility (RDIF). The Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center seeks to award a single IDIQ contract with a five-year base period and one-year option to support irregular warfare and C4ISR acquisition needs. This competitive 8(a) set-aside will utilize tradeoff of past performance and price among technically acceptable proposals. Interested 8(a) offerors should provide proposals by January 3, 2020 addressing the work requirements, past performance questionnaires due by December 26, and access to ITAR data required for the first task order. Questions are due by December 19. The RFP specifies provisions and clauses for the anticipated contract to utilize Service Contract Labor Standards and cover most employee classifications.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Rapid Development Integrated Facility (RDIF), newest first.
File Type Posted
RFP Questions 1-17 -Answered.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Questions 1-13.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section L 20191212.pdf PDF
RDIF RFP Amendment.pdf PDF
RFP Questions & Comments.pdf PDF
SAM Attachment (3) - RDIF Past Performance Information Tool.pdf PDF
20191212_RFP Cover Letter.pdf PDF
Section L 20191120.pdf PDF
RDIF Price Matrix 20191029.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section M 20191107.pdf PDF
SAM Attachment (2) - RDIF PWS Live Task Order 20191114.pdf PDF
SAM Attachment (3) - RDIF Past Performance Information Tool.pdf PDF
SAM Attachment (5) - DD 2345.pdf PDF
12_20191120_RFP Cover Letter.pdf PDF
SAM Attachment (1) - FA8629-20-R-5020 Draft Model Contract 20191120.pdf PDF
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 4 – RDIF PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(Note: Offeror: Send directly to the points of contact for each contract submitted using Attachment 4 – RDIF Past Performance Information Tool. Contacts: Please answer and send directly to the Government Contracting Officer by email (preferred) or regular mail) Contracting Officer Info:

Primary: *Maj Benjamin CoffmanAlternate: Ms. Jessica Anderson
Mailing address:Same mailing address
Building 46Phone: (937) 656-8090
1895 5th StEmail: jessica.anderson.31@us.af.mil

Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7233 Phone: (937) 656-6313 Email: benjamin.coffman.1@us.af.mil

Contract Specialist: James McCauley Same mailing address Phone: (937) 713-0578 Email: james.mccauley.5@us.af.mil

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR 3.104

BACKGROUND:

A. Government POC’s Name: __________________________________________________

B. Offeror Name (Company/Division):______________________________________________

C. Program Title: _______________________ Reference Number:_______________________

D. Department/Agency/Customer Name: _______________________________________________

E. What Entity Performed the Work Under This Contract

1. Company Name:__________________________________________________________

2. DUNS Number:__________________________________________________________

3. CAGE Code:_____________________________________________________________

F. Was the work performed by the vendor on this contract (check all that apply):

1. Related to aircraft modification/integration? ( ) Yes ( ) No

2. Related to the manufacture of aircraft components? ( ) Yes ( ) No

3. Related to the manufacture of aircraft cables? ( ) Yes ( ) No

4. Related to design/development of new aircraft systems/parts? ( ) Yes ( ) No

5. Related to prototyping of new aircraft systems/parts? ( ) Yes ( ) No

6. Performed at a Government-Owned-Government-Operated facility? ( ) Yes ( ) No

7. Performed at a Government-Owned-Contractor-Operated facility? ( ) Yes ( ) No

8. If none of the above are applicable, what type of work was performed? _____________

G. When was this work performed: ____________________________________________________

H. Is the project complete? ( ) Yes ( ) No

I. Was the contract terminated prior to the agreed upon period of performance? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, Explain: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

J. Did a difference exist between initial contract cost and final contract cost? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, explain the cause of the difference: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

K. Did this firm employ any subcontractor(s) to accomplished required work? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, was the subcontractor’s performance acceptable? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If No, explain why the subcontractor’s performance was not acceptable: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If subcontractors were used, did this firm effectively manage subcontractors? ( ) Yes ( ) No If No, explain: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

L. Have any major contract requirements been terminated or rescheduled as a result of the contractor’s inability to perform? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, explain: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

M. Have any cure or show cause notices ever been issued? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, explain:

N. Has your organization ever elected to not exercise an option for this contractor? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, explain:

O. Were there any claims or litigation? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, explain:

EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. Provide comments and specific examples in the block below each item if rated above or below SATISFACTORY. This scale is defined as follows:

Performance Assessment Rating/Color Description

EXCEPTIONAL (E)/BLUE
During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.
VERY GOOD (VG)/PURPLE
During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.
SATISFACTORY (S)/GREEN
During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.
MARGINAL (M)/YELLOW
During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.
UNSATISFACTORY(U)/RED
During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.
NOT APPLICABLE (N)/WHITE
Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.
Technical Performance
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A

T1. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the contract?

Comment:

T2. How effective was the contractor at meeting schedule and mitigating disruptions or unforeseen delays to the schedule?

Comment:

T3. Overall, how effective was the contractor at manufacturing components?

Comment:

Customer Satisfaction
E
VG
S
M
U
N/A

CS1. Overall, how satisfied was your organization with the work accomplished by this company?

Comment:

CS2. All other factors being equal, would you award this contractor another contract based on their performance?
YES
NO

Comment:

NARRATIVE SUMMARY

N1. What were the contractor's most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

Comment:

N2. What were the contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract?

Comment:

N3. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor's performance, as desired.

Comment:

POC’s Name
Contact info

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .