Post-RFP_Release_Questions_and_Answers.pdf

PDF 347 KB Posted

Attached to
C-17 Roll-On Conference Capsule (ROCC) Program Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8614-17-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Wright Patterson Air Force Base

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to C-17 Roll-On Conference Capsule (ROCC) Program, newest first.
File Type Posted
Post-RFP_Release_Questions_and_Answers_Update_20_Jul_2018.pdf PDF
Post-RFP_Release_Questions_and_Answers_Update_11_July_2018.pdf PDF
Post-RFP_Release_Questions_and_Answers_Update_5_Jul_2018.pdf PDF
Post-RFP_Release_Questions_and_Answers_Update_26_Jun_2018.pdf PDF
Progress_Payment_Forecast.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section_M_11_Jun_2018.pdf PDF
ppi_tool.accdb MDB file
TO_35-1-3_Corrosion_Prevention_and_Control_Cleaning_Painting_and_Marking_of_USAF_SE.pdf PDF
C-17_ROCC_TAA_Signed_Certification_Basis_27_March_2018.pdf PDF
Copy_of_C-17_ROCC_TAA_Approved_Certification_Basis_27_March_2018.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TO_1-1-8_Application_and_Removal_of_Organic_Coatings.pdf PDF
9579777_Rev_B_-_Clarification_fo_Detailed_Test_Criteria.pdf PDF
C-17_ROCC_Section_M_(31_May).docx DOCX document
C-17_ROCC_Section_L__(31_May).pdf PDF
TO_1-1-691_Cleaning_and_Corrosion_Prevention_and_Control.pdf PDF
9579776_Rev_N_-_Product_Data_Specification.pdf PDF
RFP_31_MAY_2018.pdf PDF
7231258_Rev_D_Distro_A.PDF PDF
EN-SB-10-002_Rev_A,_Crash_Loads_and_Cargo_Restraint_EN-SB-10-002.pdf PDF
523025p.pdf PDF
AFMAN_17-1301_Computer_Security_(COMPUSEC).pdf PDF
EN-SB-10-002_App_A,_Crash_Loads_and_Cargo_Restraint_Appendices.pdf PDF
Copy_of_ROCC_Pricing_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
7133043_(RING_ASSEMBLY-PALLET)_Disto_A.PDF PDF
C-17_ROCC_Section_M_(31_May).pdf PDF
7031839_Rev_C_Distro_A.PDF PDF
7133042_H.PDF PDF
7031843_N.PDF PDF
Industry_Day_10_May.pdf PDF
C-17_ROCC_TAA_Signed_Certification_Basis_27_March_2018.pdf PDF
9579776_Rev_N_-_Product_Data_Specification.pdf PDF
7031843_N.PDF PDF
EN-SB-10-002_App_A,_Crash_Loads_and_Cargo_Restraint_Appendices.pdf PDF
7231256_Rev_B_Disro_A.PDF PDF
EN-SB-10-002_Rev_A,_Crash_Loads_and_Cargo_Restraint_EN-SB-10-002.pdf PDF
TO_1-1A-9_Aerospace_Metals_-_General_Data.pdf PDF
H001_(FBO).pdf PDF
TO_1-1-8_Application_and_Removal_of_Organic_Coatings.pdf PDF
7133042_H.PDF PDF
7031839_Rev_C_Distro_A.PDF PDF
7231258_Rev_D_Distro_A.PDF PDF
AFMAN_17-1301_Computer_Security_(COMPUSEC).pdf PDF
7133043_(RING_ASSEMBLY-PALLET)_Disto_A.PDF PDF
TO_1-1-691_Cleaning_and_Corrosion_Prevention_and_Control.pdf PDF
H002_(FBO).pdf PDF
9579777_Rev_B_-_Clarification_fo_Detailed_Test_Criteria.pdf PDF
Draft_RFP_V2.pdf PDF
Copy_of_C-17_ROCC_TAA_Approved_Certification_Basis_27_March_2018.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
C-17_ROCC_SOW.pdf PDF
ROCC_CDRL_Package.pdf PDF
Show all 50

C-17 Roll-On Conference Capsule (ROCC) Program has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

C-17 Roll-On Conference Capsule (ROCC)

Post-RFP Release Questions and Answers June 2018

Q1: SLS Workstation (SRD 3.10.6.6) - May the Seats and Workstation be positioned fore and aft, with a table in between, or must they be placed side by side with a table on one side?

A1: Offerors may design the workstation however they determine best meets the requirements of the

RFP.

Q2: Is the ROCC classified as a Facility, Aircraft, Transportable, or Special Category Facility in the

CNSSAM TEMPEST RED/Black Installation Guide?

A2: ROCC should be classified as a “Transportable” for TEMPEST purposes.

Q3: Can we include a micro-phone in the VTC/IFE equipment suite?

A3: There is no requirement for a microphone; the travel teams provide any necessary microphone for the carry-on VTC system. It is not desired for a microphone to be integrated into any other equipment provided as part of the ROCC because of the possibility that classified conversations could be picked up inadvertently.

Q4: Paragraph, 3.5.9a in the SRD, is not included in the Table of Integration tests to be performed by

Government as noted in the SOW; is this an oversite?

A4: No, this was not an oversight. Paragraph 3.5.9/4.5.9 is verified through inspection and test. In section 3 of the SRD, paragraph 3.5.9 is not broken into two parts. It is one requirement. 3.5.9a in the test matrix deals with the design inspection aspect of the requirement. 3.5.9b deals with the test portion that is accomplished by the LDTO. The test matrix is for reference only; the actual requirements are in sections 3 and 4 of the SRD.

Q5: Attachment 4 appears to be a spreadsheet within Schedule L which is a word document. Would the government please provide Attachment 4 in excel format?

A5: Section L, Attachment 4 will be provided in excel format.

Q6: Please clarify why Section M table for SF 1 rating goes from Blue through Red, but an accompanying statement (from Amendment 1) states that the highest possible rating is Purple. If Purple is the highest possible rating the "color" table should be consistent with that statement.

A6: The table is from the DoD Source Selection procedures. The language in Amendment 1 simply clarifies that the highest possible rating is Purple, because there is only one possible strength.

----------- End of Document -----------

File details come from the government source that posted it.