FA860425RB030 QA Set 2.pdf
PDF 296 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FA8604 MMHS, Storage Aid System for Ebbing Field ANG, Arkansas Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA860425RB030
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) Set 2 for the Ebbing Field project (Solicitation Number FA860425RB030), addressing several technical specifications and clarifications. The Q&A covers key details including workplace elevation confirmation (all ground floor work), collapsible storage container dimensions (34" height is acceptable), and equipment inclusion details for Building 108. Specific clarifications include: 1) black-lined objects in drawings are existing and not included in the project scope, 2) modular cabinets and pallet racks are included in the project scope, and 3) pallet rack depth can be 1.5' for this application. The document provides precise responses to vendor inquiries about equipment specifications, dimensional tolerances, and project scope, ensuring clear communication about the project's technical requirements.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA860425RB030 QA Set 1 Revised.pdf | ||
| FA860425RB030_QandA_Set 1.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA860425RB030
Ebbing Field Q&A Set 2
1. Workplace Elevation. It appears that all work is on the ground floor of the four buildings. For example, that no 2nd floor or mezzanine work is involved. Please confirm or advise otherwise.
All ground floor work.
CLIN 0012. Collapsible Storage Containers are specified at 48”L x 40”W x 36”H on AEB306_01_REV1_.pdf. This size profile does not appear to be commercially available. Our research indicates the following options are available (all dimensions +/- 1”)
a. 48”L x 40”W x 34”H Acceptable
b. 48”L x 40”W x 40”H not acceptable
Questions:
2. i. Are either of these dimensional profiles acceptable?
Yes, 34” H is acceptable
3. ii. If so, which is preferred?
a) 34”H X
b) 40”H not acceptable
4. Regarding AEB306_01_REV1_.pdf
• Please see the screenshot directly above for this drawing.
• It appears that the black-lined objects are existing.
• However, due to the references to “modular cabinets” and “pallet rack”, we would like to be clear.
Question: Please confirm that the black-lined objects in this screenshot
1. Are existing, or advise otherwise.
Black lined are existing and not included
5. Regarding AEB306_03_REV2_.pdf
Please see the screenshot directly above - captioned drawing
Question: Please advise if the equipment boxed in red is included in the scope of work for this project:
• “Modular Cabinets”
• “Pallet Rack”
They are included.
6. Regarding AEB306_02.pdf
Please see the screenshot directly above this question (from the above captioned drawing). Some OEMs are telling us that a 1.75’ (21”) deep pallet rack is non-standard:
Question: Is 1.5’ or 2.0’ deep pallet rack acceptable for this application?
1.5’ Is acceptable.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .