Question and Answers 17 JUL 2025.pdf
PDF 49 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Mobile Remote Sensing Laboratory Trailer Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA860125Q0122
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers file for Solicitation FA8601-25-Q-0122 dated 17 JUL 2025, addressing two specific vendor inquiries about a Mobile Remote Sensing Laboratory Trailer procurement. The document provides direct responses to two key questions: first, whether an extended 12-14 month trailer production timeline would be acceptable (answered "No"), and second, whether vendors could propose either a bumper pull or gooseneck trailer configuration based on their expertise (also answered "No"). The government's responses indicate strict adherence to the original solicitation requirements, with no flexibility on delivery timeline or trailer configuration.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch 1 Solicitation FA860125Q0122.pdf | ||
| SAM Questions and Answers - 1 JUL 2025.pdf | ||
| SAM Questions and Answers - 30 JUN 2025.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 - Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Atch 2 - SOW 20 MAY 2025.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers
Solicitation FA8601-25-Q-0122
17 JUL 2025
1. The solicitation calls for a 90-day delivery timeline for the trailer. Based on industry standards, a custom, purpose-built trailer typically requires 12–14 months for completion. Would this extended timeline be acceptable?
a. No
2. The solicitation references both a bumper pull and a gooseneck trailer in different sections. Given this discrepancy, would the Government allow vendors to propose the configuration that best meets the scope of work, based on their expertise?
a. No
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .