RFP_FA855319R0002_-_Clarification_-_15_May_2019.pdf
PDF 401 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8553-19-R-0002
About this file
This document is a clarification notice for Request for Proposal FA8553-19-R-0002 to provide contractor logistics support services for four to six C-130H aircraft operated by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Air Training Command-Afghanistan. The Department of the Air Force Materiel Command intends to award an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity, firm fixed price contract for a one-year base period and four one-year option periods to provide maintenance, repair, and logistics support for the aircraft stationed at Kabul International Airport and forward operating locations as needed. The clarification notice addresses an error in the pricing matrix example where add-on factors were incorrectly shown as percentages rather than the required format of 1.xxx as instructed in the proposal instructions. Offerors are to submit pricing with add-on factors in the 1.xxx format and no proposal due date extension will be granted due to this minor administrative correction to the example.
Clarification of Pricing Matrix (Attachment 9)
View the file
Other files
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP FA8553-19-R-0002
Afghanistan CLS
RFP Clarification
An error has been discovered within the Pricing Matrix (Attachment 9) Example, CRNF CLINs table, page 199, Section M of the original Request for Proposal.
This example shows an illustration of proposed add-on factors expressed as “0.025” or “0.026” in the fillable grey cells of the pricing matrix. This contradicts the instructions given in Section L, paragraph F.
Volume V. Cost/Price, which states that Add-on factors must be expressed as 1.xxx, not percentages.
Please note that the example in the table is a typo and is incorrect. Offerors are to input Add-on factors within the Pricing Matrix, expressed as 1.xxx, not percentages.
Also note that this error only occurs within the example imbedded in Section M of the RFP document, not in the Pricing Matrix attachment.
Due to this being a minor administrative typo and the fact that the correct instructions are clear within Section L, no proposal due date extension will be granted as a result.
John M. Evans III
PCO
| 2019-05-15T14:23:56-0400 | |
| EVANS.JOHN.M.III.1396503510 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .