DRAFT_Attach 09_Relevancy Table.pdf

PDF 136 KB Posted

Attached to
TH-1H Depot Level Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8552-23-R-0006
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

About this file

This document contains a relevancy table for evaluating past performance examples submitted in response to a pre-solicitation notice for TH-1H Depot Level Maintenance requirements issued by the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center at Robins Air Force Base. The relevancy table requests information on past efforts including the nature of business areas involved, required technology levels, materials and production processes experience, performance locations, contract types, program similarity to TH-1H maintenance, program complexity, program phase, extent of subcontractor involvement, and frequency of work performed. Offerors are to complete the right-hand column describing the details of past efforts being submitted for evaluation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RELEVANCY TABLE

Attachment 09

(Complete with each effort submitted for evaluation)

This table will assist the PCO in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the TH-1H DLM Competitive Source Selection Offeror/joint venture member/critical subcontractor, if applicable, shall only complete column three. Offeror’s/joint venture member’s/critical subcontractor’s answers are applicable only to the effort identified on the FACTS sheet/PP Questionnaire (RFP, Attachments 07/08), not the offeror’s/joint venture member’s/critical subcontractor’s proposed solutions to the instant effort. If additional space is needed, please attach a separate sheet to your response (limited to two pages). Please be as specific as possible with the fill-in information provided.

If the contract being submitted is an ordering type contractual vehicle (for example, including but not limited to an Indefinite Delivery “D” type contract per FAR 16.5), only after issuance of a delivery/task order does performance occur. The Contract Number, Total Contract Dollar Value, Period of Performance, Quantities produced/repaired, Type and Complexity of Data Deliverable submitted here should be for the order or series of orders, the offeror has performed under this ordering type contractual vehicle.

If a series of orders is being submitted, the offeror shall include a list that includes the order numbers, each order’s Total Contract Dollar Value, each order’s Period of Performance, each order’s Quantity Repaired, and the Type and Complexity of Data Deliverables on each order. If the series of orders contains more than 5 orders, include this information on a separate attachment. See Section L-900 Paragraph II. D for more information on proposal submission and Section M-900 Paragraph II. D. for evaluation information.

Offeror Name:

Cage Code:

Contract Number:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Basic Contract Number and each Order Number or Order Number within the Series of Orders)

Program Title:

Contractor/Agency/Customer:

Original Total Contract Dollar Value:

series of orders contains more than 5 orders,series of orders contains more than 5 orders, include this information on a separate attachment.include this information on a separate attachment. See See Section L-900 Section L-900 Paragraph II.Paragraph II. D for more information on proposal submission and Section D for more information on proposal submission and Section M-900 Paragraph 900 Paragraph II. D.II. D. for evaluation for evaluation information.information.

OOfferor fferor Name:

CCage age Code:Code:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Original Total Contract Dollar Value for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Current Total Contract Dollar Value:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Current Total Contract Dollar Value for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Period of Performance:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Period of Performance for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Quantities Repaired:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Quantity Delivered/Repaired for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

Category Fill-in for the Proposed Effort (Government has completed this column)

(DO NOT CHANGE)

Fill-in for the Effort Identified Above

(Offeror/Joint Venture Member/ Critical Subcontractor completes). The effort identified above required:

1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved

Helicopter teardown, inspection, maintenance, and repair

2. Required Levels of Technology

Computerized information system for Manufacturing Resources Planning

3. Materials and Production Processes

Experience in working with Aluminum, Titanium, steel, and composite materials performing sheet metal, machining, forming, and NDI capabilities

4. Performance Location Within continental United States

5. Contract Type(s) FFP, LH, CRNF

6. Program Similarity Helicopter maintenance

7. Program Complexity Depot level disassembly, inspections, repairs, and reassembly, including function check flight

8. Program Phase Sustainment

9. Extent of Subcontractor involvement

10. Other Frequency of Work performed (i.e. quantity per year)

NatureNature of of Business Area(s)Area(s) Helicopter teardown, inspection,Helicopter teardown, inspection, maintenance,maintenance, and repairrepair Helicopter teardown, inspection,Helicopter teardown, inspection, Required Levels ofRequired Levels of TechnologyTechnology

Required Levels ofRequired Levels of ComputerizedComputerized information system for information system for ManufacturingManufacturing ComputerizedComputerized information system for information system for

Resources Resources PlanningPlanning

Was this contract effort submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement:

Yes:

If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.

No: _______

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .