Q and A Attachment.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 18 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8526-20-R-0020
About this file
This document contains questions and answers regarding a solicitation for sustainment services for the C-17 Terrain and Warning System tool and annual database. Key details include that the solicitation is for maintenance and support of existing C-17 TAWS software products and annual database outputs over a potential ten-year period consisting of a one-year base period and nine one-year options. Services are required to sustain current performance of the C-17 TAWS tool and quality of the C-17 TAWS database, which are used by both U.S. Air Force and foreign military sales C-17 fleets. Responses to questions clarify submission requirements and confirm that travel costs should be proposed and the TAWS tool application will not be provided for evaluation purposes.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA8526-20-R-0020-0001.pdf | ||
| FA8526-20-R-0020.pdf | ||
| 21_30024_PWS_20200811.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_Attachment_E_Transmittal_Letter.doc | DOC document | |
| RFP_Attachment_B_TAWS_FACTS_Sheet_ACE.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_Attachment_C_TAWS_Present_and_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_ACE.doc | DOC document | |
| TAWS_2_CDRL_Pacakge.pdf | ||
| RFP_Attachment_D_TAWS_Subcontractor_and_Teaming_Member_Consent_Form_ACE.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_Attachment_A_TAWS_Client_Authorization_Letter_ACE.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA8526-20-R-0020 Official.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
C-17 TAWS RFP Questions
| C-17 TAWS | ||||
| Item | RFP Reference | Comment/Question | Government Reply | |
| 1 | RFP page 78, Provision L-900, II.A General | Request the Government clarify whether Volumes I and V are to be combined into a single | ||
| document for submittal. For Volume V, it is identified as, "Price Volume (with proposal with completed RFP" and Volume I is identified as "Completed RFP". | The Government concurs. | |||
| 2 | RFP page 78, Provision L-900, II.A General | Request the Government clarify if there are specific limitations on page size, margins and font size | ||
| for the proposal Volumes. If so, do these limitations apply to illustrations and graphics as well? | Font sizes and graphics apply to Volume II. Adjust as necessary to be 30 pages or less. | |||
| 3 | RFP page 78, Provision L-900, II.A General | Taking into consideration the potential delays in postal and private carrier package deliveries due to COVID-19, we respectfully request the Government accept proposal delivery via DoD SAFE upload in lieu of CD/DVDs to assure Government receipt. | DoD Safe Site can be used. | |
| 4 | PWS, Section 1.1 | Request the C-17 TAWS Tool application installer be provided to allow evaluation of the application. We understand sharing a complete Bidders Library may not be possible at this time as source code and certain documents may be currently marked Proprietary. | TAWS Tool Application Installer will not be provided. | |
| 5 | Cost Volume Section L-900 | It appears that the government only requires a table similar to that outlined on page 89 (CLIN level pricing) however, the RFP does make reference on page 88 that additional information associated with FAR 15.4 may be required. Should we prepare the cost formats associated with FAR 15.4 and *only* submit if requested later? | Submittal of cost formats associated with FAR 15.4 is not required to be submitted with proposal at this time | |
| 6 | Data CLINs | Is it correct to assume that the DATA CLINS should be marked as “NSP” (not separately priced)? | That is correct. Please see Amended RFP | |
| 7 | Travel | 1. There is no travel or ODC CLINs listed even though the PWS includes support for meetings that could require travel. Should we propose estimated travel or ODC or will that be negotiated after an award? | Please see amended RFP for the Travel CLIN added. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .