FA8509-20-R-0007 Contractor Questions (Update March 16).pdf

PDF 99 KB Posted

Attached to
AFLCMC ON-SITE DEPOT SUPPORT (OSDS) FOR AFSOC C-130WEAPONS SYSTEMS and SUB-SYSTEMS
Solicitation number
FA8509-20-R-0007
Issued by

About this file

This document summarizes a federal solicitation for on-site depot support services for AFSOC C-130 weapons systems and subsystems. The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center seeks a contractor to provide depot maintenance support within the first special operations maintenance group at Robins Air Force Base, with team members deploying worldwide. The base period of performance is nine months, with four one-year and one six-month option periods. Services include modification, maintenance, inspection, and technical evaluation of C-130 aircraft, components, equipment, and support systems. The total small business set-aside solicitation response date is April 6, 2020, with an anticipated July 1, 2020 award using lowest price technically acceptable procedures. The incumbent is Zenetex, LLC under contract numbers FA810817D0010 and FA810818F0043.

View the file

Other files

Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DATE

RFQ #

RFQ TITLE AFLCMC ON-SITE DEPOT SUPPORT (OSDS) FOR AFSOC C-130WEAPONS SYSTEMS and SUB-SYSTEMS

Q&A # DOCUMENT REFERENCE

(SOW PARAGRAPH, CLIN

STRUCTURE, etc)

QUESTIONS GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

1 Is there an incumbent in this position or will this be a 100% re‐hire? Incumbent is Zenetex, LLC

2 If there is an incumbent can we have the current contract number and information? Incumbent is Zenetex, LLC Contract# FA810817D0010 / FA810818F0043

Is there a primary facility number in the 1 SOMXG that we will perform our primary duties or that our CM will reside?

Primary office is in building 90700, Eason Hangar.

Will all off‐site support be issued as a separate task order since there isn’t a travel CLIN? There is a Travel CLIN (0004) on the contract. Travel will be tasked on an as needed basis within the yearly order.

5 Will there be an opportunity for a site visit? Site visit instructions are attached, dated 12 March 2020.

6 PWS Paragraph: 5.9

Could the Government please clarify their Fall Protection support per the above discussion i.e. overhead retractable harness assemblies, cranials; aircraft stands etc.?

Fall protection equipment is government provided and is a combination of resources based on the area and type of work performed. For example hangars have retractable lanyard reels that work with harnesses. Other types for example include work platforms, transportable stands with protective rails, and JLGs. Harnesses and bump caps are available for checkout from unit support sections consolidated tool kits. The Contractor is responsible for use enforcement and ensuring Knock‐it off is called if safety concern needs to be addressed before proceeding on a task.

7 PWS Paragraph: 5.29 The referenced paragraph has a subparagraph that is not chronologically numbered 5.16.1. Correct reference will be updated to 5.29.1.

8 PWS Paragraph: 2.6 and 5.19.1 Reference to para 5.19.1 does not exist in para 2.6. Correct reference will be updated to 5.31.1.

9 PWS Paragraph: 6.18 The referenced paragraph (5.11.1) does not exist in the provided PWS document. Correct reference will be updated to 5.23

10 PWS & CDRLs Table 6.1 CDRL/Deliverable

Table

Inconsistent recipient requirements between the PWS and CDRLs. Emails provided without Billet. Examples 3 and 4 below have same requirement per PWS and different requirements in the applicable CDRL. Could the Government please clarify the recipient requirements between the PWS and the CDRL block 14 (Distribution) which refers to block 16 (REMARKS), or clarify which document has preference over the other for recipient delivery?

Government preference is to give precedence to the PWS Section 6, CDRL Table and update the CDRLs to reflect offices then provide specific email lists after award.

11 PWS Paragraph 2.3.1

OSDS CDMT support shall entail all levels and all facets of maintenance such as ground handling, servicing.

Could the Government please provide examples of the above discussion i.e. Ground Handling and servicing?

Some examples are but not limited to: towing, jacking, shoring, mooring, grounding, systems servicing/de‐servicing for maintenance, application of aircraft power, systems operations, lock out/tag out to prep aircraft for maintenance et‐cetera.

12 PWS Paragraph 2.3.1 Will the OSDS CMDT be required to support multiple launches and recoveries within the OSDS CDMT SCOPE of work?

The OSDS CDMT will not launch or recover aircraft. The CDMT may be required for post OCF/FCF debrief of maintenance the team has performed.

13 CDRL A008 BLK4: 4.3.4

The following are required within CDRL A008: ‐ Respirator Protection Program, ‐ Confined Space, ‐ Lost Tool or Broken Tool Procedures. Would the Government accept the Ground Operating Procedures (GOPs) requirement (AFI‐10‐220_1P (series) to supersede the CDRL A008 required items listed in the above discussion requirement due to double documentation?

As long as adequately addressed in the GOPs to ensure understanding at the local level the Government would accept this recommendation to avoid duplicate work.

FA8509‐20‐R‐0007

3/12/2020

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .