FA8212-25-R-0004 Section M.pdf
PDF 214 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Solicitation FA8212-25-R-0004: T-38 Wing Tips
- Solicitation number
- FA8212-25-R-0004
About this file
This document is a Section M Evaluation Factors for Award for a sole source contract (FA8212-25-R-0004) for T-38 Wing Tips. The U.S. Air Force Materiel Command intends to award a one-time, firm-fixed-price contract exclusively to Northrop Grumman Corporation as the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and the only qualified manufacturer for these specific aircraft parts. The government will evaluate the proposal primarily on Total Evaluated Price (TEP), using cost and price analysis techniques to assess price reasonableness and balance, with a focus on ensuring all solicitation requirements are met, including small business subcontracting plans, representations, certifications, and security requirements. The contract is being pursued under 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1) and FAR 6.302-1, which allows for a sole source acquisition when only one responsible source can satisfy the agency's requirements.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION M
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
A. INTRODUCTION:
1. The Government intends to award the requirement represented in this solicitation to one awardee on a sole source basis. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract at all.
B. EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROCEDURES:
1. This acquisition will be evaluated, negotiated, and awarded on a sole source basis.
2. In evaluating the offeror’s price the Government will use the Total Evaluated Price
(TEP). The offeror’s Price Proposal will also be evaluated for the criteria of Price
Reasonableness and Balance.
Price Reasonableness: The proposed price will be evaluated for Price
Reasonableness. Cost analysis will be used to determine price reasonableness of individual cost elements and price analysis will be used to verify the overall price offered is fair and reasonable IAW FAR 15.404-1 and 15.403-4.
Balance: The Government may also determine the proposal unacceptable should the proposed prices be unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more items/Contract Line
Item Numbers (CLINs) is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques as those defined by FAR 15.404-1.
Total Evaluated Price (TEP): A TEP will be calculated and be used for evaluation and any subsequent negotiations., if required. The TEP will utilize the offerors proposed unit pricing for each CLIN in Section B of the solicitation and will multiply the unit price by the quantity of unites for each CLIN.
3. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions: In addition to meeting the identified factors above, The offeror is required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, acceptable small business subcontracting plan if the offeror is other than a small business (FAR 52.219-9 & 19.702(a)(1)), representations and certifications, security requirements of the DD254, and required delivery schedules.
4. The process for the evaluation of the proposal is as follows:
a. The offeror's Total Evaluated Price will be calculated.
b. The proposal will be evaluated to ensure all solicitation requirements identified above have been met. If the offeror fails to meet the solicitation requirements identified above they will be notified during any subsequent discussions and negotiations.
c. The offeror is required to be determined responsible as described in FAR 9.104.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .