EX_Scissor_Lifts_-_Tech_Eval_Ck_List_-_Revised_24_Aug_16.pdf

Explosion Proof Scissor Lifts - Technical Evaluation Criteria Checklist

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the specified minimum requirements of the solicitation.

a) Subfactor One: Explosion Proof Scissor Lifts

The Government will assess the Offeror’s proposed approach and design for the Explosion Proof Scissor Lifts. Offerors are required to present all the information as stated in the Instructions to Offerors (ITO), FAR 52.212-1. The subfactor minimum is met when the Offeror’s proposal demonstrates an adequate understanding, and thoroughly substantiates all of the following essential components with little potential for disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance:

Subfactor One:

Explosion Proof Scissor Lifts

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Needs More Information

a. An acceptable approach for meeting all 3rd Party Certification requirements for Class I, Division I, hazardous environment requirements for aircraft painting operations of the SOW para. 3.1 (b)

b. An acceptable approach for meeting battery powered requirements of the SOW para 3.1 (a) and (d)

c. An acceptable approach for equipping the scissor lifts with customized lift fall protection systems for exiting the platform and performing tasks up to six feet from the platform. The fall protection system shall be certified by a Qualified Fall Protection Engineer documenting the designed system meets

OSHA/ANSI Z359 requirements per SOW para 3.1 (c)

d. An acceptable approach for meeting the minimum battery charging requirements SOW para 3.1 (e)

e. An acceptable approach for meeting the minimum number of personnel requirements (minimum weight capacity of 600lbs.) of the SOW para 3.1 (f)

f. An acceptable approach for supporting the operation of compressed air operated tools of the SOW para 3.1 (g)

g. An acceptable approach for meeting the minimum height requirements of the SOW para 3.1. (j)

h. An acceptable approach for meeting the NEMA wet locations enclosure requirements of the SOW para 3.1 (h)

i. An acceptable approach for meeting the standard safety equipment of the SOW para 3.1 (i)

j. An acceptable approach for meeting the minimum width requirements of the SOW para 3.1. (k)

k. An acceptable approach for meeting the removable battery tray requirements SOW para 3.1. (l)

l. An acceptable approach for meeting the padded rail safety requirements SOW para 3.1. (m)

m. An acceptable approach for meeting the collision avoidance requirements SOW para 3.1. (n)