Attachment L-5 MSS Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 105 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Air Force Medical Service (AFMS) Medical Support Services (MSS) Program Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8053-11-R-0003
About this file
Solicitation FA8053-11-R-0003 Attachment L-5 MSS Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 46
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT L-5 – Medical Support Services Past Performance Questionnaire
When filled in, this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Offeror: Complete SECTION 1, and send the questionnaire to the primary customer point of contact (POC) identified as a reference in your proposal.
Primary Customer POC: Complete SECTIONS 2-5 and sign/date questionnaire.
Handwritten responses are sufficient. If you need more space, please attach additional pages. If you have any questions, please call the Contracting Officer, Ms. Clarinda Smith at DSN 674-5040 (937-904-5040). Please fax the completed 5-page questionnaire to: DSN Fax: 986-7520 (937-656-7520) or e-mail « .pdf » file to clarinda.smith@wpafb.af.mil.
SOLICITATION NUMBER: FA8053-11-R-0003 OFFEROR: ____________________________
SECTION 1: REFERENCE IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor
| B. Contractor Performed as |
| Prime Contractor Subcontractor |
Other (specify) ______________________
Teaming Structure/Key Partners
C. Contract Number
(IAW M.6.2.4, single Reference for MAC, task orders, option periods; GSS or GSA are separate references)
D. Contract Type
| E. Was this a competitive contract? |
| Yes |
No
F. Period(s) of Performance (list all option periods, if applicable)
G. Initial Contract Award Amount(4)
H. Total Current/Final Contract Cost ($)
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs (enter below):
J. Description of service provided (enter below):
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION (Page 2 of 5)
A. Customer or Agency Name
B. Customer or Agency Description (i.e., hospital)
C. Geographic Performance Location under this contract, (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Command). List States where services were provided below:
D. Provide number of full-time or part-time equivalent positions that were provided by the contract.
| List Individual Positions (fill out ONLY if providing personnel to a client) |
| FTEs |
| PTEs |
| N/A |
Clerical labor categories (i.e., secretary, appointment clerk, office clerk)
Certified labor categories (i.e., medical coding professionals, transcriptionists, records technicians)
Specialized labor categories (i.e., beneficiary services/PEBLO, tumor registrars, referral management personnel, utilization managers, third party collection clerks)
Technical labor categories (i.e., logistics, supply, equipment technicians, public health, safety specialists)
Other labor categories (list them below)
| Full Operational Activities (fill out ONLY if contractor perform an entire service i.e., staffing, operational planning, personnel management, reporting & corrective actions). |
| FTEs |
| PTEs |
| N/A |
Patient Appointing Service
Medical Records Service
Medical Coding & Auditing Service
Medical Transcription Service
Referral Management Service
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION (Page 3 of 5)
A. Evaluator's Name
B. Evaluator's Title
C. Evaluator's Phone/Fax Number
D. Evaluator’s Mailing Address
E. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please confirm that your evaluation is consistent with the description of service provided in Section 1, Paragraph J on Page 1 of the survey. Indicate compliance of the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in either YES or NO blocks. Indicate your satisfaction is the overall evaluation using the scale provided below:
| CODE |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| E |
| EXCEPTIONAL – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and consistently exceeds many. Very few, if any, minor problems were encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action. |
| V |
| VERY GOOD – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and consistently exceeds some. For any problems encountered, the contractor took effective and timely corrective action. |
| S |
| SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. For any problems encountered, the contractor took effective and timely corrective action. |
| M |
| MARGINAL – The contractor’s performance does not meet some contractual requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required. |
| N |
| NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance aspect. |
| Business Plan (Subfactor 1) |
| YES |
| NO |
| N/A |
Demonstrated the ability and willingness to perform requirements for the customer.
Effectively integrated business practices over geographic range and scope of requirements.
Managed teaming partners/subcontractors on this contract.
Implemented sound strategies and contingency plans to safeguard service delivery.
Business Plan rating for business approach and teaming structure.
(CIRCLE ONE)
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
SECTION 4: EVALUATION (continued) (Page 4 of 5)
| HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN (Subfactor 2) |
| YES |
| NO |
| N/A |
Demonstrated a strong recruiting methodology, market knowledge and personnel selection process.
Demonstrated ability to hire and place fully qualified personnel (meeting all education, experience, as well as health and certification requirements) within contracted timeframes.
Demonstrated ability to replace personnel due to planned/unplanned absences or vacancies within the contracted timeframes.
Demonstrated ability to provide personnel that comply with DoD security requirements and are educated about the military healthcare system.
Demonstrated ability to provide trained personnel on DoD computer systems (CHCS/AHLTA), and position requirements.
Managed a qualified workforce and demonstrated day-to-day employee oversight and corporate requirements such as absenteeism, time and attendance, continued education, and appraisals.
| Human Resource Management rating for recruiting, training, qualifying and personnel management. (CIRCLE ONE) |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Performance Management Plan (Subfactor 3) |
| Yes |
| No |
| N/A |
Assess employee performance to ensure compliance with performance standards.
Demonstrated a customer satisfaction process and an ability to resolve issues or complaints in a timely manner.
Demonstrated the ability to maintain a stable workforce with minimal turnover of personnel and an overall fill rate of at least 95% annually.
Complied with contract terms and conditions specific to contract bid rates.
Monitored and reported performance measures; provided contract deliverables on time.
| Performance Management rating for delivery of quality services, customer satisfaction, maintaining a stable workforce, compliance with price thresholds and monitoring and report activities. (CIRCLE ONE) |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Overall contract performance rating. (CIRCLE ONE)
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
N/A
SECTION 4: EVALUATION (continued) (Page 5 of 5)
Please discuss each response for any question or rating which you indicated Marginal, Unsatisfactory or Not Applicable in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default, convenience, or are there any pending terminations?
Yes
No
Default
Convenience
Pending Terminations
If yes, please explain below (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired. Use a separate sheet if necessary.
Evaluator's Printed Name/Title
Evaluator's Signature/Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .