FA706025Q0029 - Attachment 4 - Evaluation Criteria .pdf

PDF 133 KB Posted

Attached to
PKA - 11 CES Automatic Generator Monitoring Devices
Solicitation number
FA706025Q0029
Issued by

About this file

This document is an Evaluation Criteria attachment for Solicitation FA706025Q0029 for 11 CES Automatic Monitoring Devices for Emergency Generators. The government will award the contract to the most advantageous responsible offeror based on three key evaluation factors: (i) capability of the item/service to meet Performance Work Statement requirements, (ii) past performance, and (iii) price. Offers will be rated as acceptable or unacceptable (pass/fail) with specific definitions for each rating level. Past performance will be evaluated using contracts performed within the last three years, with relevance determined by similar scope, magnitude, and complexity. The government reserves the right to perform price realism analysis and may withhold award if a proposal is deemed unrealistic, and will rank acceptable offerors by price while analyzing potential price unbalancing.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA706025Q0029 – 11 CES Automatic Monitoring Devices for Emergency Generators Attachment 4 - Evaluation Criteria

52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (as addended).

Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers as acceptable or unacceptable (pass or fail):

(i) Capability of the item/service offered to meet the requirement(s) of the PWS;

a. Acceptable is defined as offer/proposal meets requirements of the solicitation.

b. Unacceptable is defined as offer/proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation.

(ii) Past performance: the government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on information provided by the offeror; any past performance information obtained from survey/questionnaires (Attachment 7); and any data independently obtained by the government. Offerors are responsible for submitting past performance information as part of its offer/proposal—failure to do so may result in an unacceptable rating.

a. Acceptable is defined as: based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

b. Unacceptable is defined as: based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

c. Recent past performance information is defined as contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last three (3) years prior to the issuance date of the solicitation.

d. Relevant is defined as present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(iii) Price: the government will rank the Acceptable offerors by price. The evaluation will document the fairness and reasonableness of the proposed price. In addition, each offeror’s separately priced line items or subline items shall be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced. The government reserves the right to perform price realism analysis. In the event that the Government elects to perform price realism analysis, the Government reserves discretion over the methodology used. If the Government elects to perform a price realism analysis and finds a proposal unrealistic, the Government may withhold award to that offeror.

(b) Options. Omitted.

FA706025Q0029 – 11 CES Automatic Monitoring Devices for Emergency Generators Attachment 4 - Evaluation Criteria

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .