Final RFP Questions Answers Addendum.pdf

PDF 12 KB Posted

Attached to
AFOTEC Operational Test & Evaluation Services (OTES)
Solicitation number
FA7046-10-R-0001
Issued by

About this file

Addendum to Final RFP Questions Responses

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FA7046-10-R-0001 Amendment 0002.doc DOC document
FA7046-10-R-0001 Amendment 0001.doc DOC document
Final RFP Questions Answers.pdf PDF
AFOTECMAN 99-101 Operational Test Processes and Procedures.pdf PDF
AFOTEC Form 4 Functional Commander-Functional Director Review Log.pdf PDF
AFOTEC Form 3 Performance Assessment Log.pdf PDF
AFOTEC Form 1 Customer Checklist.pdf PDF
SAF-AQC-OCI Memo-3 Nov 09.pdf PDF
AFOTEC Form 5 Monthly or Quarterly Assessment Report.pdf PDF
AFOTEC Form 2 Customer Feedback Form.pdf PDF
AFOTEC Form 6 Corrective Action Report.pdf PDF
FA7046-10-R-0001 Final OTES RFP.docx DOCX document
Defense Acquisition Guidebook dated 5 May 10.pdf PDF
Draft RFP Questions Responses Amendment 1.pdf PDF
Draft RFP Questions Responses.pdf PDF
AFI 63-101 Acquisition Sustainment Life Cycle Management.pdf PDF
DoD Directive 5000.1 The Defense Acquisition System.pdf PDF
Defense Acquisition Guidebook —
AFI 33-332 Privacy Act Program.pdf PDF
AFI 33-200 Information Assurance Program.pdf PDF
AFOTECI 99-101 Conduct of Operational Test Evaluation.pdf PDF
DoD Instruction 5000.2 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System.pdf PDF
AFI 16-1001 Verification Validation and Accreditation —
AFI 16-1002 Modeling Simulation —
AFOTEC OT of IA Guide 2nd Edition.pdf PDF
AFI 33-100 User Responsibilities Guidance for Information Systems.pdf PDF
AFOTECPAM 99-104 AFOTEC Operational Suitability Test Evaluation Guide.pdf PDF
DoD 5400.7R DoD Freedom of Information Act —
AFMAN 63-119 Certification of System Readiness for Dedicated Operational Test Evaluation.pdf PDF
AFI 99-103 Capabilities-based Test Evaluation.pdf PDF
CJCS Instruction 3170.01G Joint Capabilities Intergration Development System.pdf PDF
AFI 10-601 Capabilities-based Requirements Development.pdf PDF
AFOTEC OT E Guide 6th Edition.pdf PDF
DoD Instruction 8500.2 Information Assurance Implementation.pdf PDF
FA7046-10-R-0001 DRAFT Request For Proposal.pdf PDF
Responses to Draft PWS Posting OTES Jan 10.pdf PDF
Draft OTES PWS.pdf PDF
Show all 37

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Item RFP Reference, if given in response Question/Comment/Recommendation Government Response

Section H-270 Key Personnel (Mar 2008), (b) states:

“The offeror agrees that during the task order performance period no personnel substitutions will be permitted unless such substitutions are necessitated by an individuals’ sudden illness, death or termination of employment.”

Question 1. Does this apply to all personnel or just “Key Personnel”?

Question 2. This requirement seems excessively restrictive since task orders could be awarded for multiple years and employees could have to forgo advancement within the company because they are “tied” to a specific task order. Would the Government consider limiting this restriction to the first year of the task order? Question 3. Please clarify the approval authority for substitutions.

1) This only applies to Key Personnel identified in the clause. As none were identified, this clause does not apply to either task order.

2) No, if key personnel are identified, they have been identified as being crucial to the task order's success.

3) The approval authority is the Contracting Officer.

Section L7.3.3 Subfactor Three:

Management states:

“…shall provide the following…;

Approach, L7.3.3.1.3 states:

“Personnel used to support this contract and their specific experience and skills relevant to this effort. Provide position description for all direct personnel supporting technical requirements.”

Because of the breath of the technical requirements required to be executed by the RFP PWS, the offeror will be required to include multiple position descriptions in this section. Because of the page limitation in this section (“Management Plan is NTE 10 pages total with the transition plan NTE 5 pages.”) may we summarize the position descriptions in a table in this section and include a more detailed written description in Volume IV, Cost/Price?

Position descriptions are not included in the page limitation.

Section 9.0 Volume IV – Cost/Price contains specific detail for the information required for Task Order pricing and for indirect rates.

Since only a select subset of the positions the offeror is proposing for the contract is included in the sample task orders, how does the Government want the offeror to present the cost for the remaining positions required as part of the Management Plan?

The task orders are not samples, they are REAL task orders requiring Offerors to being performing at time of award. All positions should be priced for each task order.

Section L2.1.4 states in part that tables, graphs and charts are to be “no smaller than Times New Roman 10 Point.”

Will the government consider Arial 10 Point suitable for these presentations? Yes

Section L2.1.1 states that “text lines shall have 1.5 line spacing.”

Given the volume of information that must be presented, would the government consider 1 versus 1.5 line spacing? No, 1.5 spacing is required.

45 Volume IV Cost/Price.

It is understood that Task Order 1 and 2 are to be accomplished on government site and at government site rates. Will all work on this ID/IQ be accomplished on government site and if not, does this necessitate a requirement for off-site rates in the cost proposal?

At this time, all work is to be accomplished on government site.

However, there may be times where work will be accomplished off-site. Requests for task order proposals will identify this and at that time, proposals shall address off-site rates.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .