23R0013 QandA 051623.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA701423R0013
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| RFP Section Reference | Question | |
| Attachment 4, “1. Pricelist” tab, row 8-10 | The included mapping to OMB SOC # 11-9198 does not seem to exist on www.bls.gov. An adjacent SOC# appears to be the government’s intent. Please confirm that the OMB SOC # for the “Manager” series of labor categories (LCATs) is 11-9199? | Spreadsheet is revised to read the OMB SOC major group level to allow Offeror's discretion |
| Attachment 4, “1. Pricelist” tab, row 11-13 | For the “Scientist” series of LCATs, the identified OMB-SOC # is 19-4099. According to www.bls.gov, that SOC description is “Life, Physical, and Social Science Technicians, All Other”, which may not directly appear to be in support of HAF A2/6 scope as the title, description, and salary range do not appear to map directly to HAF A2/6 requirements. Please verify if the OMB SOC # should be 15-1221 “Computer and Information Research Scientists” or possibly some other SOC#? | Spreadsheet is revised to read the OMB SOC major group level to allow Offeror's discretion |
| Attachment 4, “1. Pricelist” tab, row 17-18 | For the “Budget Analyst” series of LCATs, the identified OMB-SOC # is 13-2099, “Financial Specialists, All Other”. Please confirm if this is correct or if the government means for this series to be mapped to the OMB SOC # for the “Budget Analyst”, which BLS shows is “13-2031”? | Spreadsheet is revised to read the OMB SOC major group level to allow Offeror's discretion |
| Attachment 4, “1. Pricelist” tab, I3:19 | There does not appear to be an “Average” formula in cells I3:I19. Will the government allow for offerors to modify attachment 4 to insert this formula? | All formulas in spreadsheet removed. Offerors are to apply formula. |
| Attachment 4, “1. Pricelist” tab, D19:I19 | The “Average” formulas in row 19, D19:I19 seem to create a circular reference and may not properly calculate the average rates for each PoP. Will the government allow for offerors to modify attachment 4 to correct this formula? | All formulas in spreadsheet removed. Offerors are to apply formula. |
| In reference to Atch 5: Page 2-3; Section 2.6, Table 1, | Is the Government requesting a separate document for each component of the Subfactor? Or are we to using the table as a point of references for organization in which the final submission should consist of four (4) documents in total: a Cover Letter, Volume I, Volume II and Attachment 4 – Price Sheet? The usage of subfolder and volume together is the source of the confusion. | Submission package is anticipated to be more than 4 documents. Please ensure the documents reference the breakdown for organization purposes. |
| 2. In reference to Attachment 5: ITO and Evaluation Criteria Section 3.2.3 RFP Attachment 4, | In the event the subcontractors/teaming partners have agreed to adhere to the Prime contractors PECP, do the subcontractors/teaming partners still have to submit individual PECPs to the Government directly for this effort? | Yes, still need Subcontractor's PECP. |
| Drop link for files potenally larger than 5MB. | Drop Links will not be provided. Proposals shall be submitted via email to the points of contacts listed IAW Atch 5, Section 2.1 of the solicitation. Files can be received up to 50MB. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .