Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 202 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SAF/SB Strategic Communication Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA7014-08-R-0047
About this file
Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA7014-08-R-0047-0001.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers for Solicitation FA7014-08-R-0047 As of 2 Sep 08.doc | DOC document | |
| Questions and Answers for Solicitation FA7014-08-R-0047 As of 29 Aug 08.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 7 Requirements Document.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 1 Statement of Objectives.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 4 Past Performance Info Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 2 Total Evaluated Price | — | |
| Attachment 6 Sample Consent Letter.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 3 Ordering Table.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA7014-08-R-0047, Attachment 5
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104
Air Force District Washington
Acquisition Division
MEMORANDUM FOR PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION REFERENCE
24 August 2008 FROM: AFDW Acquisition Division (A7KS)
2822 Doherty Dr SW, Suite 310
Bldg 94, PSC 341
Anacostia Annex, DC 20373
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
1. You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a contract with AFDW Acquisition Division (A7KS), Anacostia Annex, DC.
2. Please provide past performance information regarding subject contractor by completing the attached questionnaire and returning it either via E-mail to Natalie.Sitkowski@afncr.af.mil and Myra.Toles@afncr.af.mil or facsimile to (202) 767-7817 (please call to confirm reciept) by noon Daylight Savings Time (DST) Friday, 12 September 2008.
3. If you have any questions concerning this request, you may contact Natalie Sitkowski at (202) 767-8107.
//signed//
NATALIE A. SITKOWSKI
Contracting Officer
Atch:
Past Performance Questionnaire
REFERENCE # F1AF258106A001, ATTACHMENT 5
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection. Request a representative of the contracting organization and a technical representative, the Program Manager (PM) -and the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), complete this questionnaire and e-mail or send by facsimile (FAX) to:
AFDW Acquisition Division (A7KS)
ATTN: Natalie A. Sitkowski
2822 Doherty Dr SW, Suite 310
Bldg 94, PSC 341
Anacostia Annex, DC 20373
FAX: (202) 767-7817 Natalie.Sitkowski@afncr.af.mil and Myra.Toles@afncr.af.mil When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
BLOCKS 1 THROUGH 7 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR
1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
2. CONTRACT NO.:
3. CONTRACT AWARD DATE:
4. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE/COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (WITH OPTIONS):
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
7. TITLE OF CONTRACT AND DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
BLOCKS 8 THROUGH 10 TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATION ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION (PCO/PM/COR/OTHER) AND ORGANIZATION:
b. EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER: ________________________________________________________________
c. MONTHS CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR: ____________________________
d. RATINGS Please circle the response code which best reflects your evaluation of the contractor’s performance.
| EX = EXCELLENT - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VG = VERY GOOD - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| SA = SATISFACTORY - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| MA = MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| US = UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| N/R = NOT RATED - Contract does not/did not require performance of this element. |
A. Technical Ability
| A-1. Ability to manage multiple contractors |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| A-2. Ability to provide sound project management |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| A-3. Ability to minimize risk and resolve issues |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| A-4. Ability to function as a true integrator of process, function, and systems |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| A-5. Ability to implement and maintain change management |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| A-6. Ability to meet schedules and handle project changes |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
B. Management Plan
| B-1. Effectively manage resources and personnel. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| B-2. Overall, risk management for the program. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| B-3. Best value (balance of performance vs. cost). |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| B-4. Timeliness in meeting task schedules and performance including workload surges. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| B-5. Quality assurance of products and services delivered. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| B-6. Solving problems and resolution processes. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| B-7. Employing of partnering and teaming strategies with government representatives and other contractors. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| B-8. Ability to adapt to changing requirements to meet customer needs. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| B-9. Demonstrated commitment to success of customer mission. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
C. Personnel Plan
| C-1. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| C-2. Peronnel provided in a timely manner. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| C-3. Appropriate mix of labor/management categories. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| C-4. Commitment of personnel to success of customer mission. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
D. Technical Approach
| D-1. Clear and comprehensive technical approach to meeting the customer’s needs. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| D-2. Ability to adapt approach to changing requirements. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| D-3. Demonstrated control of data management processes. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
E. Price, Administration and Certifications
| E-1. Overall cost control (avoidance of overruns/underruns). |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| E-2. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| E-3. Ability to work with program, contracting, and budget offices. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
F. Security
| F-1. Understanding of physical security compliance. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
| F-2. Compliance with communication and information security. |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
G. Contractual Obligations
| G-1. Has an option not been exercised due to the contractor’s poor performance? |
| YES |
| NO |
| G-2. Has a cure notice or show cause notice ever been issued? |
| YES |
| NO |
| G-3. Would you hire this contractor again? |
| YES |
| NO |
| 9. Overall Assessment: |
| EX |
| VG |
| SA |
| MA |
| US |
| N/R |
10. Any unsatisfactory performance noted above has been shared with the contractor: ( ) Yes [ written ( ) or oral ( )? ] ( ) No
Please Comment:
PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO IDENTIFY:
a. Specific Strengths/Weaknesses Related to Part 8 Above - Please Cite the Alphanumeric Code.
b. Two or Three Best Corporate “Traits” or Skills Observed.
c. Any Areas of Improvement that are most “Troublesome.”
d. Any Area with an Asterick (*)
Please add a continuation page for comments (Include Contractor Name, Contractor Number and RFP Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .