The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
FA7000-15-R-0002
Section J, Attachment 12 16 December 2014
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CAStLE Engineering and Research Activities for Aging Structures
When completed, this document is source selection sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for an Indefinite-Delivery-Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) research contract for the Center For Aircraft Structural Life Extension at the United States Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire is greatly appreciated. Please provide the completed questionnaire no later than 19 February 2015 and ensure that it is returned directly and only to the Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer via fax or email:
| Londres Medranda | | | Matthew McLean |
| Contract Specialist | | | Contracting Officer |
| 10th Contracting Squadron | | 10th Contracting Squadron | |
| Fax: (719) 333-8939 | | | Fax: (719) 333-8939 |
| Email: londres.medranda@us.af.mil | Email: matthew.mclean.10@us.af.mil | | |
If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Londres Medranda, Contract Specialist at (719) 333-8939 or the undersigned at (719) 333-3907.
Best regards,
| MATTHEW A. McLEAN |
| Procurement Contracting Officer |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor: _ ______________ B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:
C. Contract number: ___ D. Contract type:
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No F. Period of performance:
G. Initial contract price/cost:$ H. Current/final contract price/cost:$ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract price/cost and final contract price/costs:
| J. Was a CPAR or other official evaluation completed? Yes | No | | |
| K. Contractor performed as: | Prime Contractor | Subcontractor | Key Personnel |
Note: If Offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization completed within the last 5 years or ongoing, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
L. Description of product, service or research provided to include which similar/same tasks (1-9) from the four likely awardable task orders was performed on this contract. (use additional sheets, if necessary):
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
| A. Customer or agency name: | | | | | | ___ | | |
| B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): | ___ | Air Force | Other DoD Component | _ | _Other Federal Gov’t | | Industry/Academia | |
| C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands: | | | | | | | | ____________ |
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR/RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
| A. Evaluator/Respondent’s name: | | | ____ | | |
| B. Title: | | | | | _______________ |
| C. Phone/fax number: | | _____________________ | | | |
| D. Email address: | | | | _______________ | |
| E. Number of years evaluator/respondent worked on subject contract: | _ | | | | |
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. The scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
E EXCEPTIONAL/BLUE – During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.
| VG | VERY GOOD/PURPLE – During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action. |
| S | SATISFACTORY/GREEN - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action. |
| M | MARGINAL/YELLOW – During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required. |
| U | UNSATISFACTORY/RED - During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required. |
N/A NOT APPLICABLE/WHITE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
You are asked to discuss each response for which you indicated E (Exceptional/Blue), M (Marginal/Yellow) or U (Unsatisfactory/Red) in response to the questions below (use comments column and additional sheets, if necessary).
a. Technical (Quality of Product)
| (1) Product Performance "If applicable, how well did the contractor..." |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| COMMENTS |
| TECH - 01 |
| ...develop curriculum for a technical course (related to science and engineering), including course content and delivery method(s)? (indicate the size of the course's audience) |
| TECH - 02 |
| ...present technical training and/or courses (related to science and engineering) either in-person or on-line? (indicate the size of the course's audience) |
| TECH - 03 |
| ...perform a literature review or survey of existing data in anticipation of performing a related technical task? |
| (2) Systems Engineering "If applicable, how well did the contractor..." |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| COMMENTS |
| TECH - 04 |
| ...develop an extraction plan for a teardown analysis of a transport category aircraft or similarly large structure consistent with program goals? |
| TECH - 05 |
| ...use a part tracking system during a teardown analysis program to ensure all parts were tracked by part number, location and by process step, recording the information for reference, retrieval and archival purposes? |
| (3) Logistic Support/Sustainment "If applicable, how well did the contractor..." |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| COMMENTS |
| TECH - 06 |
| ...perform NDI on aging structures using certified NDI technicians and NDI technique(s) appropriate to the inspection? |
| TECH - 07 |
| ...deploy, or support deployment of, a new structural inspection, including supporting technical data? |
| TECH - 08 |
| ...perform probabilistic risk analysis of dynamically loaded flight or ground vehicle structures as a function of multiple input parameters? |
| TECH - 09 |
| ...prevent, detect, predict and/or manage corrosion of flight vehicles, ground vehicles and/or infrastructure in common ground or aerospace environments? (indicate what type of structure was managed) |
| TECH - 10 |
| ...perform full-scale structural testing in support of aircraft or other aging structure sustainment, publishing the results in a written report? |
| TECH - 11 |
| ...develop inspection intervals for a safety-related structural element based on a crack growth analysis and inspection capabilities? |
| TECH - 12 |
| ...author significant ASIP documentation, such as an ASIP Master Plan, a Corrosion Prevention and Control Plan, or other ASIP elements described in Table II of MIL-STD-1530C? |
| TECH - 13 |
| ...develop or provide engineering support to a Loads/Environment Spectral Survey (L/ESS), Individual Aircraft Tracking (IAT), or other structural health monitoring program? |
| TECH - 14 |
| ...instrument an operational aircraft or other vehicle for the purposes of collecting load, strain, acceleration and/or environmental data, publishing the results in a written report? |
| (4) Other Technical Performance "If applicable, how well did the contractor..." |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| COMMENTS |
| TECH - 15 |
| ...formally perform teardown analysis procedures (extraction, disassembly, coatings removal, NDI, failure analysis) in accordance with a written plan to achieve teardown program objectives? |
| TECH - 16 |
| ...develop the necessary instruments, guides and standards to use during performance of NDI? |
| TECH - 17 |
| ...determine the susceptibility of a material to corrosion in common ground/aerospace environments or experimentally determine the effectiveness of corrosion preventative compounds? |
| TECH - 18 |
| ...determine the root cause of failure in an aircraft or other vehicle structural component using failure analysis techniques, publishing the results in a written report? |
| TECH - 19 |
| ...perform coupon-level or sub-structure testing for durability, fatigue crack growth, or residual strength in support of aircraft or other aging structure sustainment, publishing the results in a written report? |
| TECH - 20 |
| ...perform a damage tolerance analysis for an aluminum or steel alloy and publish the results in a written report? |
| TECH - 21 |
| ...perform a finite element analysis of a structure or structural component, publishing the results in a written report? |
| b. Schedule "If applicable, how well did the contractor..." |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| COMMENTS |
| SCHED - 01 |
| ...develop, implement and monitor realistic progress schedules? |
| SCHED - 02 |
| ...timely deliver schedules and other deliverables/reports with only minor, if any, corrections required (no major revisions required)? |
| c. Management "If applicable, how well did the contractor..." |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| COMMENTS |
| MGMT - 01 |
| ...transport and store transport type aircraft lots, teardown sections, and teardown parts for a substantial portion of one or more transport type aircraft? (indicate how many aircraft were involved) |
| (1) Management Responsiveness "If applicable, how well did the contractor..." |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| COMMENTS |
| MGMT - 02 |
| ...display initiative to solve problems? |
| MGMT - 03 |
| ...demonstrate the ability to recruit, hire, train, retain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period? |
| MGMT - 04 |
| ...provide experienced managers and supervisors with the management skills needed to meet contract requirements? |
| MGMT - 05 |
| ...demonstrate the ability to execute a surge (ramp up) of this order-of magnitude (reference – adjusting company organizational structure and resources (labor quantity, type, experience level)) necessary to execute to a contract of similar magnitude? |
| MGMT - 06 |
| ...correct deficiencies in deliverables in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures? |
| MGMT - 07 |
| ...respond efficiently to contract changes? |
| MGMT - 08 |
| ...cooperate with government or company personnel after award? |
| MGMT - 09 |
| ...submit proposals within required response time? |
| (2) Subcontract Management "If applicable, how well did the contractor..." |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| COMMENTS |
| MGMT - 10 |
| ...demonstrate an ability to manage subcontractors and teaming partners? |
| MGMT - 11 |
| ...demonstrate an ability to surge (increase) subcontractor/teaming arrangement resources necessary to execute to a contract of similar magnitude to this acquisition? |
| (3) Program & Other Management "If applicable, how well did the contractor..." |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| COMMENTS |
| MGMT - 12 |
| ...achieve external agency NDI vendor qualification in support of a teardown analysis program, or another program requiring external qualification? |
| d. Other Areas |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| COMMENTS |
| OTHER - 01 |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| OTHER - 02 |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “comments.” Use additional pages if necessary. |
Please circle one of the following: Yes / No
| OTHER - 03 |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “comments.” Use additional pages if necessary. |
Please circle one of the following: Yes / No
Additional space for comments rated as E (Exceptional/Blue), M (Marginal/Yellow) or U (Unsatisfactory/Red) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default of convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations No
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract? (use additional sheets, if necessary)
What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract? (use additional sheets, if necessary)
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired. (use additional sheets, if necessary)
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
londres.medranda@us.af.mil matthew.mclean.10@us.af.mil