Attachment__4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 38 KB Posted

Attached to
Administrative Support Services IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA7000-14-R-0022
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Headquarters Air Force Academy

About this file

Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

IAW FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FAX OR E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

FAX TO THE ATTENTION OF: Michael Davidson, Contract Specialist or Diana Thrasher, Contracting Officer, 719-333-9075

E-MAIL: diana.thrasher@us.af.mil or michael.davidson.11@us.af.mil

A. EVALUATED CONTRACTOR’S INFORMATION:

Company/Organization Name

Cage Code:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Email

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Respondent’s Name:

Respondent’s Title

Company/Organization Name

Address:

Telephone Number:

Evaluated Contractor Performed as:
Prime Contractor _______or Sub Contractor ________

C. FULL TIME EQUIVALENTS (FTEs) PROVIDED:

Please provide the specialty title and number of FTEs provided by the evalulated contractor.

D. CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract Title/Description:

Contract Number:

Task Order Number if Applicable

Status (i.e. On-going, complete):

Contract Amount: total amount of base plus any options

Type of Contract

Place of Performance:

Total Number of FTEs

E. RATING INFORMATION:

Choose the Rating that most accurately describes the Offeror’s performance or situation.

RATING
DEFINITION
Exceptional (E)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the government’s benefit.
Very Good (VG)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government’s benefit.
Satisfactory (S)
Performance meets contractual requirements.
Marginal (M)
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective action.
Unsatisfactory (U)
Performance does not meet contractual requirements recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor’s corrective actions to date are ineffective.
Not Applicable = (N/A)
Unable to provide a score.

F. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONS:

Quality of Services

Performance Rating

(1) The Contractor provided quality services that adhered to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of professional conduct.

(2) The Contractor provided quality contract employees that met or exceeded the required qualifications.

(3) The Contractor demonstrated an overall effective and quality management effort.

(4) The Contractor’s ability to assimilate and accommodate changes in contractual requirements and/or priority.

Schedule

Performance Rating

(1) The labor turnover in key personnel and other labor categories (to include contract employees) was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor Performance.

(3) The Contractor demonstrated the ability to retain incumbent contract employees to support contract/task order requirements so that work schedules would not be disrupted.

(4) The Contractor demonstrated the ability to plan for and provide replacement candidates during the life of the contract to include pre-planned absences, unplanned illnesses, or an extended leave of absence.

(5) The contractor was responsive/timely to administrative functions of the contract.

(6) The contractor met all training requirements in a timely manner.

Business Relations

Performance Rating

(1) The Contractor had the ability to respond effectively to contract performance issues.

(2) Contractor’s overall cooperation relative to this contract.

(3) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective solutions to critical contract issues.

(4) The Contractor provided proactive and effective management of its subcontractors.

(5) The Contractor was able to resolve customer complaints quickly and effectively.

G. OTHER:

(1) Would you award this firm another contract? ( ) Yes, ( ) No. If you answered “No” provide an explanation. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(2) Was a cure notice_____; show cause notice_____; and/or______ terminated for default issued to this firm during performance of this contract? If you answered “Yes”, provide an explanation. ______________________________________________________________________________

(3) Based upon the information you provided and using the definitions provided in the evaluation criteria above, the overall performance rating you would give this Contractor is:

Exceptional ____ Very Good ______ Satisfactory ______ Marginal ______ Unsatisfactory ______ Unknown ______

COMMENTS: (ALL Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Exceptional or Very Good ratings require comments to support the same. Failure to provide comments will render questionnaire void and will not be evaluated by the Government):

Thank you for you for completing this questionnaire!

Attachment 4

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .