Attch_05_-__Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 84 KB Posted

Attached to
Portable Chemical Toilet Services and Rentals
Solicitation number
FA7000-13-R-0007
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 05. Revised Past Performance Questionnaire. PPQs are due 24 April 2013 12 00 PM MST.

View the file

Other files

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Solicitation FA7000-10-R-0036

Attachment 5

Attachment 5

FA7000-13-R-0007

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Sample Cover Letter

(The format to be used shall be substantially as follows:)

Company:

Date

Address:

1. We are contemplating offering a proposal for a solicitation from the 10th Contracting Squadron located at United States Air Force Academy, CO. The solicitation is for Chemical Portable Toilets Services and Rentals. This proposal requires that we provide past performance information. Please complete the attached past performance questionnaire and return it via mail, fax or email to:

Mail:

10 CONS/LGCA

Attn: FA7000-13-R-0007/Aaron Vollbracht 5226 Cedar Drive USAF Academy, CO 80840-2315 Fax: 719-333-9705

E-mail: aaron.vollbracht@us.af.mil

2. In order to ensure this questionnaire is considered, please forward this survey to arrive at the above address, no later than 24 April 2013 at 12:00 PM, MST. Upon completion, please notify my office that the survey has been accomplished.

Name & Title of Individual

Name of Company

1 Attachment:

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Contractor’s Name: __________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________* Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________* Dollar Amount: ________* Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: _______________________ * Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent:

_____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________

Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________

Fax Number:

Email Address: _____________________

C. RETURN COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE VIA MAIL, FAX OR EMAIL TO:

Mail:

10 CONS/LGCA

Attn: FA7000-13-R-0007/Aaron Vollbracht 5226 Cedar Drive USAF Academy, CO 80840-2315 Fax: 719-333-9075

E-mail: aaron.vollbracht@us.af.mil D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF Exceptional, Marginal or Unsatisfactory. A block for the narrative is provided at the end of each Section for Quality of Work, Technical Performance, Schedule and Business Relations.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix on the previous page.

E
G
S
M
U
N
1
Quality of Work
1.1
The contractor complied with quality standards under contractual terms and conditions.
1.2
The contractor complied with industry standards, regulations, and local procedures.
1.3
The contractor provided timely and complete documentation
1.4
The contractor complied with all required federal, state, city, and local environmental policies and plans.
1.5
The contractor responded appropriately to any task rejections and took actions to correct the deficiency.
1.6
The contractor rectified any noted deficiencies in the work in a timely and efficient manner.
1.7
Please provide your observations regarding Quality.
2
Technical Performance
2.1
The contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.2
The contractor demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
2.3
If the project required contractor employee background checks prior to working in a government secure area or similar commercial environment, the contractor employees had no problems obtaining the necessary credentials.
2.4
The contractor complied with labor standards and documentation.
2.5
The contractor has an effective Quality Control Plan and follows procedures
2.6
The contractor provided and effectively managed quality subcontractors and ensured those subcontractors complied with all contract requirements.
2.7
Please provide your observations regarding Technical Performance.
3
Schedule
3.1
The contractor provided services in a timely manner in accordance with contract terms and conditions.
3.2
The contractor was able to support large events (athletic events, large ceremonies, etc.) in a timely manner.
3.3
The contractor responded to emergency and unscheduled requirements in a timely manner.
3.4
Please provide your observations regarding Schedule.
4
Business Relations
4.1
The contractor was responsive to contract changes.
4.2
How would you rate the relationship between the contractor and client’s/customer’s team?
4.3
The contractor was willing and cooperative on issues needing resolution.
4.4
How well did the contractor meet small business subcontracting goals and/or facilitate small business involvement in the project?
4.5
Please provide your observations regarding Business Relations.
5
Summary
5.1
Would you award another contract to the company being evaluated? If no, please explain.

YES/NO

5.2
Was the customer satisfied with the finished product? If no, please explain.

YES/NO

5.3
Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain:

YES/NO

5.4
Additional Remarks:
5.5
Overall rating for this firm:
E
G
S
M
U

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .